Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!

Kubiak is INSANE

G

gafftop

All Pro
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein, (attributed)
US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

C'mon Kubiak.
1) The Texans don't have the personnel to blow people out. We have the perfect Oline to be BLOWN OUT. You keep trying to power run the ball in the red zone expecting different results.
2) Chris Brown may be OUR power back, but he isn't a POWER BACK. He does not have a nose for the goal line. Doesn't FIGHT TO GET IN. I would rather see AJ run the wildcat but who wouldn't. You don't have to be big to be a good goal line back. It may help, but you need more.
3) Kubiak do not feel the definition of a successful is being able to run the ball 1 yard anytime you want to. We as fans will be happy with a win any way you get it. You have a team that can get in the position to WIN, you as a coach needs to UNDERSTAND YOUR TEAMS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES and create plays that will make this team effective in the RED ZONE and throughout the game.
4) For someone who values the RUN GAME you sure don't try to bring any talented running backs in. You could have had BENSON, maybe TAYLOR, even Adrian Peterson during the draft, but showed absolutely no interest in any of them.
What is you problem.
5) You kept trotting Fred Bennett out expecting different results.
6) You keep thinking you can be successful with your undersized line.
7) KUBIAK READ THE ABOVE ABOUT INSANITY AGAIN. REALLY THINK ABOUT, HARD.

I think the problem is the fans can see that this team is capable of more,
BUT THE COACHING IS KEEPING THEM FROM REACHING THEIR FULL POTENTIAL. If the talent on the team was just bad then there would not be as big an uproar. thanks
 
Last edited:
gafftop said:
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein, (attributed)
US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

C'mon Kubiak.
1) The Texans don't have the personnel to blow people out. We have the perfect Oline to be BLOWN OUT.
2) Chris Brown may be OUR power back, but he isn't a POWER BACK. He does not have a nose for the goal line. Doesn't FIGHT TO GET IN. I would rather see AJ run the wildcat but who wouldn't. You don't have to be big to be a good goal line back. It may help, but you need more.
3) Kubiak do not feel the definition of a successful is being able to run the ball 1 yard anytime you want to. We as fans will be happy with a win any way you get it. You have a team that can get in the position to WIN, you as a coach needs to UNDERSTAND YOUR TEAMS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES and create plays that will make this team effective in the RED ZONE and throughout the game.
4) For someone who values the RUN GAME you sure don't try to bring any talented running backs in. You could have had BENSON, maybe TAYLOR, even Adrian Peterson during the draft, but showed absolutely no interest in any of them.
What is you problem.
5) You kept trotting Fred Bennett out expecting different results.
6) KUBIAK READ THE ABOVE ABOUT INSANITY AGAIN. REALLY THINK ABOUT, HARD.

I think the problem is the fans can see that this team is capable of more,
BUT THE COACHING IS KEEPING THEM FROM REACHING THEIR FULL POTENTIAL. If the talent on the team was just bad then their would not be as big an uproar. thanks
Click to expand...

That's not true at all. People would complain about that as well, hell....look at your own post. You're complaining about the talent of some of our players. It's human nature, people are going to complain. We could have been winning these close games and some would still complain that we should have not had them so close. We should have had blowouts, etc. Complainers complain.....period.
 
You are probably right. But I would not be focusing on the coaching decisions as much because they would not be a major factor in determining the outcome of individual games. This team finally has a chance to compete and COACHING DECISIONS CAN AND HAVE BEEN CRITICAL IN DETERMINING THE OUTCOME.
thanks
 
I don't have a problem with not going RB in FA, but if you want to be this unstopable running team, them make the picks in the draft. Build that way. Don't build a team that uses smallish Linemen who are better pass blockers then try and become a hammer at the hardest part of the field to be the hammer. Makes no damn sense. He keep arrogantly shaking his fist proclaiming we're gonna keep plugging away just like we are. It's getting tired.:beerfunnel:
 
Gary: That's not a bad idea.
Bush: What?
Gary: Making a Defensive Tackle. Actually making a Defensive Tackle. Like Frankenstein... except cuter.
Bush: [stands up] You're serious?
[Gary grabs Bush by the collar and pulls him towards him]
Gary: Look me in the eye. Do I look serious?
Bush: Gary Kubiak, that's-that's Fangio ****! That's sick! I am not digging up dead DTs!
[Gary puts his hand over Bush's mouth and sits him down on the training table]
Gary: No, I'm not talking about digging up dead DTs, Frank. I'm talking about your system, *****, your computer!

[Gary is chanting incoherently. Bush seemed very confused by his best friend's odd behaviour. They are both wearing bras on their heads]
Bush: Gary?... By the way, why are we wearing bras on our heads?
Gary: [hesitates] Ceremonial.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090305/quotes
 
The definition of insanity is to keep running Alex Gibbs guys in Alex Gibbs plays and expecting a different result.
 
Kaiser Toro said:
Gary: That's not a bad idea.
Bush: What?
Gary: Making a Defensive Tackle. Actually making a Defensive Tackle. Like Frankenstein... except cuter.
Bush: [stands up] You're serious?
[Gary grabs Bush by the collar and pulls him towards him]
Gary: Look me in the eye. Do I look serious?
Bush: Gary Kubiak, that's-that's Fangio ****! That's sick! I am not digging up dead DTs!
[Gary puts his hand over Bush's mouth and sits him down on the training table]
Gary: No, I'm not talking about digging up dead DTs, Frank. I'm talking about your system, *****, your computer!

[Gary is chanting incoherently. Bush seemed very confused by his best friend's odd behaviour. They are both wearing bras on their heads]
Bush: Gary?... By the way, why are we wearing bras on our heads?
Gary: [hesitates] Ceremonial.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090305/quotes
Click to expand...

Must spread Rep. But the Weird Science reference was awesome!! Nice work
 
gafftop said:
1) The Texans don't have the personnel to blow people out. We have the perfect Oline to be BLOWN OUT. You keep trying to power run the ball in the red zone expecting different results.
Click to expand...

Yes we do. The Oilers did it with the run n shoot, the Rams did it in the late 90's. The Cardinals did it last year. What we don't have is the personnel to control the clock the way most coaches would like. And they only tried "power running" a couple of times. There were two passes on that goalline stand that people seem to keep overlooking. Oh, and there's the fact that it had worked perfectly on the first try a couple of quarters earlier.

3) Kubiak do not feel the definition of a successful is being able to run the ball 1 yard anytime you want to. We as fans will be happy with a win any way you get it. You have a team that can get in the position to WIN, you as a coach needs to UNDERSTAND YOUR TEAMS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES and create plays that will make this team effective in the RED ZONE and throughout the game.
Click to expand...

We only failed once in the red zone all day. 3 touchdowns and a field goal try should be enough to win damn near any game. The biggest problem was the defensive breakdown in the last 2 minutes of the first half.


4) For someone who values the RUN GAME you sure don't try to bring any talented running backs in. You could have had BENSON, maybe TAYLOR, even Adrian Peterson during the draft, but showed absolutely no interest in any of them.
What is you problem.
Click to expand...

Adrian Peterson and Cedric Benson couldn't run behind this line. Steve Slaton had as good a rookie year last year as any in the last decade. Chris Brown is stellar behind a good line when he's healthy. We have "talented running backs". What we don't have is an O-line that can run block.

5) You kept trotting Fred Bennett out expecting different results.
Click to expand...

Was there a Fred Bennett sighting this past Sunday? Because all I saw was Dunta getting burned, Jacques Reeves playing out of his mind, and Glover Quin laying some serious wood.

6) You keep thinking you can be successful with your undersized line.
Click to expand...

They were very successful with it last year. Slaton had something like 1800 yards with the exact same line. Why they can't run it is puzzling. And if being undersized is such a "problem", how do you explain the sensational pass blocking these guys are providing? I don't think it's so much the size as the technique. Something has changed this year and I don't think anybody has quite put their fingers on why it's not working.

I think the problem is the fans can see that this team is capable of more,
BUT THE COACHING IS KEEPING THEM FROM REACHING THEIR FULL POTENTIAL. If the talent on the team was just bad then there would not be as big an uproar. thanks
Click to expand...

Give me a break! I think the fans are just overevaluating the "talent" on this team. Nobody outside of Houston (unless they're diehard NFL fans) has a clue about a single player on this team besides Andre Johnson. You hear Mario's name mentioned, but usually only because of the 2006 draft. The word I think you're looking for is POTENTIAL, not TALENT. The coaching is not PREVENTING them from reaching potential. Please! You're talking about some of the greatest position coaches in the history of this league on this team's staff. They're not "holding anyone back". That's just ridiculous.

I still think most of the blame for the shortcomings of this team are on the individual players, NOT the coaches.
 
When I talk about Blow out, I am talking about blowing the other team off the ball and running the ball at will. I agree we possibly could put alot of points on the board, but this staff won't commit the whole game to doing this. I think this is a mistake.

Fred Bennett was on the field for the 1st 3 games and preseason. Do you really need that much time to see what you have? I agree not on field last week, but c'mon the coaching staff needs to open their eyes.

Was last week the only game you have watched this season? They can't run the ball at will.

We will just disagree on your assessment on us having talented running backs. Slaton was a surprise and I think he is a very good back, especially for the purpose he was originaly drafted for, change of pace. But as a whole I think we are below average on running backs. I think Adrian Peterson or Benson or Taylor would make a difference on this team. We will get a first hand look this weekend on Benson.

Undersized line was focused more towards us trying to force our will on a team , running the ball down their throat.

I do agree with you on the overall talent not being good. We are below avg in the trenches, average/above LBs, Below in secondary, above avg receivers etc. That said I think we have enough this year to compete for a playoff spot. I think coaching can make a difference in the outcome of the game/season. This is the 1st year I think the Texans had/have a chance for the playoffs and it is sad to see bad coaching decisions making a difference.
 
Last edited:
gafftop said:
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein, (attributed)
US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

C'mon Kubiak.
1) The Texans don't have the personnel to blow people out. We have the perfect Oline to be BLOWN OUT. You keep trying to power run the ball in the red zone expecting different results.
2) Chris Brown may be OUR power back, but he isn't a POWER BACK. He does not have a nose for the goal line. Doesn't FIGHT TO GET IN. I would rather see AJ run the wildcat but who wouldn't. You don't have to be big to be a good goal line back. It may help, but you need more.
3) Kubiak do not feel the definition of a successful is being able to run the ball 1 yard anytime you want to. We as fans will be happy with a win any way you get it. You have a team that can get in the position to WIN, you as a coach needs to UNDERSTAND YOUR TEAMS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES and create plays that will make this team effective in the RED ZONE and throughout the game.
4) For someone who values the RUN GAME you sure don't try to bring any talented running backs in. You could have had BENSON, maybe TAYLOR , even Adrian Peterson during the draft, but showed absolutely no interest in any of them.
What is you problem.
5) You kept trotting Fred Bennett out expecting different results.
6) You keep thinking you can be successful with your undersized line.
7) KUBIAK READ THE ABOVE ABOUT INSANITY AGAIN. REALLY THINK ABOUT, HARD.

I think the problem is the fans can see that this team is capable of more,
BUT THE COACHING IS KEEPING THEM FROM REACHING THEIR FULL POTENTIAL. If the talent on the team was just bad then there would not be as big an uproar. thanks
Click to expand...

Taylor?
 
All said I still think it is a coin flip on whether I think it would be better to get rid of him and start over. The rest of the season will decide this. I have not given up on him, but he surely has not won me over this season. I was pro Kubiak at beginning of season but now I am ambivalent. Big questions
1) Inability to get team ready to play. Both beginning of season against Jets and it seems at the beginning of each game. Can he motivate?
2) Are the players tired of his style? Have they bought into his idea for the team? Are the players tired of Smith? Are they really giving 100%. I know some players are , but you really need all the players to give their all, especially when you are almost there like the Texans are.
3) Overall game plans and play selection on offense.
4) Evaluation and usage of the players, strengths and weaknesses of the team as a whole and getting the best outcome you can get based on them.
But really who wants to hear any more. I'm DONE.
 
DerekLee1 said:
Adrian Peterson and Cedric Benson couldn't run behind this line. Steve Slaton had as good a rookie year last year as any in the last decade. Chris Brown is stellar behind a good line when he's healthy. We have "talented running backs". What we don't have is an O-line that can run block.
Click to expand...

DerekLee1 said:
They were very successful with it last year. Slaton had something like 1800 yards with the exact same line. Why they can't run it is puzzling. And if being undersized is such a "problem", how do you explain the sensational pass blocking these guys are providing? I don't think it's so much the size as the technique. Something has changed this year and I don't think anybody has quite put their fingers on why it's not working.
Click to expand...

I think you just called yourself out in the same post.
 
Eveything is going to be just fine. Expert John McClain said yesterday that Texans will be 4 & 4 midway. The offensive line and Slaton are doing just what they were hired to do, move the ball down the field to Red Zone. The line is comprised of pass blockers not run blockers. Slaton is behind last season but can catch up quick. We signed Brown to be the scoring back. He is not doing what coaches expected.
 
gafftop said:
1) Inability to get team ready to play. Both beginning of season against Jets and it seems at the beginning of each game. Can he motivate?
2) Are the players tired of his style? Have they bought into his idea for the team? Are the players tired of Smith? Are they really giving 100%. I know some players are , but you really need all the players to give their all, especially when you are almost there like the Texans are.
Click to expand...

I've asked myself these same questions and I think he gets the team up for games, but not until their backs are up against the wall.

From what I can tell, his "kids" fight for him when the media and the fans pile on him.


.....but not until then
 
Hell, forget all that I say he's insane based solely on the fact that Andre isn't in the game in a lot of goal line situations.

I need Herm Edwards right now to get in Kubiaks face and ye'll "YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME. YOU PLAAAAY TO WIN THE GAME!!!"
 
Mr. White said:
I've asked myself these same questions and I think he gets the team up for games, but not until their backs are up against the wall.

From what I can tell, his "kids" fight for him when the media and the fans pile on him.


.....but not until then
Click to expand...

Great way to put it.
 
DerekLee1 said:
Yes we do. The Oilers did it with the run n shoot, the Rams did it in the late 90's. The Cardinals did it last year. What we don't have is the personnel to control the clock the way most coaches would like. And they only tried "power running" a couple of times. There were two passes on that goalline stand that people seem to keep overlooking. Oh, and there's the fact that it had worked perfectly on the first try a couple of quarters earlier.



We only failed once in the red zone all day. 3 touchdowns and a field goal try should be enough to win damn near any game. The biggest problem was the defensive breakdown in the last 2 minutes of the first half.




Adrian Peterson and Cedric Benson couldn't run behind this line. Steve Slaton had as good a rookie year last year as any in the last decade. Chris Brown is stellar behind a good line when he's healthy. We have "talented running backs". What we don't have is an O-line that can run block.



Was there a Fred Bennett sighting this past Sunday? Because all I saw was Dunta getting burned, Jacques Reeves playing out of his mind, and Glover Quin laying some serious wood.



They were very successful with it last year. Slaton had something like 1800 yards with the exact same line. Why they can't run it is puzzling. And if being undersized is such a "problem", how do you explain the sensational pass blocking these guys are providing? I don't think it's so much the size as the technique. Something has changed this year and I don't think anybody has quite put their fingers on why it's not working.



