Schaub or Luck for the rest of this season ONLY.

[Topher]

[Showtime100]

[ThaJokaa]

this thread

[JamesBill]

Quarterback hater jamesbill here! When i hate on qb's i love to hate on schaub, but he has been above hate thus far

[EllisUnit]

OK guys very serious question..........

Our defense or the Browns defense

Thats the kind of question u just asked G...^^^ you agree my above question is dumb.

[Showtime100]

Originally Posted by EllisUnit

OK guys very serious question..........

Our defense or the Browns defense

Thats the kind of question u just asked G...^^^ you agree my above question is dumb.

My answer to that?

[ATXtexanfan]

Luck duh. More upside. Plus the kid has the brain to pick up the system in an off-season. Plus he has the arm for plays schaub doesn't. Honestly RGlll would be nasty in this system with the talent around him. Anyone notice schaubs happy feet today? Just asking

[EllisUnit]

Originally Posted by ATXtexanfan

Luck duh. More upside. Plus the kid has the brain to pick up the system in an off-season. Plus he has the arm for plays schaub doesn't. Honestly RGlll would be nasty in this system with the talent around him. Anyone notice schaubs happy feet today? Just asking

Although he did look good today, lets not forget this is also the team the jags almost beat, the same team that made Gabbert look "Improved". Not gonna give him a key to the HOF yet. Based on previous seasons and our 2-0 record i would take schaub. Luck threw 3 picks against the bears who looked good 1 game.

[thunderkyss]

Originally Posted by EllisUnit

OK guys very serious question..........

Our defense or the Browns defense

Thats the kind of question u just asked G...^^^ you agree my above question is dumb.

Not exactly.

I understand the initial reaction to the OP & I agree. This is a complicated offense & Gary has his ways. I don't know that Luck would come in & command this offense the way he appears to have a handle on Indy's.

However, Luck is one talented mofo, much more talented than Schaub. I personally wouldn't trade Luck's talent for Matt's proficiency in our offense & I think that is what gafftop was asking.

Would you take Luck's athleticism over Matt's proficiency?

The Browns defense doesn't have one advantage over ours.

Matt made a few head's up plays today, keeping plays alive, moving the chains. If he keeps that up, keep doing it on a consistent basis, I (a lukewarm Schaub fan) will find it hard to vote against him.

[Allstar]

This season only should be Schaub no questions. From now until forever it should be Luck no questions.

[GP]

Colts installed the Stanford system and the Redskins installed the Baylor system. Both in order to help their QB.

And Schaub is running Kubiak's system.

I'll take Schaub on this question.

[houstonspartan]

Originally Posted by GP

Colts installed the Stanford system and the Redskins installed the Baylor system. Both in order to help their QB.

And Schaub is running Kubiak's system.

I'll take Schaub on this question.

Exactly. Kubiak's offense is complex, and our QB has mastered it. No way I'd take Luck.

People want to hand Luck and Griffith (Can't stand the RGIII nickname nonsense) a Lombardi Trophy. I say let's wait at least until they've played a full season before we start fitting them for championship rings.

[Nawzer]

I would take Schluck.

[aussie_texan]

[AndreJohnson's]

I think we are perfectly fine with Schaub for this year. C'mon! We are 2-0. We don't need luck because we have skill. I don't really think getting rid of schaub and just relying on luck that our backup would be good is a good thing. Never rely on luck.

[HJam72]

Undefeated isn't good enough. We need to give up some wins for a flashy name at QB.

[Speedy]

Originally Posted by HJam72

Undefeated isn't good enough. We need to give up some wins for a flashy name at QB.

Undefeated and winning by 20 every week at that.

[thunderkyss]

Originally Posted by HJam72

Undefeated isn't good enough. We need to give up some wins for a flashy name at QB.

Worked for the Colts.

[HJam72]

Originally Posted by Fiddler

Worked for the Colts.

True.

[GP]

In essence, the Colts and Redskins gave up.

They said, " Aw geez, screw it! We aren't going to ever be able to get a QB to fit us. We'll bend to the QB and do things THEIR way."

That Mike Shanahan gave up, and installed the RGIII Baylor offense...is comical. Desperation time. It might work, granted, but it might not.

Same with the Colts.

Meanwhile, we have a pretty nice system that draws rave reviews from those who know what good NFL offenses look like. D- coordinators are never able to fully defend against it.

I think raw talent, like Cam Newton and RGIII, can maybe push things to the point they get their team to the top echelon.

Luck? He has his work cut out for him. There's a reason Stanford wasn't in the mix for a national title...Luck is not Superman. He just looks like a solid QB to me, not the x- factor he was made out to be. I think there's going to be some major letdown out there at the end if the season.