![]() |
|
|||||||
| Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Age: 20
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 2301
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
2 drunk 2 cook
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the waterin' hole...
Posts: 735
Rep Power: 4922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I want OD here in this offense...
__________________
![]() ...and Hell is coming with them! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think you guys have the wrong picture for how the offense works. Kukiak system has two tight ends. One is a more run-oriented tight end such as Mark Bruenner and Joel Dressen. The other tight end is more receiving oriented like Owen Daniels. Each tight participates in the other area, that is run-oriented tight end catches and pass-oriented tight end receives. However, each has a specialty.
Having said that, Garrett Graham is a receiving-oriented tight end. If he had stepped up, then OD would be expendable. As such, he is currently a backup if OD goes down. I believe if Dreesen is signed by another team (which I do not expect), then the run-oriented starter is not currently on the roster. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SC :(
Section: 308 17/18
Posts: 468
Rep Power: 4269
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But isn't Casey another run-oriented TE? (I mean when he's on the field and not acting as a FB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Casey is a possibility. As a player, he gives the team a lot of flexibility. I think he is likely to remain FB and that they would look some where else to replace Dreesen.
I still believe that Dreesen in a Texans uniform is the most likely outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,685
Rep Power: 46112
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Subscribed Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston. Mediocrity Lives Here!!
Section: Bull Pen!!
Age: 45
Posts: 47,087
Rep Power: 41742
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Kubiak inherited Bruener in 2006. Sure he stuck around for two years under Kubiak but Owen was drafted that same year. Is Dreessen a better blocker than OD? Sure, but that's not why Dreessen sees the field exclusively. This just in, Kubiak likes versatile TE's. OD, Dreessen, James Casey and *ahem* Shannon Sharpe types. I'm not sure about Graham, simply because I haven't seen enough of him, but at the same time I'm sure he fits the same mold.
__________________
DeAndre! |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here is one example of an article talking about Texans liking both a running and a blocking tight end in two TE formation sets with a touch of history to go with it. I'm sure I could dip back to even Kubiak's days with the Broncos to show it further.
http://www.examiner.com/houston-texa...-end-addiction |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,464
Rep Power: 43578
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
With Dreessen interviewing in Bengals, he would still be interviewing for a backup job. The Bengals' TE Jermaine Gresham had a very good year for them.......and they have always run single TE formations.
Since going to the Bengals would: A) not be to enjoy a nonchaotic atmosphere B) not be for a starting position C) not be to be in a high-powered offense Then the only reason he would sign would be for significantly more money........which he may not be offered for a backup position. He has been a very "clutch" player for the Texans. My guess is that the Texans will probably be given the chance to match a Bengals offer. Now whether they can or not............... |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,685
Rep Power: 46112
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I didn't read the article, but I skimmed over it and I didn't see any quotes from the team saying this. Dreesen is a decent blocker and so is OD, but where they help this team the most is with their pass catching. The only big run blocking type of TE that I can remember us drafting was Hill and he's no longer with the team... Casey, OD, and Grahm are all more pass catcher than run blockers, though I wouldn't say they are bad at run blocking... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Kid A
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 414
Rep Power: 7446
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, there was really only one Graham on the field tonight against the Saints, and it wasn't that * cough * kicker, and his name wasn't Jimmy, either.
4 catches for 97 yards. In fact, this TE by the name of Garrett Graham is the Texans' leading pre-season reciever. 7 catches, 141 yards, 20.1 yards average. That's not average. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 2,706
Rep Power: 6036
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Graham was impressive tonight. It's good to finally see him stepping up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,670
Rep Power: 27383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was never worried about Graham in the passing game.
That said, let's see him catch some ball in the regular season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,464
Rep Power: 43578
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 683
Rep Power: 1116
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Joel who?.....I am not worried about that anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dee Eff Dub
Age: 21
Posts: 8,760
Rep Power: 6323
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Oh wait, wrong Graham. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston,Tx
Age: 44
Posts: 1,055
Rep Power: 979
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Graham was fantastic in the passing game tonight.
__________________
3 Weeks 3 Quarterbacks..but the same ****ing team Gary Kubiak December 4,2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
All Pro
|
GGraham was pretty impressive today. He'll probably be like Joel where most defenses doesn't cover him and he'll end up hurting them. This will pretty much be his first season since he hasn't played much the last two year. Watch out for him.
Illegal touching, anyways.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,670
Rep Power: 27383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Our TEs lost out on the block from time to time (including Dreessen) and I know I complaint about OD a few years back as well. Blocking wasn't Graham's forte out of college, but it wasn't a weakness, either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not reaching the ground. It's roots must hold the sky.
Section: 521/Couch
Age: 26
Posts: 7,648
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
He was getting WIDE open last night. Definitely has the hands to replace Dreesen and even rumbled down the field too. Trade off is blocking but I think with reps he'll be a competent blocker.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|