Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


The National Football League League News & Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2011   #1
Wolf
100% Texan
 
Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kerrville
Age: 44
Posts: 37,044
Rep Power: 88913 Wolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respected
Default ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?




Quote:
We're going to go ahead and believe that the shot above is of a part of the greater Jacksonville, Florida, area — after all, the stadium shown does look a lot like EverBank Field, where the Jacksonville Jaguars play. However, this picture may not be truly representative of the current city. According to ESPN's Paul Kuharsky, observant viewers threw multiple flags against the "Worldwide Leader" after it became evident that some of the overhead shots on the "Monday Night Football" game between the Jaguars and San Diego Chargers were outdated representations of Jacksonville.

That's not the best part. According to Kuharsky, one of the aerial shots was actually of Charlotte, North Carolina. Whoops! Kuharshy reached out to an ESPN spokesperson, who had this to say:

"The Charlotte aerial was an inadvertent mistake. It should not have aired. We apologize that it was part of the telecast.

"The scenics of Jacksonville that were used during 'Monday Night Countdown' were shot the night of the previous MNF game there in late October. We did not have a crew shooting scenics Monday. There were no graphic or audio mentions indicating the shot was live, though we understand viewers may have been under this assumption."

Well, sure. Generally speaking, when you see an overhead shot of an area, you expect that you're seeing it live. We're under the impression that you shouldn't have to expect a disclaimer that you're not seeing something from a Goodyear Blimp in 1979, but maybe that's just us.

Or, given the team's new ownership and longstanding rumors of a franchise move to L.A. or elsewhere, maybe ESPN was just trying out aerials of different cities. That would have been a more creative excuse

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shu...rn=nfl-wp13393
Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011   #2
GP 
Go Texans!
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 17,747
Rep Power: 50777 GP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

Good find.

My opinion of the fallout over it? Meh.

It's what's called STOCK FOOTAGE. I wouldn't expect a network to go out and shoot live background footage, especially when it's a nighttime visual like this.

Now, when the footage begins to look aged...yeah, get some new stuff.
__________________
GP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011   #3
bigfan77801
Plebian
 
bigfan77801's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 394
Rep Power: 375 bigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respectedbigfan77801 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

Oopsie
__________________
Right is right, even if everyone is against it and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it--William Penn.
bigfan77801 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011   #4
Showtime100
Got AJ?
 
Showtime100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin,Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 20,321
Rep Power: 110127 Showtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

I can do one better, at least on par with it.

Up until next year I would watch each and every Astros game live or recorded. One game they showed a shot of the Old Court Building downtown, a fairly "Houston" building. I took a screenshot of it and saved it, I thought it was a cool shot. It was clearly "live" and not a pic as evidenced by the ever-so-slow moving clouds behind the building. That was about four years ago.

Last year I see the same shot, four years later. I took another screenshot because it looked too familiar. Sure enough, the cloud formation was identical and I mean identical. I deleted the screenshot because I was a little disgusted by the deception.

No big deal in the grand sceme of things, but still the pretense of it being a live shot is a bit rank.
__________________

Last edited by Showtime100; 12-07-2011 at 10:53 PM.
Showtime100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011   #5
GP 
Go Texans!
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 17,747
Rep Power: 50777 GP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

My opinion is that if the scene is just buildings, or a blimp view of a stadium, etc., then what's the big fuss?

On the other hand, if they show fans arriving to the stadium, and they're all wearing 1980s clothes and hair styles...then it becomes a problem.

It's just filler. We eat filler every day and we know we do, but a stock image or video used as filler is somehow "evil?" I don't get it, I suppose.

My major was Advertising and Public Relations, and I use both of those in my own business that I operate. This sort of thing is not deceptive, it's just something for cynics (and we're ALL cynics, btw) to grab ahold of and say "Ah-hah! I caught you! Sneaky bastards! You can't get one over on me...."

BFD, IMO.
__________________
GP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2011   #6
eriadoc
Texan-American
 
eriadoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 18,030
Rep Power: 207979 eriadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via ICQ to eriadoc Send a message via Yahoo to eriadoc
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

It's presented as live TV. You frequently hear the announcers say something to the effect of you're looking at an overhead shot coming back from break. No mention of it being an overhead shot from a year, three years ago, or whatever. Does it matter? Not really, but it's deceitful, and most people don't like being deceived. There's more than one type of lie. I already don't like ESPN, so one more reason here is all.
__________________
Anyone but Schaub.
eriadoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2011   #7
PsychoLove
Church Of FSM
 
PsychoLove's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 463
Rep Power: 1731 PsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respectedPsychoLove is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

ESPN (The NY, Boston, Miami Sports Network) has been garbage for the last 10 years. Bring back CNN Sports (from the 80's-90's)!
PsychoLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 12-08-2011   #8
Dutchrudder 
COOL BEANS!
 
Dutchrudder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston
Section: Fort Kickass
Age: 29
Posts: 15,063
Rep Power: 150980 Dutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respectedDutchrudder is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

Eh, no harm no foul. No big deal to me.

You know what would be cool? Showing an overhead shot of a stadium from the 70's, then 80's, 90's and show the audience the progression. I think that would be kind of interesting to see if they have footage that goes back that far.
__________________
Life is too important to be taken seriously. -Oscar Wilde
Dutchrudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2011   #9
Showtime100
Got AJ?
 
Showtime100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin,Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 20,321
Rep Power: 110127 Showtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respectedShowtime100 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutchrudder View Post
Eh, no harm no foul. No big deal to me.

You know what would be cool? Showing an overhead shot of a stadium from the 70's, then 80's, 90's and show the audience the progression. I think that would be kind of interesting to see if they have footage that goes back that far.
I agree, bfd, but I LOVE the fact that it's ESPN that got busted doing it....lol.
__________________
Showtime100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2011   #10
GP 
Go Texans!
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 17,747
Rep Power: 50777 GP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: ESPN confuses new Jacksonville with old Jacksonville, and Charlotte?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Showtime100 View Post
I agree, bfd, but I LOVE the fact that it's ESPN that got busted doing it....lol.
I can agree with this!

I wish Fox would find a way to gain some national traction as a sports outlet. I like the concept of the regional Fox stations...but their national presence is nonexistent (except for their website).
__________________
GP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger