Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Depending on what hairy situation you find yourself stuck in....a toilet bowl is more valuable than gold. A toilet bowl can be the most valuable thing on earth. :vincepalm:That's like saying gold is more valuable than a toilet bowl
So you think Kubiak is more valuable than Wade? There is nothing wrong with this thread, because it speaks the truth.Here's to hoping Arian Foster puts up 800 yards in 4 Jan./Feb. games...
Nah, we'd still have threads like this. Never mind.
I think they are both valuable, to be honest.So you think Kubiak is more valuable than Wade? There is nothing wrong with this thread, because it speaks the truth.
Head coaches who have a less than .500 career winning % are easily replaceable. Defensive coordinators who can take a historically bad defense and turn it into one of the top units in the league without even having a offseason are not.I think they are both valuable, to be honest.
Helps when the GM went out and got 2 studs in free agency. Or was Wade Phillips in charge of that, too?Head coaches who have a less than .500 career winning % are easily replaceable. Defensive coordinators who can take a historically bad defense and turn it into one of the top units in the league without even having a offseason are not.
Wade was in charge of the draft....that was his draft and he was the overseer on what type of players he wanted to play in his system so I'm pretty sure he had a big say on the matter. He wanted Aldon Smith (who's a absolute beast for SF) 1st and when he was gone he wanted J.J. Watt (who's another absolute beast) and while he was in Dallas he veiwed Glover Quin as a good safety prospect (not as a corner)....so the man knows defensive talent and where to stick players to give them the best opportunity for success.Helps when the GM went out and got 2 studs in free agency. Or was Wade Phillips in charge of that, too?
Texans Talk fam...Wade was in charge of the draft....that was his draft and he was the overseer on what type of players he wanted to play in his system so I'm pretty sure he had a big say on the matter. He wanted Aldon Smith (who's a absolute beast for SF) 1st and when he was gone he wanted J.J. Watt (who's another absolute beast) and while he was in Dallas he veiwed Glover Quin as a good safety prospect (not as a corner)....so the man knows defensive talent and where to stick players to give them the best opportunity for success.
Well with gold you could buy 50 toliet bowls lolDepending on what hairy situation you find yourself stuck in....a toilet bowl is more valuable than gold. A toilet bowl can be the most valuable thing on earth. :vincepalm:
That's cute...Phillips 6 yard pass to Phillips (Phillips PAT)
Phillips 20, Bengals 19.
There's something else Gary Kubiak is not....... Chuck Noll or Tom Landry.I disagree.
I think both Wade and Gary are top 5 defensive and offensive coaches, respectively.
Gary is no shout & holler head coach -- but neither were Chuck Noll or Tom Landry.
Tell me where I discredited Wade. Don't worry, I'll wait. I say both coaches are valuable, and that, somehow = discrediting Wade.That's cute...
If you want to bury your head in the sand and discredit the impact that Wade has had on this team, then by all means...proceed paddling that canoe on down Da Nile.
Again, that would be 0 meaningfull wins. That's a nice round number.Phillips 6 yard pass to Phillips (Phillips PAT)
Phillips 20, Bengals 19.
"Discredit" implies that you're trying to take credit away from him... Implying that he didn't have anything to do with the players we picked up is trying to take some credit away from him. Implying that Gary Kubiak has had just as much to do with our success this season when he hasn't is trying to take credit away from him. What am I missing here?Tell me where I discredited Wade. Don't worry, I'll wait. I say both coaches are valuable, and that, somehow = discrediting Wade.
Ahh, Texan fans...always going full Aggie on me.
I said they were both valuable. How much or otherwise never came from my keyboard."Discredit" implies that you're trying to take credit away from him... Implying that he didn't have anything to do with the players we picked up is trying to take some credit away from him. Implying that Gary Kubiak has had just as much to do with our success this season is trying to take credit away from him. What am I missing here?
And no... I didn't go full "Kubiak" on you either
Metioning Gary in the same post as a HC on par with Landry/Noll = LMAO.There's something else Gary Kubiak is not....... Chuck Noll or Tom Landry.
So than what's your gripe with this thread, because technically Gary (the O.P. not the coach) never said Kubiak had no value....he simply said Wade was more valuable. Kubiak has some value, he just isn't close to being as valuable as Wade. He'd be on his way to his 7th straight non playoff season and would be out of a job without Wade Phillips. If we sign Kubiak to a extension he should give Wade half his money.I said they were both valuable. How much or otherwise never came from my keyboard.
