Texans Pride
Veteran
Just wondering....Silly question...I know!
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Just wondering....Silly question...I know!
There's only a bazillion threads this could've been placed in.
There's only a bazillion threads this could've been placed in.
To answer your question though....Houston will NEVER sign another FA again...in a 100 years. There I'll start off with the first pessimistic post.
Yep, the Bears have now usurped the Redskins in the free agency spending battle. They need to come up with their own Bears' version of this shirt:
It's hard to outspend everyone into the Super Bowl because teams tend to keep their best, non-disgruntled, playing up to their paycheck, hard-working players.
Right on, TC.
Is there a case to be made in the NFL for spending your way to a championship? If so, where has it worked?
If someone could point out the team that has broken the bank during free agency and had a big payoff with the high-dollar roster, I'd like to see it.
Has such a thing happened yet?
I'm not an apologist for the Texans. There are dozens of things I wanted them to do differently from day one.
But it seems to me the proven method of building a winning franchise in the era of free agency is to fill holes with mid-level players and to make a big splash very sparingly.
Lets see... The New Orleans Saints...
I can think of at least 3 or 4 major acquisitions they've made either through trades or FAs that put them over the top...
Drew Brees
Mike Bell
Jeremy Shockey
Darren Sharper
Jabari Greer
etc
Lets see... The New Orleans Saints...
I can think of at least 3 or 4 major acquisitions they've made either through trades or FAs that put them over the top...
Drew Brees
Mike Bell
Jeremy Shockey
Darren Sharper
Jabari Greer
etc
I think he was talking about high dollar free agents. NOLA just kicked ass in the front office/draft (well outside of the Jason David signing), but they didn't break the bank.
Teams that spend horrific amounts of money in FA quite often don't pan out for the long run, teams that build a base in the draft and get free agents to fill the holes are much better off.
Agreed.
And, I think the Texans are doing this.
championship teams are built through the draft AND free agency. You can't rely solely on one or the other, and if you are unbalenced on either side, you could have problems. Teams that spend horrific amounts of money in FA quite often don't pan out for the long run, teams that build a base in the draft and get free agents to fill the holes are much better off.
Vikings didn't win a championship but got very close
Hutchinson
Favre
Taylor
Winfield
P.Williams
K.Williams
J.Allen
Jets same as above
FA
Faneca Woody, Douglas, Scott, Leonhard,Pace
Trades
Sanchez,Jones,Edwards,Greene
Teams that win make moves in FA/Trades. Teams that dont make moves make excuses.
How would you describe the Texans as an organization?
Let me clarify, when I asked if the Texans would do anything via FA, I didn't mean just high dollar players....I'd like to see them bring in some quality players that can help this team.
Like Bernard Pollard?
I know, I know. That's one of their few claims to quiet brilliance.
But are we going to ignore the quiet, great moves just so we can ***** about the lack of bold moves?
That's all well and good including FA to build a team, but it also matters what the FA crop looks like... This year's FA crop looks like dog **** stuck in between the treads of your tennis shoes..
They got luck that the Chiefs were stupid enough to cut Pollard. Even then they waited 2 weeks to sign him. They only signed him after Barber Screwed up the C.Johnson long receiving TD.
Name one impact player that has been signed by the Texans in FA. ?
Not street FA's.
championship teams are built through the draft AND free agency. You can't rely solely on one or the other, and if you are unbalenced on either side, you could have problems. Teams that spend horrific amounts of money in FA quite often don't pan out for the long run, teams that build a base in the draft and get free agents to fill the holes are much better off.
I think we're going to see Smith pick up some players that get cut from other teams. Often fans think these players are scrubs, but good players are cut all the time. One example, in this uncapped year, are those players earning high $'s and the team wants to save. We've seen players get released already that were due bonuses by a certain date. Around draft time and camp time, teams will have a better idea of the players they have and where to save/spend money.
I think we're going to see Smith pick up some players that get cut from other teams. Often fans think these players are scrubs, but good players are cut all the time. One example, in this uncapped year, are those players earning high $'s and the team wants to save. We've seen players get released already that were due bonuses by a certain date. Around draft time and camp time, teams will have a better idea of the players they have and where to save/spend money.
We agree about this FA class.
Although there were some vet FA RB's that could make an impact.
Taylor,T.Jones and LT for example.
