Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2009   #1
Wolf
100% Texan
 
Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kerrville
Age: 44
Posts: 37,051
Rep Power: 88913 Wolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Coach Gary Kubiak said it shouldn't have made a difference if Alex Smith or Shaun Hill were playing quarterback for the 49ers in the second half of Sunday's 24-21 Texans victory.

Smith came off the bench in the second half and threw three touchdown passes to tight end Vernon Davis down the middle. Some Texans defensive players said they had no idea who Smith was.

“There's no difference; they weren't running any different plays,” Kubiak said. “There's no excuse for that. Whoever's playing quarterback you've got to defend what they're doing. In the second half, we didn't play with the same attention to detail, coverage-wise, leverage-wise.”
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...t/6687664.html

Interesting comment because from what I could tell, 49ers went more of a spread offense and seemed we didn't adjust ...just curious if he is talking strictly to the players or play calling or a little of both
Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #2
drunkcookie
2 drunk 2 cook
 
drunkcookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the waterin' hole...
Posts: 735
Rep Power: 4923 drunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respecteddrunkcookie is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Yah I heard that comment... dunno what to think about it... I dunno who he was talking about, maybe both...

And I don't care if they were running the same plays or not, Alex Smith was more effective IMO, esspecially scrambling...
drunkcookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #3
Texans_Chick
Utopian Dreamer
 
Texans_Chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,232
Rep Power: 64177 Texans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Here's the better link that contains all the quotes regarding the defense (thank goodness for HT.com):

Quote:
(on the defense not having prepared for 49ers QB Alex Smith) "There's no difference—they weren't running any different plays. They were running power-O and throwing deep-overs. No, there is no excuse for that; whoever's playing quarterback you got to go out there and defend what they're doing. I just think in the second half we didn't play with the same attention to detail coverage-wise, leverage-wise. You know, you go out and jump off-sides three times in the first drive of the second half, to me that's focus. So obviously we didn't have the same focus in the second half we had in the first."

(on what happened on 49ers' second touchdown coverage-wise) "I'm trying to think of which one it was. We're in quarters. He's (LB DeMeco Ryans) got to go get some body on that kid—that guy's a heck of a player and as athletic a tight end as there is in the National Football League and if you let him run free, there's not many linebackers going to keep up with him so he's got to go get some body on him there, he's got to get some help from (S Bernard) Pollard there and that's just kind of what I'm talking about, the attention to detail, technique of playing that coverage."

(on if they were playing quarters, would it be the defensive backs fault) "You're a coverage expert now? When you're in quarters, both of them have their responsibilities. (LB) DeMeco (Ryans) has to go over there and get somebody on the guy. You've got to go push him wide; help push him out there to (S) Bernard (Pollard). Bernard has got to squeeze the play some. You're right. It belongs to both of them."

(on the run defense being a source of pride among the defense) "It's been very good for the last month. This back yesterday is a fine player and they had (RB Glen) Coffee also. We played very sound in the run game and I think that's gone with the success of our team here the past few weeks because our defense has stepped up and played so well. We had a lot of ground to make up. Hopefully we can keep going and we'll face another good back this week."
For anyone who watched the presser live, who asked the third question?
__________________
More? Please check out Ultimate Texans Chronicle Blog & Steph Stradley Blog & Twitter @StephStradley
Texans_Chick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #4
jaayteetx
Hall of Fame
 
jaayteetx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Albuquerque,NM
Section: 623
Age: 40
Posts: 3,429
Rep Power: 25091 jaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

my question is, why were we covering Vernon Davis with a LB? Dudes got wheels.
__________________
Oh no! We suck again!
jaayteetx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #5
feebleminded
.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 223
Rep Power: 9068 feebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respectedfeebleminded is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans_Chick View Post
Here's the better link that contains all the quotes regarding the defense (thank goodness for HT.com):



For anyone who watched the presser live, who asked the third question?
McClain
feebleminded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #6
DexmanC
Hall of Fame
 
