Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft The future stars of the NFL

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2005   #1
Grid
Hall of Fame
 
Grid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2272 Grid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Traditional WR setup and why we dont need anyone else

So, I do NOT support the drafting of another WR. Fact of the matter is that we are pretty much set at WR and do not need much, if any, more help there. We need help at DL, OL, and LB.

So.. traditionally.. and I use the term lightly.. a more fitting term would be "on average", WRs are set up like this.

#1 the all around talented player. He can run, he can catch, he can jump, he can run precise routes. This is your superstar.

Texans: A.J.

#2 Your possession receiver. This is a guy that isnt necessarily fast, but is physical and athletic. he makes the hard catches and knows how to get open.

Texans: Armstrong (hes a perfect fit)

#3 Your speedster. He doesnt have to be an especially gifted receiver.. he just needs to be the fastest guy on the field and has to catch the ball at least 75% of the time.

Texans: Starling (he fits)



this is how you will see alot of teams set up at WR.. and as you can see we already have the personel to do this. Now, maybe we run a different system.. maybe we want to stretch the field more and go for that big play more often..so we need another "total package" receiver at #2 to do that. But the fact of the matter is that we have all the peices we need to have an effective WR group.

I also realize that I didnt include Gaffney in this comparison. I love gaffney.. but im not so sure he will be effective in a system that uses a setup like this. IMO he is the kind of guy who knows how to exploit a defense that has been stretched thin.. not the kind of guy who will get open and make the catch regardless of what the situation is (like armstrong).

Also.. im not a member of the Texans coaching crew so I have no way of knowing if Armstrong is the kind of player I think he is.. or if Gaffney isnt a better possession receiver.. or if Starling is even ready to take the field in a real game. So, take this for what its worth.


Anyway. I dont see WR being high on our list of needs.. even when Casserly mentioned us going for a WR he said that we MIGHT be interested in grabbing a WR... meaning.. it is not a sure thing or a pressing need. With all of our needs in other places.. and all the positions which we NEED young talent at (our WRs are incredibly young and do not need more youth).. I just dont see us taking a WR unless it is the ABSOLUTE BPA, and the only chance I see of that happening is if Williams or Edwards falls to #13.. and if that happens I think we would be more likely to use it as leverage for a nice trade down.

my
Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2005   #2
D-ReK
RAWWWRR!
 
D-ReK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Avalon
Age: 30
Posts: 3,406
Rep Power: 685 D-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I'm D-ReK, and I approve this message...

I think our WRs are set for next year unless Williams or Edwards falls or we take a speedster in the late rounds to take over for Moses...

Everyone seems to believe that we need a speedy #2 to take pressure off AJ, but I think that as he continues to develop as an all-around receiver, his improved route-running will allow him to get the separation he needs...
__________________
Smoke 'em if you got 'em...
D-ReK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #3
ATX
Hall of Fame
 
ATX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin
Age: 35
Posts: 9,563
Rep Power: 144 ATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

We still need one more reciever. how long wil bradford be here? will he even be here in 2005? what if Gaffney or johnson get injured? are you comfortable with gaffney and armstrong starting? Starling has yet to do anything to be a #3 or #4 WR. We need a #2 WR that is somewhere inbetween AJ and gaffney/Armstrong. I think we'll take a WR in the second round if not the first round.
ATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #4
Texan in Japan
All Pro
 
Texan in Japan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Age: 54
Posts: 527
Rep Power: 8212 Texan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan in Japan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I think if a WR is BPA in any round, we'll look hard at them. However, I tend agree that we have some good talent (add Sloan Thomas to mix), but it really hinges on how coaches feel that Starling and Thomas are progressing...to meet our need for speed.
Texan in Japan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #5
edo783
Site Contributor
 
edo783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, again.
Posts: 7,708
Rep Power: 4641 edo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

IMO, the only reason we should take another WR is if the coaching staff doesn't think any of the guys behind AJ can be a quality #2. I suspect that Starling can be one, but I don't know, they do. If we wind up taking one in the first or second, then that question is answerd. After those rounds, if we take one, we are just looking at a possible up grade for what we have ie. competition.
__________________


De Oppresso Liber
edo783 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #6
Holden135
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 32
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 10 Holden135 is a team player
Default

