Uh oh. Someone used stats.
Thank you, goatcheese. Looking at the past two years, you can see the difference between the two. It's fairly stark. The one angle is the fewer kicks by Rackers, but that's negligible to me.
What's a kick in the crotch, though, is that a FG kicker is still a FG kicker. No matter who he is, he could goat it in a game that decides your team's fate.
I am of the opinion that the NFL needs to do away with FG attempts altogether. You still have kickoffs, but you cannot attempt a FG. Nor can you attempt an extra point kick after a TD. You have to score touchdowns, and you have to attempt 2-point conversions, and this is how you avoid ties and overtime where kickers decide games (when they really should NOT).
I know that's a radical idea, but things change. The NFL is to the point where the game can withstand not having FG attempts. I think fans of all 32 teams would agree that nobody wants THEIR kicker, or another team's kicker either, deciding a playoff or Super Bowl game. Instead, leave it in the hands of the real football players who are out there doing the heavy lifting--If THEY can't get it done, then you know you were beaten fair and square (and not beaten by a guy in a perfectly clean jersey who squeezes the kick right inside the post or right over the cross bar...effectively bastardizingthe other 99.999% of the game).
Down with field goals. They can go play soccer. Remove your kicker from the roster, and have kickoffs be handled by the punter who can choose to kick the ball off a tee or a punt-style kick. Hey, this is a GOOD thing! It opens up an extra roster spot for another position. Bonus.