DexmanC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,826
Rep Power: 34619 DexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaayteetx View Post
my question is, why were we covering Vernon Davis with a LB? Dudes got wheels.
It's the same reason OD was open all day. They are TIGHT ENDS.
When a team puts 3 wide receivers on the field, you're gonna put
3 cornerbacks on them. That leaves linebackers to cover tight ends.
Yeah, it sucks. But Houston burns teams every week with the same
mismatch.
DexmanC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #7
jaayteetx
Hall of Fame
 
jaayteetx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Albuquerque,NM
Section: 623
Age: 40
Posts: 3,429
Rep Power: 25091 jaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respectedjaayteetx is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DexmanC View Post
It's the same reason OD was open all day. They are TIGHT ENDS.
When a team puts 3 wide receivers on the field, you're gonna put
3 cornerbacks on them. That leaves linebackers to cover tight ends.
Yeah, it sucks. But Houston burns teams every week with the same
mismatch.
actually, i think SF had some dbs covering OD for part of the game, i believe
__________________
Oh no! We suck again!
jaayteetx is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 10-27-2009   #8
DexmanC
Hall of Fame
 
DexmanC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,826
Rep Power: 34619 DexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaayteetx View Post
actually, i think SF had some dbs covering OD for part of the game, i believe
Which in my response I specifically stated the 3-wide, 1 TE set the
9'ers went to in the second half. You're referring to the Texans
in the 3 TE set. Of course they can use corners on the TE and get
away with it, as there is only 1 WR on the field.
DexmanC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #9
buddyboy
All Pro
 
buddyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 834
Rep Power: 14907 buddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbuddyboy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans_Chick View Post
Here's the better link that contains all the quotes regarding the defense (thank goodness for HT.com):



For anyone who watched the presser live, who asked the third question?
Wow. Seems like Gary didn't wake up on the right side of the bed before that presser.



Ouch McClain. Ouch.
buddyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #10
DexmanC
Hall of Fame
 
DexmanC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,826
Rep Power: 34619 DexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyboy View Post
Wow. Seems like Gary didn't wake up on the right side of the bed before that presser.



Ouch McClain. Ouch.
You can still see the video on the main page. He was just seizing an
opportunity to poke fun at John Mcclain. Who wouldn't?
DexmanC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #11
DerekLee1
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,295
Rep Power: 1687 DerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans_Chick View Post
Here's the better link that contains all the quotes regarding the defense (thank goodness for HT.com)
He actually called out a couple of players. That's new for him.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by NitroGSXR View Post
My son and I toss the old pigskin around pretty much everyday. He says I throw like a girl and when he drops it, I tell him he catches like Jacoby Jones. He does not find it as funny as I do.
DerekLee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #12
Lucky
Moderator
 
Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 12,992
Rep Power: 120321 Lucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaayteetx View Post
my question is, why were we covering Vernon Davis with a LB? Dudes got wheels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DexmanC View Post
It's the same reason OD was open all day. They are TIGHT ENDS.
When a team puts 3 wide receivers on the field, you're gonna put
3 cornerbacks on them. That leaves linebackers to cover tight ends.
Yeah, it sucks. But Houston burns teams every week with the same
mismatch.
Daniels torched All Pro Patrick Willis. Ryans and Willis are premier LBs. But, they can't handle TEs like Davis and Daniels in pass coverage. Complete mismatches and poor defensive play calling that put these LBs in these coverages.
__________________
“We’re looking for a coach that...works with great energy and enthusiasm and very positive in his approach.” - Bob McNair
Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #13
beerlover
Site Contributor
 
beerlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 12,306
Rep Power: 47761 beerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky View Post
Daniels torched All Pro Patrick Willis. Ryans and Willis are premier LBs. But, they can't handle TEs like Davis and Daniels in pass coverage. Complete mismatches and poor defensive play calling that put these LBs in these coverages.
this is an excellent reason to draft a premier coverage LB who has the speed, length & range to cover elite TE's, complimenting what we already have (SAM/MLB).
beerlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #14
DexmanC
Hall of Fame
 
