Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Sanchez
- Thread starter blitz90
- Start date
Vance87
All Pro
Texaninlild
Veteran
Are we talking Butt Fumble Dirty Sanchez? I think not-
I'm losing what little respect I had for these bozos with every danged tweet.
From now on, I ain't believin' nuthin unless I hear it from this guy...
Now he keeps it REAL!!
Hervoyel
BUENO!
paycheck71
Hall of Fame
No, thank you.
htownfan32
Hall of Fame
Am I the only one who found the first gif much funnier than the buttfumble one?
drs23
Veteran
No. You're not.
Marshall
Not pretty, but ALIVE!
Been saying that a while. But not at the current pay scale.
markn
All Pro
Definitely not
Schaub hasn't been to two AFC championship games and has injury questions.
I'm not all that keen on Sanchez being a Texan ..... but I do think its at an improvement over a physically broken Schaub.
Sanchez could end up being a decent signing , he's proven before that he can be an offensive "caretaker" who limited turnovers & mistakes while letting the defense & running game do the heavy lifting .... all the way to two consecutive AFC Championship games.
Buttfumble and all , he's likely better than any option available via FA , man this is a crappy FA class .....
Cant believe I just typed this post ....
bah007
Hall of Fame
Schaub hasn't been to two AFC championship games and has injury questions.
I'm not all that keen on Sanchez being a Texan ..... but I do think its at an improvement over a physically broken Schaub.
Sanchez could end up being a decent signing , he's proven before that he can be an offensive "caretaker" who limited turnovers & mistakes while letting the defense & running game do the heavy lifting .... all the way to two consecutive AFC Championship games.
Buttfumble and all , he's likely better than any option available via FA , man this is a crappy FA class .....
Cant believe I just typed this post ....
Has it really come to this?
I don't see Schaub playing another game at Reliant as a Texan.
Sign Sanchez to a front loaded two year deal. Draft a QB in the first three rounds. Kick Sanchez to the curb after this season or let him walk after next season. Insert drafted QB as starter.
The1ApplePie
Hall of Fame
Sanchez would be a good placeholder until the rookie is ready, and could be a solid future backup, regardless of meme status.
Does have the talent to win some games if he has to.
Better than Keenum, Freeman, or whatever trash is left on the free agent market.
Does have the talent to win some games if he has to.
Better than Keenum, Freeman, or whatever trash is left on the free agent market.
Nope.
Has it really come to this?
I don't see Schaub playing another game at Reliant as a Texan.
Sign Sanchez to a front loaded two year deal. Draft a QB in the first three rounds. Kick Sanchez to the curb after this season or let him walk after next season. Insert drafted QB as starter.
Yeah...
I'm afraid that's how deep the Schaub hate runs in some corners of the fanbase.
I'd rather see a rookie thrown to the wolves - trial by fire - than ever see Mark "GQ" Sanchez in a Texans uni. This reeks of desperation if true.
Malloy
Hall of Fame
My exact thoughts. I'll rather crash and burn with a rook at the helm than have Sanchez come to the Texans...
Grams
Veteran
Me too.
I don't either.
I think some of these "pundits" are connecting every QB, living or dead, not currently under contract as someone "the Texans are considering." If they throw every possible name out there ONE of them has to be right.
Those rookie QBs don't look so bad now, do they?
Nothing's funnier than the buttfumble.
If it makes you feel any better, you're still wrong.
Can he play QB, too?No.
But I'd still rather go with Robinson
infantrycak
Hall of Fame
Texian
Hall of Fame
McNair is seeing visions of how many Sanchez jerseys he can sell.
PapaL
Loose Screw
I think that's a "hell in a handbasket" scenario.
House of Pain
Wild Speculator
Uhh...none?
Sanchez would only be a confidence builder for a rookie. The guy is a hot steaming pile of garbage.
"Hey [insert rookie's name], dude you just beat out MAARK SANCHEZ! He's been to two AFC Championship games man! Yeah, he was the butt fumble guy and no, no other team wanted him to start for them but he went to USC! A school with a long line of NFL QBs like Matt Lineart, Mark Sanchez, Carson Palmer... So yeah, it doesn't mean much but at least you didn't LOSE out to him."
OK. So its not a confidence builder. It just lets the rookie know that he's preferable to a hot steaming pile of garbage.