Give me a break! I think the fans are just overevaluating the "talent" on this team. Nobody outside of Houston (unless they're diehard NFL fans) has a clue about a single player on this team besides Andre Johnson. You hear Mario's name mentioned, but usually only because of the 2006 draft. The word I think you're looking for is POTENTIAL, not TALENT. The coaching is not PREVENTING them from reaching potential. Please! You're talking about some of the greatest position coaches in the history of this league on this team's staff. They're not "holding anyone back". That's just ridiculous.

I still think most of the blame for the shortcomings of this team are on the individual players, NOT the coaches.
Click to expand...

BWA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

Oh. That wasn't a joke. Are you serious?

What gives you any kind of indication Brown, healthy and stellar belong in the same sentence?

By the way, most backs tend to look good when they're healthy and run behind a good line. Outside of Slaton you really think we've got good backs?

On the last bolded statement. At what point do you start to say...well this IS Kubiak's team. He assembled this roster and this staff. At what point do we start to... I dunno as him to win with his "kids"?
 
Goldensilence said:
BWA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

Oh. That wasn't a joke. Are you serious?

What gives you any kind of indication Brown, healthy and stellar belong in the same sentence?

By the way, most backs tend to look good when they're healthy and run behind a good line. Outside of Slaton you really think we've got good backs?

On the last bolded statement. At what point do you start to say...well this IS Kubiak's team. He assembled this roster and this staff. At what point do we start to... I dunno as him to win with his "kids"?
Click to expand...


When you really think about it, everyone thought that Kubes was going to bring this great Denver running game to Houston when he came here. He has had one good running game in 4 seasons now. And running the ball is supposed to be his bread and butter that leads up to his play action when he wants to pass. He has always said that he's committed to running the ball, and that's always bothered me. I know how important running the ball is, but if you don't have good RB's to run the ball or a good O line to block for your runners, then why be committed to running the ball? It's that typical stubborn coach's syndrome that I can't stand with a lot of coaches for different reasons. The first two seasons Kubes was here drove me nuts, because we didn't have anyone that could run the ball or that good of run blocking either and we still tried to keep running it. This year, we have a good RB, but we just don't have an O line that can open up the holes. Slaton can run inside just fine, but he needs some holes to run through. But again, a coach that is committed to the run as Kubiak is, and has only had one season out of 4 where the rushing attack was good, is pretty bad.
 
Texans - 310.4 lbs average.

Miami - 315.4 lbs
Giants - 315.2 lbs
Ravens - 317.8 lbs
Jets - 311 lbs

Not sure where some folks get the idea we are running some ballerina line on their weights.
 
Miami C - Jay Grove - 300 pounds
Giants C - O'Hara - 303
Ravens - C - Matt Birk - 309
Jets - C - Mangold - 305

Meyers - 295

Its not like Meyers is tiny either
 
Kubiak will not put pedal down for full game, or our players just can't concentrate for a full game. i do feel Kubiak is doing a little better running the ball now in the red zone. He has figured out what he has and now is pitching out and allowing are backs to find the holes instead of pounding the ball into a hole. Too bad he didn't figure this out a little earlier. Can he learn that he needs to play his A game the WHOLE game. Also is he going to give Matt more leeway in calling audibles? Matt is probably as good as Romo whatever that means. Had a great chance to PU quality FA RB last year, but thought he had all he needed in Slaton, very short sighted. In love with SLOW Chris Brown, he puts no pressure on defense. Is he over his love affair with RB Brown. Again if he learns from his mistakes he will be better next year because he has made alot of them this year. He must learn to play A game for full game. If you are ahead and you get single coverage on AJ, don't be afraid to go for it. Just rambling now.
 
Mr. White said:
From what I can tell, his "kids" fight for him when the media and the fans pile on him.


.....but not until then
Click to expand...

Then I suggest we save all of these fire Kubiak threads until the first game of next season and start posting them again. And continue posting them until the end of the season. :kitten: Could work
 
It is his NATURE. Some things never change. I think I was saying the same thing the year before but I don't know how to go back further. I think Kubiak wants to be fired so he can go to Broncos and have a big payday. Don't laugh.
 
Mr. White said:
I've asked myself these same questions and I think he gets the team up for games, but not until their backs are up against the wall.

From what I can tell, his "kids" fight for him when the media and the fans pile on him.


.....but not until then
Click to expand...

What a difference a year makes.

The "kids" don't care what anyone says this year. They only fight each other nowadays.
 
Kaiser Toro said:
Bush: Gary?... By the way, why are we wearing bras on our heads?
Click to expand...
I couldn't come up with the movie until I read that line. I haven't seen that in 20 years.
Double Barrel said:
I think you just called yourself out in the same post.
Click to expand...
I think he was referring to a Madden simulation he did last year.
HoustonFrog said:
I see my insanity quote to the letter I sent to Bob is becoming popular
Click to expand...
I still don't think it was Einstein that said this. Is it from a book, speech, interview?
 
gafftop said:
This thread was started over 1 year ago. The reason I posted was to let people know Kubiak was the same LAST year, and there is no reason to think he will change.
Click to expand...

Wow, I'm the plagiarizer..lol. Hadn't seen it. Smart OP.

Lucky said:
I still don't think it was Einstein that said this. Is it from a book, speech, interview?
Click to expand...

If you google it the first few are Einstein, then Franklin and then some ancient proverb. There is even discussion on whose quote it is. So who knows. It fits though!
 
I didn't look at the date and had no idea this was a thread from last year. I was reading right along until I saw Dunta's name... I had a "What tha?" moment and looked at the date finally.

Scary how the same problems keep coming back up.
 
HoustonFrog said:
Wow, I'm the plagiarizer..lol. Hadn't seen it. Smart OP.



If you google it the first few are Einstein, then Franklin and then some ancient proverb. There is even discussion on whose quote it is. So who knows. It fits though!
Click to expand...


This is the best attempt to trace the phrase back to Einstein........with dead ends encountered at each turn.

definition of insanity...

According to my research, Einstein was indeed first to use the phrase. Reference is Letters to Solovine: 1906-1955. Clearly this predates the other mentioned source. 11/30/2009 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.22.33.251 (talk)

I see the claim in several unreliable sources on the web, but no response when anyone asks for specific page or context. The GoogleBooks copy of the 1987 edition of Letters to Solovine does not show any instances of the words "insanity" or "insane". Many books quote the letters, but GoogleBooks shows none that quote this aphorism. ~ Ningauble 21:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
I found a 1925 New Yorker that attributes the phrase to writings of Einstein here. I moved the quote to disputed. - Stillwaterising 05:50, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
This however may be a misattribution and the source of modern misattributions (as old New Yorkers became searchable). - Stillwaterising 06:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
That source wasn't right, the text was modern, mentions Kate Bush. I did find an older reference though here. - Stillwaterising 07:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Stillwaterising is correct. The "New Yorker" source is an article by David Sedaris, published in the January 29, 2007 issue.
The earliest quote on google books I found using the phrase "expecting a different" and the word "insanity" was from 1979: 'As Albert Einstein famously put it, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result." ' But there might be some alternate phrasing I haven't thought of (like using the word 'madness' instead of 'insanity', or 'expecting different results' or 'anticipating a different outcome' or whatever) Hypnosifl 08:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Scratch that, google seems to have messed up the date on the source above, which actually seems to be volume 71 of this series, which discusses the 2006 Dubai Ports World operations deal (so unless time travel was involved it can't actually have been published in 1979!) Hypnosifl 09:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Alas, as much as I love GoogleBooks, their bibliographic data has so many errors that it simply cannot be taken at face value – always verify. I have been reporting errors via their feedback link, but they are very slow to fix them. I reported this particular error several months ago. (Cf. discussion at Talk:Insanity.) ~ Ningauble 14:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
This page has some interesting speculation about the origin of the phrase, with a lot of people remembering the the phrase being widely used in Alcoholics Anonymous meetings going way back, though I suppose it's possible they only picked it up after reading it in Rita Mae Brown's 1983 book Sudden Death which seems to be the earliest confirmed written version. Too bad google books only features the 1992 edition of The Alcoholics Anonymous pamphlet Step 2: A Promise of Hope, and the original 1980 edition of the book (ISBN 9990108498) seems to be impossible to find when I enter the ISBN on BookFinder or BookHQ...it would be a lead worth following up on! I wonder if it might be possible to get the 1980 edition with an inter-library loan? Hypnosifl 16:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Click to expand...
******************************************
1983 book Sudden Death is the first traceable written documentation of this phrase.


