Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!

We're favored in the first game

OzzO

OzzO

.. and then?
... only 4 months away.

New York Jets (+4) at Houston Texans -- This is the game on which I whiffed badly. I had the Jets as two-point favorites, but it makes sense that they'd be four-point dogs with either a rookie QB (Mark Sanchez) or a bad mediocre QB (Kellen Clemens) likely starting under center.
Click to expand...

Yahoo which pulled the numbers from sportsbook
 
If they still had Favre, they'd be 3 point favorites, and the they'd still lose by 4. This way, they can lose by 10. :fans:
 
"New York Jets (+4) at Houston Texans -- This is the game on which I whiffed badly. I had the Jets as two-point favorites, but it makes sense that they'd be four-point dogs with either a rookie QB (Mark Sanchez) or a bad mediocre QB (Kellen Clemens) likely starting under center. "

he's bad AND mediocre... what a combination. does it work like double negatives or something?
 
well bad is ...bad...obviously.. but mediocre is between bad and good..

So bad mediocre would be...an average QB..but on the lower end of average QBs...

so either he was trying to describe a very specific "ranking" for Clemens..or hes just got **** grammar.

**** grammar +10 over specific ranking
 
Grid said:
well bad is ...bad...obviously.. but mediocre is between bad and good..

So bad mediocre would be...an average QB..but on the lower end of average QBs...

so either he was trying to describe a very specific "ranking" for Clemens..or hes just got **** grammar.

**** grammar +10 over specific ranking
Click to expand...

My money is on **** grammar :)
 
Well, in the article, he crossed out "bad" then put mediocre, so I think he was trying to give a better viewpoint of a not so good situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top