![]() |
|
|||||||
| College Football The future stars of the NFL |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,378
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
with the blockbuster trade of pb soon to be official who would improve the Texans the most both in the short & long term? the Texans defensive corners are set, good talent & depth at safety, solid front line when healthly & LB's with some upside and deep. on offense QB and WR have star power. TE is a question mark till BJ plays, line is a mix of young, middle (Wade) and old while the RB position is a combination of late round to underperforming (Hollings) draft picks.
my choice would be Ware @ OLB if not available- 2nd choice Cedric Benson, franchise back 3rd choice trade down & add depth/future picks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 469
Rep Power: 1536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All Pro
|
i dont think there will be a way that we stay at 13 now. i believe their will only be 1% chance that we stay there. ```johnson or merriman are the only 2 i think we would sta there for. We do need to add some picks bc we have lost some. To add more depth
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Lead Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
The Art of War |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 32
Posts: 812
Rep Power: 9
![]() |
I dont understand all this talk about a running back. We have DD, he is one of the most productive backs in the league. I can understand adding depth there especially in the later rounds. I just hope Cass has called the eagles and said our 1st and 4th for your first and and two 2nd rounders. That is one hell of a deal and we come out smellin like roses afterward. We can add tremendous depth and grab likely two superstars.
Last edited by cadahnic; 04-20-2005 at 01:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2271
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
With the Redskins now looking at QB in the draft.. it increases the chances of either Merriman or Williamson falling to us.
my priorities go something like this Benson Merriman or Pollack (I cant say which I like more.. not sure.. both are good) Williamson |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 32
Posts: 812
Rep Power: 9
![]() |
Grid explain the Benson pick to me, and why Merrimen or Pollack. Merrimen is much more athletic and has played in a system similar to ours before so why do you put them so close together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Age: 37
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 11
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2271
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Benson because he is one of the best LBs to come out in a long time. he is of EQUAL value to Brown and Williams IMO. The only question is his motivation.. so if our FO beleives his motivation wont be an issue.. then I could see him being at the top of our list if he falls. He would provide some power running and durability to our running game. We want to be a running team, so that would be a good grab for us.
Merriman and Pollack are so close because .. well.. they are equally talented. Pollack gets a bad rap because he isnt some incredible athletic specimen.. but you cannot deny his abilities. He is the QUICKEST LB in this draft, and quickness can get you to the QB better than speed, IMO. He seems to have exactly the kind of attitude we like, and he plays with ALOT of fire. he has that non-stop motor that Capers is so partial too, and the perfect size to play OLB in the 3-4. Actually the only reason that I rate Merriman on the same level as Pollack is because Merriman is a better athletic specimen.. I think Pollack is the more talented football player. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2271
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If Alex Smith or Aaron Rogers falls to them at #9.. and they consider QB to be a need for them.. I think they would be fools to not SERIOUSLY consider it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,378
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 32
Posts: 812
Rep Power: 9
![]() |
Ok Grid I see were you are going with it, but we have a 1000+ yrd running attack right now. Merrimen is a stud and so is Pollack, but Merriemen is definately better. at least 10 picks and a couple of million better. I have no problem with either of them though, I am glad that you dont want Williamson though since he is best used as trade bait for us. Think about it Carolina and the Eagles both wanting him and knowing that we are willing to trade for more picks. I think the Eagles offers us alot of options. We can take their seconds and first and use it to get back higher into the first to get Pollack, Ware, or Davis or we can add some studs and depth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2271
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would be fine with trading down with the Saints, Bengals, Vikings, or Rams and getting another 2nd or 3rd. Grab Pollack and go from there.
I, actually, would not mind the Williamson pick at all Not anymore anyway. i was totally against it.. but trading for Buchanan has changed everything and we could afford to grab great WR to play opposite of Johnson now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Lead Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
The Art of War |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,378
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2271
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
should change your name to winelover
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|