Hervoyel said:
I honestly can't think of a QB who I think is a) overrated, and b) has been in the league 5 years at least. I know there's one out there and it will probably come to me after I hit the "Post Quick Reply" button. I'm just drawing a blank for some reason.
That reason is I have a QB question on my mind inspired by the responses in this thread. People ask you to name the best QB and it's usually pretty easy. They ask you to name the most overrated and everyone has an opinion (even me if I could just remember what it was). Likewise everyone can tell you who the busts were.
So would everyone please name one QB who was, in your opinion, basically a victim of the team who drafted him. Name the best QB who's talents were completely squandered because he played on a lousy team or for crummy coaches. Maybe he played in a bad system or got no protection, or he was put in a no-win situation and asked to follow a legend.
Name the one guy who didn't work out who you think would have IF he'd been in a better situation.
Vinny already named one but I'll name another - Trent Dilfer
Those early Tampa teams he played on were terrible. About the time they started to come around (and Dilfer's stats were improving), they released him. Everybody said when he got to Baltimore all he had to do was not lose games. But if you look at his stats from that season...
134/226 (59.3%), 1502 yards, 12 TDs, 11 INTs, 76.6 rating
His yards and TDs are low but look at his number of attempts. He had a pretty high completion percentage as well. His rating was still respectable despite the high number of INTs.
rittenhouserobz said:
I will disagree about Leaf being overrated. He was picked very high which means he was rated high, but did not perform even close to expectations. That makes him overrated. But he is also a bust.
BTW Akili Smith was also a bust and overrated. Brian Bosworth is another name that pops up.
I just think that the terms "bust" and "over-rated" are very closely related.
If this is your view, then I can see how you would think "bust" and "overrated" are closely related.
To me, a player's draft position usually has a lot to do with how they performed in college. So in a way, they
earned that draft position. So they can't be considered "overrated" based on where they were drafted.
Now you can say a player is "overrated" if he's drafted higher than you think he ought to be. But that doesn't have anything to do with their performance on the field in the NFL because they have yet to take the field. So they can't be classified as a "bust". At least not yet anyway.
And if they don't pan out after being drafted high, then they're certainly considered to be busts.
And you don't have to be a "bust" to be "overrated". Most would consider Donovan McNabb to be a pretty good QB. But for the 2003 season, he had just 16 TDs with 11 INTs and a 79.6 QB rating. Yet he still went to the Pro Bowl that season.
Going to the Pro Bowl means he was "overrated" for that season. But that doesn't mean he's a "bust" as a player.
I see a big difference between the way you and I look at the two different terms.