Kevin Walter
And who cares how and why Pollard got here and became a starter.... That's just nitpicking, you think Cardinal fans were upset at their front office/coaching staff for not signing Warner to a huge deal and starting him from the get go after he became such a surprise for them...
Fact is, the dude (Pollard) was a FA they signed and he more than made his fair share of plays for them. Andre Daivs also made plays his first year here....signing him to another contract was the mistake.
While I don't wanna split hairs, 'cause I'm old and fixin to hit the hay... Those running backs were 30+. A) We've seen that before (Ahman Green), B) When it's over for RB's, it's generally over. They tend to drop off quickly... Would I like LT or Thomas Jones a Texan?? Hellz yeah!! As a complimentary back - YES!!
*EDIT*
I'm out for tonight
Here's some offseason moves the Texans have done since Kubiak has been here (free agents and restricted free agents). Good and/or bad, just naming some:
1. Traded two 2nd round picks for Matt Schaub - 6 years $48MM
2. Traded a 7th round pick for Kevin Walter - re-signed for 5 years $21.5MM
2. Traded a 5th round pick for Eric Moulds - 4 years $14MM
3. Traded a 6th round pick for Chris Myers - 4 years $11MM
FA Antonio Smith - 5 years $35.5MM
FA Anthony Weaver - 5 years $26.5MM
FA Ahman Green - 4 years $23MM
FA Jacques Reeves - 5 years $20MM
FA Andre Davis - re-signed for 4 years $16MM
FA Eugene Wilson - 3 years $11.3MM
Matched NY's offer for Vonta Leach (previously FA) - 4 years $8MM
Matched Denver's offer for David Anderson (previously FA) - 3 years $4.5MM
And I'd be remiss if I didn't mention we outbid every other team for Ron Dayne.
I'm surprised no one has brought up the misspelling of "Walter"
Even though change doesn't necessarily assure progress, progress does not occur without change. As Thomas Edison once said, "Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress." However, over the years as I see it, the only response of restlessness and discontent has been demonstrated by the fans................ 8 years and counting.
A Jones and Hardesty in the 3rd would be a great Tandem. IMHO
Give me Fargas and Hardesty. They wouid be alot like Jones and Greene were for the Jets last year.
Although Huggy Bear Jr is 30 he doesn't have alot of miles on him.
Lets see... The New Orleans Saints...
I can think of at least 3 or 4 major acquisitions they've made either through trades or FAs that put them over the top...
Drew Brees
Mike Bell
Jeremy Shockey
Darren Sharper
Jabari Greer
etc
Right on, TC.
Is there a case to be made in the NFL for spending your way to a championship? If so, where has it worked?
If someone could point out the team that has broken the bank during free agency and had a big payoff with the high-dollar roster, I'd like to see it.
Has such a thing happened yet?
The only example I can think of is the 1994 49ers.
Most of those guys had issues when the Saints took them. I don't know if any of them are uber-paid.
Shockey wore out his welcome as a Giant because not only was he a knucklehead, he was hurt.
Nobody came after Brees because he just had a surgically repaired throwing shoulder.
Mike Bell pretty much didn't do anything outside of Denver...remember his illustrious Texans career. He's not a huge moneymaker either.
Greer...nice CB but he didn't command a huge paycheck from the Saints when he signed.
Sharper is 34 years old. He fit their system. He just had knee surgery. He signed a one year deal with the Saints last year...
Basically, they didn't throw money at the big name free agents. They took chances on players and those players panned out. Tom Benson's not spending like Dan Snyder or Jerry Jones.
Rick Smith? Got Schaub. Took a chance on Pollard. Got decent play out of DelJuan Robinson and Zgonina. Drafted some nice players (looking past his propensity to draft TE's though). There's still some work to do, but your Saints championship team got players that weren't first or second choices for other teams. That's probably the right call to make.
Lets see
1.Brees slightly better than Schaub
2. Bell > than any RB on the Texans roster last year
3. Shockey > than OD Eight games dont make a season, Shockey contributed the entire season
4. Sharper=Pollard They were both difference maker on their teams.
5. Greer>Robinson It's sad that Dunta got 10 mil for 1 yr, while the Saints locked up Greer for 4 yrs 22 mil. Smith compounded this mistake by not signing Bodden to a reasonable deal this offseason.
6. Hargrove > Del Robinson Hargrove was better than any DT on the Texans.
7.McCray = Barwin Both added depth and playmaking abilities at DE. Barwin has more upside.