Impossible to disagree.That is just all there is to it IMHO. What do you say?
You sure about that ..... ?Metioning Gary in the same post as a HC on par with Landry/Noll = LMAO.
I think that WAS what he was implying. "Get rid of Kubiak/Smith" says that to me. But that's neither here nor there.So than what's your gripe with this thread, because technically Gary (the O.P. not the coach) never said Kubiak had no value....he simply said Wade was more valuable. Kubiak has some value, he just isn't close to being as valuable as Wade. He'd be on his way to his 7th straight non playoff season and would be out of a job without Wade Phillips. If we sign Kubiak to a extension he should give Wade half his money.
Not. Dude is a hot chick magnet.I thought garys were supposed to stick together?
Alright, your hot chick privileges are being revoked.
Different timesYou sure about that ..... ?
Landry was 25-53-4 in his first 6 years,
Noll was 43-40-1 in his first 6 years,
Kubiak is 47-48 in his first 6 years.
What are you, a crowd follower?That is just all there is to it IMHO. What do you say?
You sure about that ..... ?
Landry was 25-53-4 in his first 6 years,
Noll was 43-40-1 in his first 6 years,
Kubiak is 47-48 in his first 6 years.
Exactly right.Different times
Different scheduling format
No FA
Most teams can be turned around in4 yrs. Yet here Gary is losing to a 1 win team on national TV 6 yrs later.
Would you be so kind to post a real opinion? Thank you so much.What are you, a crowd follower?
Myopia.Different times
Different scheduling format
No FA
Most teams can be turned around in4 yrs. Yet here Gary is losing to a 1 win team on national TV 6 yrs later.
That's not all there is to my man! Ummm, Wade is good at defense. Gary is good at offense. Gary can't run a defense and Wade can't run an offense. This tag-team is the definition of what Co-Head coaches should be. Unfortunately, there has to be one guy that is named "head" coach, which would be Gary since Wade had a gig at the time the Texans fired Capers...That is just all there is to it IMHO. What do you say?
^Bingo....I also think Wade and Gary together make a great HC.
You mean like you?Would you be so kind to post a real opinion? Thank you so much.
Belichick's first gig in Cleveland was 5 years and that was before the current/modern era of free agency. Even so, he won his first playoff game after his fourth season.Myopia.
Let's hire Jeff Fischer or Bill Belichick.
Fischer was 45-41 in his first six seasons,
Belichick was 41-55 in his first six seasons.
Don't ever **** with my man Gary!!! EVER!!! I miss disagree with some of his posts... That said, NEVER suggest anything Gary does is "worthless"!!You mean like you?
"That is just all there is to it"
worthless thread due to a worthless post.
Chicago Bears"Discredit" implies that you're trying to take credit away from him... Implying that he didn't have anything to do with the players we picked up is trying to take some credit away from him. Implying that Gary Kubiak has had just as much to do with our success this season when he hasn't is trying to take credit away from him. What am I missing here?
And no... I didn't go full "Kubiak" on you either
If Santa did not get you what you wanted then take it up with him not me. Other posters have provided the facts in this thread, so why repeat them? SMH.:vincepalm:You mean like you?
"That is just all there is to it"
worthless thread due to a worthless post.
Gary & Rick?I would not want Wade as HC but Gary should be shown the door along with Rick.
Merry Christmas, friend.You mean like you?
"That is just all there is to it"
worthless thread due to a worthless post.
Overall I just do think they are good enough not just because of this year.Gary & Rick?
Wow.
during our 7 game win streak, winning against all odds, I thought we had a very talented team. I thought we had a chance to win the Super Bowl.
We lose two games & now we want to run Gary & Rick out of town before we have an opportunity to lose our home play-off game?
Wow.... Freak'n Wow.
You sure about that ..... ?
Landry was 25-53-4 in his first 6 years,
Noll was 43-40-1 in his first 6 years,
Kubiak is 47-48 in his first 6 years.
On the other hand, Tom Landry didn't accomplish a .500 season record until his sixth year.Exactly right.
And, by the way, Noll won his first Super Bowl in his sixth year.
But, again, he didn't have the advantage of free agency.On the other hand, Tom Landry didn't accomplish a .500 season record until his sixth year.
that no free agency "point" is a red herring.But, again, he didn't have the advantage of free agency.