I also disagree with selecting a wr in the first round this year. I think the second round would be a good time to find another wr. Parish of Miami and Henry of WVU should still be available at this point and i think they would be solid picks. In my opinion solidifying the o-line or the d-line would be much more beneficial for the first round since you can't really expect to find a solid 2nd round lineman unless possibly Bass falls but from all the reports i am hearing it doesnt look like he would fall that far into the 2nd round
Holden135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #7
royce1054
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Age: 32
Posts: 900
Rep Power: 10 royce1054 is ridin' the pine
Send a message via MSN to royce1054 Send a message via Yahoo to royce1054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grid
So,

#2 Your possession receiver. This is a guy that isnt necessarily fast, but is physical and athletic. he makes the hard catches and knows how to get open.

Texans: Armstrong (hes a perfect fit)

#3 Your speedster. He doesnt have to be an especially gifted receiver.. he just needs to be the fastest guy on the field and has to catch the ball at least 75% of the time.

Texans: Starling (he fits)


my
wow hoooooooo.... your #2 is speed burner the one that stretches the field.. goes deep... the one who takes a Safety away from Johnson

a #3 goes over a middle and catches the hard passes. The ones that will hurt if your not careful.... Take a look at the colts.... They are doing right with their WR.
royce1054 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 03-19-2005   #8
gg no re
iggnorent
 
gg no re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 28
Posts: 4,882
Rep Power: 42567 gg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respectedgg no re is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Colts are different setup I believe.... their TEs are their possession receivers while everyone else just burns the corners.
gg no re is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #9
royce1054
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Age: 32
Posts: 900
Rep Power: 10 royce1054 is ridin' the pine
Send a message via MSN to royce1054 Send a message via Yahoo to royce1054
Default

their TE got cut hes now a Lion... Pollard could of been like miller... i do agree we need to throw to out TE more
royce1054 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #10
ThaShark316
#28
 
ThaShark316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rosharon, TX
Age: 29
Posts: 2,408
Rep Power: 34380 ThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to ThaShark316
Default

I'm starting to that even if we paid a great WR cheap money, Grid would blast the FO.


Look, if we don't get another WR in the draft, then we better have JG @ the #2, I can't live with Armstrong @ #2, slot WR...an emphatic YES!

I'm callin my shot now..

Texans will draft Chris Henry in the 2nd rd.
__________________
Resident Gameday Thread Maker. Math enthusiast. Super-villain. Hater of at least 85% of Texan fans.
ThaShark316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #11
royce1054
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Age: 32
Posts: 900
Rep Power: 10 royce1054 is ridin' the pine
Send a message via MSN to royce1054 Send a message via Yahoo to royce1054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaShark316

Texans will draft Chris Henry in the 2nd rd.
Henry has attitude Issues... i am not tottally sure if he matches what texans want to do.
royce1054 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #12
ThaShark316
#28
 
ThaShark316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rosharon, TX
Age: 29
Posts: 2,408
Rep Power: 34380 ThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respectedThaShark316 is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to ThaShark316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royce1054
Henry has attitude Issues... i am not tottally sure if he matches what texans want to do.

Attitude...like thats something the Texans have in the locker...we need a spark...

^^^^^best I could do to shoot down ur point


So what if he has an attitude, that might change in a NFL locker room...
__________________
Resident Gameday Thread Maker. Math enthusiast. Super-villain. Hater of at least 85% of Texan fans.
ThaShark316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #13
royce1054
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Age: 32
Posts: 900
Rep Power: 10 royce1054 is ridin' the pine
Send a message via MSN to royce1054 Send a message via Yahoo to royce1054
Default

Peek can do that by himself. The question is can he channel that onto the field.... and make his play their and not be like a MOSS or some one else who loses his composure. (sp**) If he can do that i have no problem with henry... henry is #8 on my board. I think is going to depend on if Roddy White slips to 2nd or not. If he does then i see us taking a Reggie Brown or Fred Gibson. To do that we would have to not draft williamson and draft Barron or Barnes who is climbing on my board. Barnes is turning out to be a riser. Keep an eye on him.. He played at Washington he has played against some NFL talent.
royce1054 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #14
powda
Hall of Fame
 
powda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,281
Rep Power: 112890 powda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

theres room on this team for a first day pick at wr...with the depth in free agency and the draft itself i think we'll see some good talent at wr slip...

i think williamson will be there at 13 and he may be the bpa on the board when we select...

i think based on cc's bpa tendencies the likelyhood of us selecting a rb,wr, or cb are the highest......theres just more talent and potential for them to be available at the high end of the first round.

and i do think theres a need for a wr on this team...bradford's gone. gaffney will not be a superstar but a role player instead. armstrong may have the best hands on the team ,but dosent have the speed or quickness to be a serious gamebreaker. as for starling....i know he has great tools but im lost as to why so many people in here forecast him as a superior player in the future. his production has been limited exclusivley to preseason.
__________________
Each year, there are more than 40,000 toilet related injuries in the United States.
powda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #15
Xman
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 45
Posts: 335
Rep Power: 10 Xman is ridin' the pine
Default

I think WR is still the way to go.

The arguments about what happened last year (that we didn't go to our #2 guy) are based on decisions the coaches made to utilize the talent they had (or didn't have).
AJ established himself as a stud. Next year, everyone will double cover him (CB close and a safety deep) - especially if he is our only threat at WR. So, we need another threat to lineup on the other side of the field - That will force the defenses to make a decision: either separate the safeties (leaving the middle open - which would open passing and running lanes) or leave single coverage on the other WR (which they can do with impunity now because noone can burn them - change it to a Williams who would abuse single coverage with his size or a burner and the defense has to change).

DD is solid - but he is not a dominant RB that can have success against a defense that puts 8 in the box. Add another good WR (forcing the safeties out of the middle) and his value increases because he could take it to the house when he slips the LBs on the short screen or even a dive.

Simply put, right now our offense does not have enough fire power. Defenses will double AJ and put single coverage on our other WR(or WRs), leaving 8 men in the box to shut down the run. Which leaves us looking at a lot of 3 and outs.
Xman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #16
royce1054
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Age: 32
Posts: 900
Rep Power: 10 royce1054 is ridin' the pine
Send a message via MSN to royce1054 Send a message via Yahoo to royce1054
Default

Your arguement about every one double covering Andre Johnson is actually the reason why we should. Having a #2 to catch the ball when they double Johnson is a great thing. Imagine how life would be to have 2 good WR that can catch and if you double team both you have a Jabar Gaffney or a Billy Miller to catch the ball when you do.
royce1054 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #17
LikeABoss
All Pro
 
LikeABoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The MidWest, Ohio to be exact...
Age: 32
Posts: 599
Rep Power: 0 LikeABoss seems to be losing the respect of his peers
Thumbs up

If the Rams can have Torry Holt and Issac Bruce, the Broncos can have Ashley Lelie and Rod Smith and still have success with their passing game with no egos coming from either player, then the Texans can have Andre Johnson and Troy Williamson on the same team as well

Hell, Oakland just added Randy Moss to team with Jerry Porter
__________________
This is Peyton Manning, can you send a 30 ft long catfish po boy please? - Reggie Bush

Last edited by LikeABoss; 03-19-2005 at 05:22 PM.
LikeABoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #18
Grid
Hall of Fame
 
Grid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2272 Grid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

not saying you cant have two similar WRs starting.. im saying its not necessary.
Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #19
powda
Hall of Fame
 
powda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,281
Rep Power: 112890 powda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respectedpowda is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

i hear ya grid.......and there are ample examples of good teams without superstar recieving cores....but the bottom line is......aside from aj we had no downfield threats last year. either carr has to get much better protection ,AND the running game has to become domminant OR carr needs to have another reciever defenses have to account for.
__________________
Each year, there are more than 40,000 toilet related injuries in the United States.
powda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005   #20
Grid
Hall of Fame
 
Grid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2272 Grid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

well bradford was a down field threat.. just not a good one.

and my problem with getting another receiver is that we WANT better protection and a dominant running game.. that is the direction this team wants to move. Grabbing anothe receiver.. if he is any good, chances are we would either not resign him in a few years cause it would tie up to much money in the offense, or we would sign him and start to look like the Colts.

we want a power running game first and foremost.. so receiver to me just seems like an unnecessary pick. at least in the high rounds. Especially when we already have the peices to put together a good starting WR set.
Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger