![]() |
|
|||||||
| Mock Draft Talk Mock Drafts, group Mocks and links to all the shamockery. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Old Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Willis
Age: 56
Posts: 21,536
Rep Power: 9120
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That is probably true, but I don't know if Cinci would have the same grades. Are they going to go BPA or need?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,357
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Old Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Willis
Age: 56
Posts: 21,536
Rep Power: 9120
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
I'm Score
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 23
Posts: 7,493
Rep Power: 19221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i think the Spliller to Cincy pick makes sense. The offense is anemic, and Spiller can do so much. He can run, h can catch out of the backfield or lined up wide, and he can return kicks. If he is there, I see the Bungles taking him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Draft Guru
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,611
Rep Power: 2602
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yup, that was our thinking too. Spiller represents an additional weapon for Palmer to utilize. The Bengals can line up Benson as HB and put Spiller in the slot and create matchup problems. This is a good spot for him and it represents good value.
__________________
Draft Guru: 91.43% accuracy through first 35 picks from 2006-present I'm Pro Fig Newton, not Cam Newton! -awtysst on 4/28/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Draft Guru
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,611
Rep Power: 2602
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Or that we took Safety Troy Nolan in the 7th rather than Rashad Jennings.
__________________
Draft Guru: 91.43% accuracy through first 35 picks from 2006-present I'm Pro Fig Newton, not Cam Newton! -awtysst on 4/28/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Old Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Willis
Age: 56
Posts: 21,536
Rep Power: 9120
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Because I think they can pick up a RB later, but they really need a TE and S bad and the first round may be the only place they can be sure to get one of the top. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Bring Him Back
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Age: 35
Posts: 7,903
Rep Power: 7242
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Safeties also are considered to have low positional value. Spiller I think is the kind of elite talent that you throw out the value ratings on and just take based on him being a game changer.
__________________
All random posts made entirely of smilies courtesy of kiwitexansfanjr -age 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Old Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Willis
Age: 56
Posts: 21,536
Rep Power: 9120
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
If one of the top 3 safties fell to 21, I think Cinci would be all over it. I think they are really hoping for Mays to be there. They have an affinity for USC guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Draft Guru
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,611
Rep Power: 2602
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
TE and S can be addressed later in the draft. Berry and Thomas will be off the board so you are right that Mays would be available. The problem though is that Mays projects to a SS not a FS and what the Bengals really need is FS. We thought Mays would get exposed way too much in a 4-3 but his flaws would be covered substantially by having that extra MLB playing in front of him. Gresham would be a solid choice, but they could get Gronkowski with their second.
__________________
Draft Guru: 91.43% accuracy through first 35 picks from 2006-present I'm Pro Fig Newton, not Cam Newton! -awtysst on 4/28/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,357
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I wanted Shonn Greene in the 2nd & was mad as hell they passed on him for Connor Barwin. Shonn would have had a major impact for the Texans more so than Barwin (who is developing nicely). The difference we're having is you see Cincinnati back-field as set while I see this as an opportunity to add a prime time playmaker who would fit their open offense, offer depth & development opportunites for the RB corps plus shifting workload off Benson to keep him fresh. Before being picked up Benson was always banged up rushing for 747, 674, 647 & 272 prior four years, not excatly overwhelming. Inactive for Games 10-11 due to a hip flexor strain that sidelined him in first half Nov. 15 at Pittsburgh … Also inactive for Game 16, Jan. 3 at New York Jets (rested for the playoffs) whom they faced & lost to 24-14. The rest served him well as he carried the rushing attack (none of the other backs could produce) for 169 yards, one TD on 21 carries (Shonn Greene had the same number of carries & TD's for 135 yards). When Scott got his chance due to Cedric hip flexor strain weeks 10-11-12 he was very productive in that offense but could not sustain it because of a foot injury (durability concerns). Brian Leonard had a whopping 84 total rushing yards for 2009. mostly used in pass pro & receiver out of the backfield 30 receptions for 217 yds. So I do see this as a serious need & Spiller would be a perfect fit not just for a Carson Palmer offense but for upgrading the overall quality of the position. I would assume that Cushing was bpa on their board. turns out he should of been bpa on teams picking before the Texans too. I had Matthews rated equally with his connections the choice by a nose. Last edited by beerlover; 04-04-2010 at 02:05 PM. Reason: grammer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Old Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Willis
Age: 56
Posts: 21,536
Rep Power: 9120
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have no problem with ya'll putting Spiller there in your mock. I just don't believe that in the real draft they would take him there.
But I also don't believe he would be available there.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,357
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Any
fans here, feel free to chip in, if C.J. Spiller was available #21 would you pass on him?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Old Curmudgeon
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Willis
Age: 56
Posts: 21,536
Rep Power: 9120
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs...b-4eec386089ed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,357
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Draft Guru
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,611
Rep Power: 2602
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would like to point out that the Donovan McNabb trade to DC makes our selection of OT Trent Williams look even more brilliant than it already was!
Go Beerlover and awtysst!
__________________
Draft Guru: 91.43% accuracy through first 35 picks from 2006-present I'm Pro Fig Newton, not Cam Newton! -awtysst on 4/28/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,357
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,357
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
I'm Score
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 23
Posts: 7,493
Rep Power: 19221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | ||
|
Site Contributor
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,357
Rep Power: 15075
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
was thinking our second Texans Mock Draft 2.0 Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|