books



books
 
NOTE: THIS QUOTE WAS STARTED OVER A YEAR AGO AND THE SAME THINGS WE COMPLAINED ABOUT ARE STILL HAPPENNING ONLY THIS TIME THE PLAYERS ARE QUITTING. It is time to make a change. I think Kubiak is ready for a change. Deep down he wants to coach Denver. This team has taken on Kubiaks personality PASSIVE and unemotional. I think the players are saying something. They have given up and see no change occuring. A change needs to be made.
 
QUOTE=gafftop;1275507]Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein, (attributed)
US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)
C'mon Kubiak.
1) The Texans don't have the personnel to blow people out. We have the perfect Oline to be BLOWN OUT. You keep trying to power run the ball in the red zone expecting different results.
2) Chris Brown may be OUR power back, but he isn't a POWER BACK. He does not have a nose for the goal line. Doesn't FIGHT TO GET IN. I would rather see AJ run the wildcat but who wouldn't. You don't have to be big to be a good goal line back. It may help, but you need more.
3) Kubiak do not feel the definition of a successful is being able to run the ball 1 yard anytime you want to. We as fans will be happy with a win any way you get it. You have a team that can get in the position to WIN, you as a coach needs to UNDERSTAND YOUR TEAMS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES and create plays that will make this team effective in the RED ZONE and throughout the game.
4) For someone who values the RUN GAME you sure don't try to bring any talented running backs in. You could have had BENSON, maybe TAYLOR, even Adrian Peterson during the draft, but showed absolutely no interest in any of them.
What is you problem.
5) You kept trotting Fred Bennett out expecting different results.
6) You keep thinking you can be successful with your undersized line.
7) KUBIAK READ THE ABOVE ABOUT INSANITY AGAIN. REALLY THINK ABOUT, HARD.

I think the problem is the fans can see that this team is capable of more,
BUT THE COACHING IS KEEPING THEM FROM REACHING THEIR FULL POTENTIAL. If the talent on the team was just bad then there would not be as big an uproar. thanks[/QUOTE]

2009 Post Once insane always insane. See the "cherry coach" MS, Bush,.........

C"MON MCNAIR
 
qqert said:
matt is still our QB.
Click to expand...

My money says that one more pick 6 and we'll see JJ Watt ending any question of Schaub being our starting QB. The injury report will just read "massive trauma to entire body". Did y'all see the look on Watt's face after the last two games? That man does not tolerate losers. Hell, we might actually see Kubiak on the injury report if MS throws another pick 6.
 
This is very knee jerk, but Marty Mornhinweg calls a good offensive game. Y'know, just in case we find ourselves in need of a offensive guru :corrosion:
 
I read a whole page of this thread before I realized it was from 4 years ago.

Holy sheeeet.


How are we in this SAME POSITION 4 years later? So much so that you can legitimately scroll through page 1 not realizing how old this thread is?
 
Vance87 said:
I read a whole page of this thread before I realized it was from 4 years ago.

Holy sheeeet.


How are we in this SAME POSITION 4 years later? So much so that you can legitimately scroll through page 1 not realizing how old this thread is?
Click to expand...

You can't read the OP and not realize how old it is even if the names were removed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top