Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!

NFLN Irvin Predicts that Texans Are Screwed

CloakNNNdagger

CloakNNNdagger

Hall of Fame
In fact, the Pats will score 6 TDs..........and win by more than 50 points........

images
 
Serial Houston hater, this clown is. Irvin has a loooooong history of bagging on all things Houston. (strippers notwithstanding)
 
NFL Network is unwatchable -- too many clowns.

I'd rather watch Peyton Manning Buick commercials.
 
I can't understand why you guys even care what these mediots say. Their opinion is no better than ours, except they get to say it on TV. Who cares!

I guess you can find threads like this on all team's message boards. I know that happen on Patsfans.com. I don't understand them there either. Besides, Irvin is a clown, a bad characterture of himself, and a big fan of BB to boot. :D
 
Playoffs said:
NFL Network is unwatchable -- too many clowns.

I'd rather watch Peyton Manning Buick commercials.
Click to expand...

Its sad cause before they brought all the clowns onto the broadcast it was my fav NFL show to watch. Not anymore.

They have clowns who have no ideal what they are talking about and just always pick the glamour pick
 
Playoffs said:
NFL Network is unwatchable -- too many clowns.
Click to expand...

Strongly disagree. I think the NFLN is way better than anything else out there on the cablewaves.

Yeah, Irvin is Irvin, but cmon. Rich Eisen is simply the best there is. I like Mariucci, Kurt Warner, Heath Evans, Darren Sharper, Siciliano, Eric Davis, etc. They do a very good job covering the NFL imo without being too overtly "CW" on the safe end or trollish on the opposite extreme. I think they generally bring pretty good analysis to the on-air jibber jabber. Far better than ESPN's biggest names, imo.

Also, they have eyepopping "talent" on their telecasts, too. Nicole Zaloumis....can't stop staring at her.
 
CloakNNNdagger said:
In fact, the Pats will score 6 TDs..........and win by more than 50 points........

images
Click to expand...

Last week he couldn't stop going on about how important momentum is and that Bengal win in a not so close game. He then hedged his bets on the pick'em segment calling it for the Texans. :rolleyes:

I've known people that smoke crack and it doesn't make them as insipidly stupid as Irvin. In other words, Irvin is giving crack a bad name, not the other way round.
 
Dude never predicts the texans for anything except for when its obvious....he hates the texans on the low....figures him being a dallas cow chip and all.
 
patfanken said:
I can't understand why you guys even care what these mediots say. Their opinion is no better than ours, except they get to say it on TV. Who cares!

I guess you can find threads like this on all team's message boards. I know that happen on Patsfans.com. I don't understand them there either. Besides, Irvin is a clown, a bad characterture of himself, and a big fan of BB to boot. :D
Click to expand...

We're just trying to find something to talk about.

Keeping it loose, fun.. you know.

Tomorrow, all hell's going to break loose when we demolish the Patriots at home in the play-offs.
 
Mailman said:
Strongly disagree. I think the NFLN is way better than anything else out there on the cablewaves.

Yeah, Irvin is Irvin, but cmon. Rich Eisen is simply the best there is. I like Mariucci, Kurt Warner, Heath Evans, Darren Sharper, Siciliano, Eric Davis, etc. They do a very good job covering the NFL imo without being too overtly "CW" on the safe end or trollish on the opposite extreme. I think they generally bring pretty good analysis to the on-air jibber jabber. Far better than ESPN's biggest names, imo.

Also, they have eyepopping "talent" on their telecasts, too. Nicole Zaloumis....can't stop staring at her.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I practically have it on 24/7
 
it was during the bold predictions segment..what have we done to convince him otherwise.. until the texans beat these teams in games that matter we will always be on the back end of these types of predictions..
 
417Texan said:
I respect the football player but the Tv analyst is a joke.
Click to expand...

I had a problem with him as a player. I thought he pushed off a lot to get separation. It's not an argument I'm going to win with a lot of people, but I thought he was dirty.

It helps that Aikman was his QB too.
 
hradhak said:
I had a problem with him as a player. I thought he pushed off a lot to get separation. It's not an argument I'm going to win with a lot of people, but I thought he was dirty.

It helps that Aikman was his QB too.
Click to expand...


Agree with 100%. I also felt back in day him and Rice got away with a lot of sh+t.
 
Are we as screwed as he was in the last game of his career in Philly when two DBs converged on him? If so then we might as well NOT show up.


Yeah...I went there. F HIM!
 
These days I always think of North Dallas Forty when the Cowboys are mentioned.
I know that atmosphere wasn't exclusive to the Cowboys, but the movie was, sort of.
.
Sandwich.jpg
 
Mailman said:
Strongly disagree. I think the NFLN is way better than anything else out there on the cablewaves.

Yeah, Irvin is Irvin, but cmon. Rich Eisen is simply the best there is. I like Mariucci, Kurt Warner, Heath Evans, Darren Sharper, Siciliano, Eric Davis, etc. They do a very good job covering the NFL imo without being too overtly "CW" on the safe end or trollish on the opposite extreme. I think they generally bring pretty good analysis to the on-air jibber jabber. Far better than ESPN's biggest names, imo.

Also, they have eyepopping "talent" on their telecasts, too. Nicole Zaloumis....can't stop staring at her.
Click to expand...

Nicole has nice looking legs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top