DexmanC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,826
Rep Power: 34619 DexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerlover View Post
this is an excellent reason to draft a premier coverage LB who has the speed, length & range to cover elite TE's, complimenting what we already have (SAM/MLB).
Hmmm.. Subtle way of saying Zac Diles sucks, and replacing him
needs to be a top priority next offseason?
DexmanC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #15
disaacks3
Site Contributor
 
disaacks3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Section: 116 - Row M
Age: 45
Posts: 10,295
Rep Power: 106068 disaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky View Post
Daniels torched All Pro Patrick Willis. Ryans and Willis are premier LBs. But, they can't handle TEs like Davis and Daniels in pass coverage. Complete mismatches and poor defensive play calling that put these LBs in these coverages.
QFT! Singletary has got Davis re-invented and OD is a pass-receiving machine - asking any LB to cover them all day is gonna get you burned more than once.
__________________
D.B. - That sounds like a nugget of reality wrapped in a layer of embellished hyperbole.
disaacks3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009   #16
beerlover
Site Contributor
 
beerlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 12,306
Rep Power: 47761 beerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by DexmanC View Post
Hmmm.. Subtle way of saying Zac Diles sucks, and replacing him
needs to be a top priority next offseason?
Not saying Zach Diles sucks, he provides excellent depth & can play all three postions. However to perfectly fit position he cannot drag in downfield coverage, face it he's not fast enough (4.65) to match-up with other teams weapons. Besides speed he is also rather short (maybe 6-2) to alter passing lanes, tip balls & create bigger zone coverage. Excellent value with 7th rd. pick & to upgrade position would require a big jump in talent, since he possess so many intangibles. To get a player like that the Texans probably need to target the best in the draft, another 1st probably not but maybe a 2nd. this would complete an absolute steller LB group with depth.
beerlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009   #17
Vinny
shiny happy fan
 
Vinny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 50
Posts: 21,670
Rep Power: 133798 Vinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by disaacks3 View Post
QFT! Singletary has got Davis re-invented and OD is a pass-receiving machine - asking any LB to cover them all day is gonna get you burned more than once.
I know the 9ers covered Daniels with Clements when AJ went down. That says quite a bit about OD.
__________________
http://twitter.com/#!/TexansTalk


"A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves" - Edward R. Murrow
Vinny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009   #18
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 46
Posts: 44,595
Rep Power: 276022 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by disaacks3 View Post
QFT! Singletary has got Davis re-invented and OD is a pass-receiving machine - asking any LB to cover them all day is gonna get you burned more than once.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny View Post
I know the 9ers covered Daniels with Clements when AJ went down. That says quite a bit about OD.
I can't believe each week when I see teams still try to cover OD with a LB. Like Lucky said, top tier LB's like Ryans and Willis are not going to consistently cover OD. Schaub has to be walking to the line just chuckling to himself.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009   #19
BigBull17
Hall of Fame
 
BigBull17's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Alvin
Age: 33
Posts: 5,036
Rep Power: 5496 BigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respectedBigBull17 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans_Chick View Post
Here's the better link that contains all the quotes regarding the defense (thank goodness for HT.com):



For anyone who watched the presser live, who asked the third question?
That was very funny when he told that weezing wind bag that. Made me crack up.
__________________
Ugh, I wish my dog would quit Schaubin in the living room...
BigBull17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009   #20
76Texan
Hall of Fame
 
76Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,459
Rep Power: 78237 76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Kubiak:No excuses for defense

As I counted the numbers of plays by the Niners, the results are as followed:

In the first half, they went:
- No-back once
- Single-back 12 times
- Two-back 8 times (mostly toward the end of the half)
- One direct snap

In the second half, they went:
- No-back 4 times
- Single-back 17 times (6 straight times on their last drive - no point)
- Two-back 9 times
- One direct snap

We were rarely in our nickel in either half.
Instead we mostly stayed in the base 4-3 the whole game.

So overall, they did went with the spread slightly a little more, but it was insignificant.

The D simply did not play well in the second half (all 3 units).

Definitely, it was a little more of a prevent defense in the second half.
76Texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger