Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!

Does Matty Need to Watch From The Sidelines Sunday?

Does Matt need to sit, even for just the 1st half, of the Colts game?


  • Total voters
    86
  • Poll closed .

GP

Go Texans!
Does Kubiak need to let Matt stand and watch? I think he does.

I think it needs to be for his own good. Not as punishment. Not to shame him. But as an effort to make him watch instead of being caught up in the same cycle of lack of forward progress that he's been caught up in since the two OT games. I think those games zapped his mental reserve, if you will.

Let the guy watch, make him witness another QB and see the game as it happens instead of being in the heat of the battle every snap. Then plug him into the game after the half. Get that whole team settled down, because I think the team is taking a bit of a hit to their psyche because of Schaub right now.
 
Plus, he'll be "coaching up" Yates, which MIGHT make Schuab more receptive to his own teachings.

Sometimes being placed into the role of "teacher" makes you re-think things yourself. It can remind you of your own failures to do what you're teaching others to do or not to do. You know what I am saying? If I am teaching people how to do something, in terms of how to use technology, and it dawns on me--during that part of the lesson--that I'm not doing, in my own life, what I am teaching others to do for themselves...it tends to creep in and become a bit of a changing moment for me. I have to reconcile that I am not doing as I say.

Just a thought.

It sure seems like Matt has been way WAY lost since the two OT games.
 
No.

He's the best QB on the team.

But not even for a half? And not as a way to create a QB controversy.

Really it's just 30 minutes of time to reflect and to see things from a different angle. I think the guy is sort of dealing with vertigo right now, he doesn't know what is up and what is down.

And I think it's messing with the heads of every single player on this team not named JJ Watt and Andre Johnson.
 
Not just NO BUT HELL NO !!!!

We are playing for a BYE and HFA throught ...Time is not the time to change QB's and go with Yates ...Yates are u kidding me and i think hes good but come on man

ILL SAY AGAIN WE ARE PLAYING FOR BYE !!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is a big game from here on out we gotta live or die with Schaub get over it haters

4 good or bad all our questions and answers will come to light come playoffs
 
This is a crucial game for us to get a first round bye and home field or nothing. You don't sit your starting QB in a game like that. You don't sit your starting QB in the last game before you head into the playoffs with so much at stake.

What sort of xmas weed are you smoking that this even was a kernel of an idea?
 
No. That would disrupt the offense even more to say nothing of the big slimy can of worms/media fodder it would open up heading into the playoffs.

The way I see it is if it's broke, don't make it even broker. :gamer: :D
 
This is a crucial game for us to get a first round bye and home field or nothing. You don't sit your starting QB in a game like that. You don't sit your starting QB in the last game before you head into the playoffs with so much at stake.

What sort of xmas weed are you smoking that this even was a kernel of an idea?

Ya know, you make those same derisive comments in game day threads and then disappear when we end up being proven right.

Selective posting is a nasty habit, Jen.

Just think about it, and try to not be insulting for once in your life. OK? OK.

I haven't seen anything of Schaub since the last OT game he played that tells me Schaub is capable of gutting this out by just hanging in there. In fact, his pattern has been that he's going to try and force MORE things which means a complete meltdown of Matt Schaub Schitty Throw (patented and copyrighted, btw) of epic proportions.

There is no pressure on a guy like Yates if he knows he's only managing the game for ONE HALF versus the Colts. Big damn deal. It gives Matt a breather and conveys to him that he needs to slow it down and think a little.

That's why I voted the way I did. I'd like someone to offer more than just 'He's our best QB" argument. So far, I see nothing BUT that. And truthfully, he's running neck and neck with Yates right now in my book.
 
No.

He's the best QB on the team.

All I know is he played like a scared little school girl in that last game. If at the first sign of pressure he fetals up against Indy his ass needs to be pulled. Kubiak needs to get in his ear and ask him how bad he wants to win. You can say what you want about the blocking up front in the Minnesota game, Schaub packed it in. He played like a :kitten:.
 
No. That would disrupt the offense even more to say nothing of the big slimy can of worms/media fodder it would open up heading into the playoffs.

The way I see it is if it's broke, don't make it even broker. :gamer: :D

Well, we could always have the team's officials lie and say he had a slight problem with his heartbeat like we did with Foster.

I mean, seriously, I don't buy that load of crap from the Texans for one second. He was benched for his fumble. Period. The cover story is to save face in the media.

So, you might be right. They would have to find a convenient excuse as to why they sat Schaub, otherwise it would be bad P.R. and we know the Texans cannot endure THAT! LOL. No sir, that would be outlandish to do so.

Gotta' keep a good face before the media, that's always been the McNair way...even if it means choking on our own vomit along the way.
 
But not even for a half? And not as a way to create a QB controversy.

Really it's just 30 minutes of time to reflect and to see things from a different angle. I think the guy is sort of dealing with vertigo right now, he doesn't know what is up and what is down.

And I think it's messing with the heads of every single player on this team not named JJ Watt and Andre Johnson.


No and it would create a controversy in someone's mind. It wold be an unnecessary distraction when this is the last thing a team needs on the last week of the season and right before the playoffs
 
so your saying if we get a big enough lead by the 2nd half u want us to sit our starters is that what your saying ...????
 
No and it would create a controversy in someone's mind. It wold be an unnecessary distraction when this is the last thing a team needs on the last week of the season and right before the playoffs

Well then, if the NFL world is THAT small of a place...I need to find a new sport to follow.

I just don't see how a very plainly stated position wouldn't be respected.

I guess image is everything. Which explains why this team can't get over the top.

Can I ask one thing: Tell me what series of possessions since the OT games you've seen of Schaub that tells you he's got this under control and can continue 'as is'? Not being snarky. I genuinely want to know reasons or examples.
 
On Sunday, TJ was in for two plays... and he fumbled on both of them. He has a QB rating of 11. ELEVEN!

I'm not even going to dignify this absurd poll with a vote.
 
Last edited:
Well then, if the NFL world is THAT small of a place...I need to find a new sport to follow.

I just don't see how a very plainly stated position wouldn't be respected.

I guess image is everything. Which explains why this team can't get over the top.

Can I ask one thing: Tell me what series of possessions since the OT games you've seen of Schaub that tells you he's got this under control and can continue 'as is'? Not being snarky. I genuinely want to know reasons or examples.
Team is struggling right now. You ride with the horses the got you there at this point.

Tj isn't the answer. What has he shown? This team has average high 20s in points through out the season. Yeah we scored 6 points last week ,which surprised the **** out of me. Anyway nothing against TJ but I honestly haven't seen anything but admiral job last year to holding the fort down.


Reminds me of the joke.

What is the most popular player on the team?

The back up QB
 
Ya know, you make those same derisive comments in game day threads and then disappear when we end up being proven right.

Selective posting is a nasty habit, Jen.

Just think about it, and try to not be insulting for once in your life. OK? OK.

I haven't seen anything of Schaub since the last OT game he played that tells me Schaub is capable of gutting this out by just hanging in there. In fact, his pattern has been that he's going to try and force MORE things which means a complete meltdown of Matt Schaub Schitty Throw (patented and copyrighted, btw) of epic proportions.

There is no pressure on a guy like Yates if he knows he's only managing the game for ONE HALF versus the Colts. Big damn deal. It gives Matt a breather and conveys to him that he needs to slow it down and think a little.

That's why I voted the way I did. I'd like someone to offer more than just 'He's our best QB" argument. So far, I see nothing BUT that. And truthfully, he's running neck and neck with Yates right now in my book.

It's selective posting because I can't read everything on this board, but your posts are usually the most depressing chicken-little threads ever created. But if I point that out, I'm calling you a bad fan, right? Regarding any of that: put on your big girl panties and learn to cope. I don't think you're a ****ty fan, you're just a whiny one who runs around with your hair on fire when the team plays bad. That is a sucky attitude. People can be down about the team and point out flaws, but some people take it way overboard, and come off like doomsday loons regarding this team. That's the bucket I put you in. Sorry dude.

afc.gif


Threads like this is why 99.9999% of fans are unqualified to do anything but WATCH football.

Is Schaub perfect? No. Is he elite? No. Is NOW, right NOW, the correct time to try and make a switch to a different QB? Hells no. Crack rock smokin'.

We are 13-3. If you took your idea of benching Schaub to any professional NFL player, coach or commentator, you would be laughed at, and rightfully so. Your idea seems punitive, nothing more. It will teach him nothing, we will learning nothing new about Yates, and the team would scratch its head and wonder what the hell is going on.

There is NOTHING positive with doing something like this. Our team is experiencing some issues, not just with QB play, but all over the field, and you don't pull some idiotic move like benching your starting QB in order to "fix" something. The only fix is people playing better, both in individual effort, and as a group. Our OL is the most troubling issue right now, not the QB. QBs don't function well behind a shaky OL. The running game can't get going behind that OL. And what is Kubes doing? Running Foster up the gut into the backs of an OL that isn't getting any push or opening any holes.

And how, exactly, does benching Schaub fix any of those issues? I think our team is probably reeling a little bit from our recent troubles, and doing anything that hurts the morale of this team and makes them question the sanity of the coaching staff (aside from Kubiak's horrible playcalling) would make everyone in the country point at us and laugh like we just pissed ourselves while standing outside a restroom.

Schaub is not the QB we want...very few teams have the QB they want, but he's the QB we have and can be successful if other aspects of the game are working well. The basic fundamentals of the game call for a good OL with the ability to establish the run in order to open up the passing game. If that's working, QBs have an easier job, and Schaub is one of those guys who HAS to be comfortable and get in his rhythm to be effective. Do I like this limitation of us and the way he stiffens up and forces things when the OL/RBs aren't effective early? Hell no. We've seen that if we start off slow and we have issues getting a rush going, we will likely lose if going against a team that can score. We can't play from behind if we haven't put up over 20 points already.

But that unfortunate situation has happened only 3 times so far this season, with a few wins that presented a challenge due to our D falling down a bit. So to change things with the very last game meaning so much to our team, you go with your best chance of winning, and in 13 instances we won with Schaub and only lost 3 times. You make the smart play. Like, for instance, if you're on the goal line, you should PROBABLY run the damn ball to get the TD. Unless you're Kubiak. But I digress.

You don't set yourself on fire, run around like a chicken with your head cut off and burn everything to the ground in the face of adversity. Damn. Half the league would love to have Schaub as their QB. That doesn't make him great or elite, but that means we're heading to the playoffs once again. If Schaub starts stumbling next year, then there might be a time to see Yates to mix things up. I'm far more concerned with our line play on both sides of the ball.
 
I voted option 3 because we should be able to beat the Colts either way. If we can't, then it doesn't matter. If I was the head coach, I wouldn't sit Matt, and you can bet he will start and play to the very end no matter what the score. The offense is going backwards at exactly the wrong time here, while the defense seems to be at least stablized or slightly improving.

Defense does win championships, but not against Manning or Brady. You need both to beat those guys.
 
On Sunday, TJ was in for two plays... and he fumbled on both of them. He has a QB rating of 11. ELEVEN!

I'm not even going to dignify this absurd poll with a vote.

Have to agree with ya on this one.

Why in the hell would we put our starting QB on the sidelines to embarrass him like that and take away his confidence and the team's confidence in him right before the playoffs?? That would break our entire team apart and have everyone questioning the future of this team. The Texans are 12-3 with the best record in the NFL other then the Falcons with Matt Schaub. GP, I love you man but this is by far one of the craziest things you have ever suggested and a total knee jerk reaction especially after by your own admission yates looked horrible in pre season. You're completely giving up on our season when we're having the best season we've ever had. I'll enjoy it while I still have a chance to.
 
This is a dumb question.

It would be one thing if we were already out of the playoffs, and had big questions about the future. We aren't. We are playing for the #1 seed, and will have a home playoff game, and maybe more. If anything, let Schaub play so he can feel comfortable with himself.

The guy played a bad game. His worst of the season. What would that do to his moral if he were to be benched? Mentally, he wouldn't be the same. Let him play, and he could possibly go in to the playoffs feeling better about his ability.

Although, if he were to play a bad game, I wouldn't doubt his ability to get his head back in the game anyway. He is a mentally tough QB, and is a good leader.

Seriously, this entire board has been acting like we are outside of the playoff bubble with a huge scenario to get in. The sky is not falling. It is not.
 
Put me in the "This is a stupid idea" group. This team is playing for the #1 seed. Benching Schaub and playing Yates for even a half can ruin the Texans Super Bowl chances this season (#3 seed would mean traveling to NE for the divisional round). This has to be the craziest idea I've heard...
 
Not a chance. This is an important game. If HFA was locked up, then I would want Yates to start because I would want him to get reps just in case. But HFA is on the line, so you play the best QB on the roster. Schaub may not be the best QB in the NFL, but he's the best one on the roster.

Now, if they come out and jump up 28-3 at the half, then Yates in the second half might be good.
 
I dont think this is as bad of an idea as most of these fanboys do. I love the texans as much as the next guy, but atm schaub is showing us nothing. I can go into all the specifics, but we know the details. Perhaps schaub can use a brief hiatus because he's not himself. Although noone in the right mind ever had visions of schaub truly being elite, but the same goes for him playing this poorly. IMO schaub is not the "superbowl" answer, maybe with an elite defense, but our D is far from that. Geez, so many texans playing like dog poo... Put the freaking segways in the garage, cancel that players show, burn the letter jackets, AND IT'S TIME TO START ACTING LIKE FOCUSED PROFESSIONALS. get down to business, no more childs play.
 
Not one of your better ideas, GP. I understand the sentiment, but I don't think you thought this one out, fully.

We're in the last game of the season, playing for HFA. Ya dance with the one who brung ya. Hopefully, we win get our 1st win, ever, in Indy. This is the time to do it. They look to be tough for the next 15 years, or so.
 
I"m not a big fan of Schaub as a starting QB at this point, but it is what it is. He's the starter..Kubiak is the coach.

I don't want either one of them relieved of their duties at this point in the year. They need to figure this **** out for the play-offs.
 
I want the Texans to go in another direction and am not a fan of Matt Schaub. Doesn't matter though because I don't want change for change's sake and insofar as the 2012 season is concerned we live or die with Matt Schaub. Yates isn't going to pull a Colin Kaepernick on us and come out and win games. He's not that good. He's more mobile (That's a +), less experienced (BIG -) version of the guy he'd be replacing.

Nope. We need to start looking for a QB...... after the season is over. Not right now.

That's how I see it at least.
 
Stuff....funny picture.....more stuff......

Schaub is not the QB we want...very few teams have the QB they want, but he's the QB we have and can be successful if other aspects of the game are working well. The basic fundamentals of the game call for a good OL with the ability to establish the run in order to open up the passing game. If that's working, QBs have an easier job, and Schaub is one of those guys who HAS to be comfortable and get in his rhythm to be effective. Do I like this limitation of us and the way he stiffens up and forces things when the OL/RBs aren't effective early? Hell no. We've seen that if we start off slow and we have issues getting a rush going, we will likely lose if going against a team that can score. We can't play from behind if we haven't put up over 20 points already.

But that unfortunate situation has happened only 3 times so far this season, with a few wins that presented a challenge due to our D falling down a bit. So to change things with the very last game meaning so much to our team, you go with your best chance of winning, and in 13 instances we won with Schaub and only lost 3 times. You make the smart play. Like, for instance, if you're on the goal line, you should PROBABLY run the damn ball to get the TD. Unless you're Kubiak. But I digress.

You don't set yourself on fire, run around like a chicken with your head cut off and burn everything to the ground in the face of adversity. Damn. Half the league would love to have Schaub as their QB. That doesn't make him great or elite, but that means we're heading to the playoffs once again. If Schaub starts stumbling next year, then there might be a time to see Yates to mix things up. I'm far more concerned with our line play on both sides of the ball.


Took me to that place....

schaub-2.jpg


Because he's the QB Houston deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hate him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a watchful guardian. A slow-footed protector. A Dork Knight.
 
Took me to that place....

schaub-2.jpg


Because he's the QB Houston deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hate him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's an watchful guardian. A slow-footed protector. A Dork Knight.

Lmao
 
Took me to that place....

schaub-2.jpg


Because he's the QB Houston deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hate him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a watchful guardian. A slow-footed protector. A Dork Knight.

ha.. eventhough im not as down on schaub as others, thats pretty funny! at least something good came from this thread

like others, i just voted no since there wasnt any 'this is a retarded idea' option
 
All I know is he played like a scared little school girl in that last game. If at the first sign of pressure he fetals up against Indy his ass needs to be pulled. Kubiak needs to get in his ear and ask him how bad he wants to win. You can say what you want about the blocking up front in the Minnesota game, Schaub packed it in. He played like a :kitten:.

Eh... sort of. I agree his play left a lot to be desired, but I think the thing to fix it is to put the game in his hands & let him know it'll be in his hands throughout the play offs. The game plan from here on out should be pass heavy. Don't sorry about balance. Quick easy passes, a few screens, a run here & there. Keep it up through the first three qtrs. Then run the crap out of it in the fourth.
 
Eh... sort of. I agree his play left a lot to be desired, but I think the thing to fix it is to put the game in his hands & let him know it'll be in his hands throughout the play offs. The game plan from here on out should be pass heavy. Don't sorry about balance. Quick easy passes, a few screens, a run here & there. Keep it up through the first three qtrs. Then run the crap out of it in the fourth.

Schaub is not good enough to execute that game plan
 
Eh... sort of. I agree his play left a lot to be desired, but I think the thing to fix it is to put the game in his hands & let him know it'll be in his hands throughout the play offs. The game plan from here on out should be pass heavy. Don't sorry about balance. Quick easy passes, a few screens, a run here & there. Keep it up through the first three qtrs. Then run the crap out of it in the fourth.

Sorry, but heck no.

The solution is to look for even more balance and hope the OL can go into beast mode in the running game.

We are not winning anything by having Matt Schaub throw 40 times/gm.
 
Sorry, but heck no.

The solution is to look for even more balance and hope the OL can go into beast mode in the running game.

We are not winning anything by having Matt Schaub throw 40 times/gm.

I don't know that he'll necessarily have to throw it 40 times a game. When the game is over, the numbers will balance out. Get a big lead (points come out of the passing game), then run the heck out of it.

Right now we're asking him to be our safety valve. If the run game doesn't keep us on schedule, we're asking Matt to get us out of third & long. He's not that guy.

Schaub is the single most important guy on this team offensively. He's a rhythm passer. We need to get him into a rhythm & keep him there as long as possible. If he turns it over, the defense will bail us out. This part of the plan is no different than us going 3 & out, or failing to gain more than 30 yards on offense (given our poor starting position).

His best game this year was Denver. He was 17 of 30 for 295 yards. We ran the ball 34 times with Tate & Foster for 152 yards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, but heck no.

The solution is to look for even more balance and hope the OL can go into beast mode in the running game.

We are not winning anything by having Matt Schaub throw 40 times/gm.



This year we are 2-0 when Schaub has 40+ attempts 5-0 with 35+ attempts
 
This year we are 2-0 when Schaub has 40+ attempts 5-0 with 35+ attempts

We're also 7-0 when he has 31 or fewer attempts.

I'll give you three guesses on the three games he barely missed your 35+ mark, but they were all losses...hint, hint....Probably not converting third downs and being pulled before the game was over had something to do with him just missing your mark...

And the 2 games where he has 40+ attempts were both overtime games.
 
I don't know that he'll necessarily have to throw it 40 times a game. When the game is over, the numbers will balance out. Get a big lead (points come out of the passing game), then run the heck out of it.

Right now we're asking him to be our safety valve. If the run game doesn't keep us on schedule, we're asking Matt to get us out of third & long. He's not that guy.

Schaub is the single most important guy on this team offensively. He's a rhythm passer. We need to get him into a rhythm & keep him there as long as possible. If he turns it over, the defense will bail us out. This part of the plan is no different than us going 3 & out, or failing to gain more than 30 yards on offense (given our poor starting position).

His best game this year was Denver. He threw the ball 17 times for 295 yards. We ran the ball 34 times with Tate & Foster for 152 yards.

Sounds to me like you have a gripe with the playcalling. It's not an issue of how often we throw for you, but when we throw...You want us to throw it more early...

I can get behind that...

Kubiak has done that a bit this year though...Come out throwing the ball a bunch. You are right, we look like a better team when that happens.
 
We're also 7-0 when he has under 31 or fewer attempts.

I'll give you three guesses on the three games he barely missed your 35+ mark, but they were all losses...hint, hint....Probably not converting third downs and being pulled before the game was over had something to do with him just missing your mark...

And the 2 games where he has 40+ attempts were both overtime games.