Keep him far, far away. Don't sign anybody. If you're going to do that then roll with Yates, let him hold the clip board. Like it or not, he has some starting experience and he's an outstanding backup QB. He can offer pointers too. No need to spend $$ on Sanchez because if you're doing that you're announcing that you're working on the future anyway.
Mike
"Hey [insert rookie's name], dude you just beat out MAARK SANCHEZ! He's been to two AFC Championship games man! Yeah, he was the butt fumble guy and no, no other team wanted him to start for them but he went to USC! A school with a long line of NFL QBs like Matt Lineart, Mark Sanchez, Carson Palmer... So yeah, it doesn't mean much but at least you didn't LOSE out to him."
OK. So its not a confidence builder. It just lets the rookie know that he's preferable to a hot steaming pile of garbage.
Keep him far, far away. Don't sign anybody. If you're going to do that then roll with Yates, let him hold the clip board. Like it or not, he has some starting experience and he's an outstanding backup QB. He can offer pointers too. No need to spend $$ on Sanchez because if you're doing that you're announcing that you're working on the future anyway.
Mike
No.
But I'd still rather go with Robinson
Well be ready for that rumor. It's just about time. We've been linked to everyone else. Just like it was just a matter of time before we were linked to Sanchez. I'm with you that id rather have Robinson.
Remember the last time we threw a rookie QB to the wolves , it ruined him. He had happy feet and sacked himself for the rest of his career ....
Sure , Sanchez sucks .... but I'd rather send him out to get pummeled than a rookie.
We really have to realize that this coming season looks appears to be .... nothing but a building , cap clearing year where our coach and QB of the future gets a bit of on the job training.
Well... with Robinson, Brown, & Brooks on our line, that can give us the kind of rushing attack that propelled Sanchez to the AFC Championship game...
twice.
If we're just sending tackling dummies out there, we don't need to sign a new QB, we've got that right here already...... cheap too in Yates & Keenum. They'll give us just as much of a chance to win as the buttfumbler.
The1ApplePie
Hall of Fame
Sanchez is a perfect bridge player. No one expects him to be a franchise QB (no delusional Keenum/VY/Tebow fans chanting from the stands), talented and experienced enough to win a few games, and young enough to be a long-term backup.
The best option right now, unless you think that Christian Ponder or Josh Freeman can fill that role
If it were as simple as a tackling dummy , sure I'd agree. But it isn't , McNair wants results that Keenum & Yates simply aren't capable of providing.
Both Keenum & Yates have shown a propensity for mistakes.
Sanchez has shown the ability .... Not to lose games when provided with a solid defense & running game. (That's not saying he's going to win you games , just not lose them).
With Sanchez you probably win more games than with either Yates or Keenum.
This should not be the 2002 Texans expansion o-line, revisited. There are 2 Pro Bowl players set to start. Surely, O'Brien can come up with 3 additional starters from the current roster, the draft, and possibly 2nd tier free agents. I don't think the Texans QB should be in line for a pummeling next season.
In regards to Sanchez, I think there's a good chance he ends up in Chicago. The Bears don't have a backup QB, and Sanchez's former QB coach, Matt Cavenough, is in the Chi-Town. Cutler has had some type of injury 3 years running, and that has to make the job even more enticing for Sanchez.
I would rather just go with Keenum /Yates/and a draft pick like Garapollo/Smith/Savage/Murray. This is only if a trade for Mallett doesn't happen.
Starting Keenum/Yates for the 1st 4-8 games and then bringing in the rookie should,
1. Ensure the record is bad enough that the 2015 draft pick is high enough that the cost of moving up in the draft isn't prohibitive.
2. You get a free look at your rookie QB so you should be able to determine if this yrs draft QB is the QB of the future and if he is he gains invaluable experience.
3. If your rookie QB is the guy, because you let Keenum/Yates start the record should still be bad enough to get high 2015 draft picks and add to what should be a stellar Texans 2014 draft class. Not that I've got any faith in the Texans ability to produce a stellar 2014 draft class.
I can see why McNair wants Sanchez though, he gives them the ability to win 6-8 games next yr (Gary like) that way McNair can sell to his fanbase that,
1. The team is improving
2. You only have to pay top 10-15 $$$$ rather than 1-1 $$$$.
You know kinda like McNair was when Gary would always go on those late season runs to finish in the 7-9/9-7 territory and mediocrity continues to live in H-Town.
BullNation4Life
All Pro
Mark.....Sanch....
Sorry, just threw up in my mouth a little bit....
Sorry, just threw up in my mouth a little bit....