Do you know how many attempts Matt had in the OT against Jacksonville? 14 which means he posted 41 in reg. In the lions game he had 10 attemps putting him at 38 for reg. Point being is that we certainly can win with Schaub and 40 attempts. In truth if we get to 40ish attempts its typically not because of Schaub so that does put us in a bad spot but 40 attempts doesnt equal a loss and the numbers show it for this season


my guess on the lower end attempt games our running game was working, on the mid games the running game wasnt the best and/or we got behind, on the 35+ games it would also be running games/d issues
 
Do you know how many attempts Matt had in the OT against Jacksonville? 14 which means he posted 41 in reg. In the lions game he had 10 attemps putting him at 38 for reg. Point being is that we certainly can win with Schaub and 40 attempts. In truth if we get to 40ish attempts its typically not because of Schaub so that does put us in a bad spot but 40 attempts doesnt equal a loss and the numbers show it for this season

So many things wrong with your post.

The first point about OT is that we were in shootouts in both and both those teams had a chance to win in OT....If that in your mind equals some kind of formula for success I don't know what to tell you.... It means that we were forced to throw the ball around because we had to. Not because that is what the game plan called for. And in both of those games the other teams had opprotunities to win in OT because of Schaub throwing the ball around so much. If you think that is a recipe for success then you don't know what you are watching. The reason that the numbers show it is because those teams (two non-play off teams) failed to capitalize when we gave them an opprotunity...Or you could give credit to the defense for making stops when they needed it...
 
So many things wrong with your post.

The first point about OT is that we were in shootouts in both and both those teams had a chance to win in OT....If that in your mind equals some kind of formula for success I don't know what to tell you.... It means that we were forced to throw the ball around because we had to. Not because that is what the game plan called for. And in both of those games the other teams had opprotunities to win in OT because of Schaub throwing the ball around so much. If you think that is a recipe for success then you don't know what you are watching. The reason that the numbers show it is because those teams (two non-play off teams) failed to capitalize when we gave them an opprotunity...Or you could give credit to the defense for making stops when they needed it...



Usually in OT both teams have a chance to win as typically in OT the score is pretty close from the get go. Also I think FG gave the other team a chance to win not just Schaub. Point being we can and have won with 40 attempts with Schaub. Use whatever other monday morning view you want and the fact remains we won both games with Schaub throwing 40+ times something you said we simply cant do.
 
We are not winning anything by having Matt Schaub throw 40 times/gm.

Yeah, it sucks we are ione of 29 teams whose QBs don't throw 40 times a game and not one of the 3 whose do - none of which will be in the playoffs this season.
 
Usually in OT both teams have a chance to win as typically in OT the score is pretty close from the get go. Also I think FG gave the other team a chance to win not just Schaub. Point being we can and have won with 40 attempts with Schaub. Use whatever other monday morning view you want and the fact remains we won both games with Schaub throwing 40+ times something you said we simply cant do.

So youre big example of Schaub throwing a bunch and winning is vs the 9th WORSE pass defense in Jacksonville, and an average Lions defense? Throw in we had 150-200 YARDS RUSHING those days and you have exactly what we've been saying, when the run game excels Matt is ADEQUATE, when it doesn't, Matt is garbage (Packers, Patriots, Vikings)
 
Yeah, it sucks we are ione of 29 teams whose QBs don't throw 40 times a game and not one of the 3 whose do - none of which will be in the playoffs this season.

That would seem to back up my statement. Thanks.

BTW, pay attention. I haven't once advocated having any QB throwing the ball a bunch.
 
No problem its seemed as though you might have confused fact/opinion here

"We're not running the ball well," Kubiak said. "That was pretty obvious from early in the game. We got into more of a quick count mode, had to get rid of the ball quick because of their pressure. That's the way we had to move the ball the other night. If we run the ball, we'll have our chances to go down the field but it starts with us running it."

http://www.sbnation.com/fantasy/2012/10/18/3521318/andre-johnson-fantasy-football-texans

All these it's ok if Matt throws the ball a bunch posts are a crock of ****. That's not what we do when we are playing our best football.
 
So youre big example of Schaub throwing a bunch and winning is vs the 9th WORSE pass defense in Jacksonville, and an average Lions defense? Throw in we had 150-200 YARDS RUSHING those days and you have exactly what we've been saying, when the run game excels Matt is ADEQUATE, when it doesn't, Matt is garbage (Packers, Patriots, Vikings)



Matt did post a 78.8% completion rate, even against a poor team thats pretty damn good. I think I address the running game and impact it has on our team
 
Back
Top