Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft The future stars of the NFL

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2009   #1
Goldensilence
hipster elite
 
Goldensilence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin
Age: 32
Posts: 5,143
Rep Power: 13669 Goldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Why not a LB @ 15?

There are people on the board who think that given the entire scope of team needs,that we are not sure we are able to trade back again,and it is unlikely a top tier guy falls to 15 that we see best value for that slot being a linebacker. Now some are in disagreement over whether that is Matthews, Laurenitis, or Cushing but all feel it is a unit that can be upgraded and we'll see the earliest likely return on their play.

The point of this thread is simple if not one of those guys, then who at 15 presents the best value for our team? Make a good argument for your player.This is strictly 1st round value.

My arugment is for James Laurentitis. Cushing has lots of questions surrounding him and I'm not sure he'll bring the intensity I want to see out of my LB corps. I like Matthews and his bloodline but not a lot to judge for a one year body of work. I like Laurenitis' body of work and the kid likes to hit.

I do not see the value of going RB in the first while guys like Shonn Greene, and McCoy are likely to be available. I do see the need to not only get a guy behind Slaton but someone who can reliably split the load and more if needed.

I like the idea of getting Mack and we do need to upgrade over Myers but value is not there at 15. I like Duke Robinson as well but again not value there at 15. Unless we tag one of the T for a move to Guard don't see the value in taking a tackle here.

Pettigrew would be a luxury pick. Maclin would be interesting but again IMO luxury pick. Leach at FB enough said.

I'm expecting that Kollar will be able to get better production out of our current DT's with up dropping the read and react schtik from Smith. Jerry will likely get a look here. Another unit that could use an upgrade but I don't see the value here. I would like to see us add a pass rush specialist at DE but not at 15. Johnson would be an intriguing pick but with Smith signed it just doesn't seem likely.

Not many William Moore fans out there right now with Wilson in the fold doesn't seem like the pick they'll make. I am however a little nervous about another one year wonder ala Will Demps. Staff seems high on Barber @ SS but I think we could upgrade the spot. No SS worthy @ 15.

I would love to see Jenkins fall to us at 15 but doubt he makes it past N.O. who could use a big time CB. Other then that maybe Butler's stock rises like DRC or Dunta's come draft time. Unless we have no intentions of resigning Dunta I don't like the idea of a CB here.

Finally LB. Demeco is well...Demeco. I think if Adibi puts on a few pounds and works on his flexibility he could be a good starter. Injured his rookie year but didn't have issues in college. I like our depth at LB but the problem that others and I run into is Zac Diles. His injury is a concern to whether he'll be back on time but my concern is his lack of sideline to sideline speed. When Diles and Greenwood went down and Bentley and Adibi were inserted into the line up this defense got visibly better IMO. That and while not starting he makes good depth at LB.

Alright guys fire away.
Goldensilence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #2
RipTraxx
Free Agent
 
RipTraxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kingwood
Age: 32
Posts: 595
Rep Power: 40 RipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to RipTraxx
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

With three of the top defensive players coming out of USC. All three being linebackers. Im gonna wait till their pro day. (april 1)

I DO like the idea of a LB so long as he can provide a rush and/or put is hand down as a DE.

as of RIGHT NOW...im going with Matthews.
__________________
"What is that Chamomile tea??? You wanna take a nap?????" ~JJ Watt~
RipTraxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #3
TimeKiller
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not reaching the ground. It's roots must hold the sky.
Section: 521/Couch
Age: 28
Posts: 7,648
Rep Power: 0 TimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respectedTimeKiller is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

I'd be fine with Laraunitis at 15, being a guy who has been bangin a drum or two for Matthews for a couple weeks...
TimeKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #4
RipTraxx
Free Agent
 
RipTraxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kingwood
Age: 32
Posts: 595
Rep Power: 40 RipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respectedRipTraxx is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to RipTraxx
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeKiller View Post
I'd be fine with Laraunitis at 15, being a guy who has been bangin a drum or two for Matthews for a couple weeks...
With that 4.85 in kinda makes me wonder if hes just a product of the system type.
__________________
"What is that Chamomile tea??? You wanna take a nap?????" ~JJ Watt~
RipTraxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #5
Goldensilence
hipster elite
 
Goldensilence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin
Age: 32
Posts: 5,143
Rep Power: 13669 Goldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RipTraxx View Post
With that 4.85 in kinda makes me wonder if hes just a product of the system type.
I've seen it at 4.80

http://www.draftcountdown.com/scouti...aurinaitis.php

Might be a product type player but I'll agree the more I look at Matthews he has more upside but problem I still go back to is neither him or Cushing has the work of Body that Laurinaitis has compiled.

Last edited by Goldensilence; 03-16-2009 at 01:41 PM.
Goldensilence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #6
Texecutioner
Hall of Fame
 
Texecutioner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,467
Rep Power: 94174 Texecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldensilence View Post
I've seen it at 4.80

http://www.draftcountdown.com/scouti...aurinaitis.php

Might be a product type but I'll agree the more I look at Matthews has more upside but problem I still go back to is neither him or Cushing has the work of Body that Laurinaitis has compiled.
I'd have no problem with Lauranitus. On another site, someone actually compared him to Demeco as far as being an under the radar kind of guy in this draft as far as the ELITE LB's sort of how Demeco was and said that Lauranitus could easily be a very good player for a franchise for many many years and I really agree with that. He is a hard worker and a true football player that loves to hit. I don't see how he would be bad for any team that could use a LB right now. People forget that last draft he would have been easily a top 10 pick as well.

I'd have no problem with Lauranitus personally.
Texecutioner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #7
TexansSeminole
Hall of Fame
 
TexansSeminole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Age: 27
Posts: 8,513
Rep Power: 66299 TexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansSeminole is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texecutioner View Post
I'd have no problem with Lauranitus. On another site, someone actually compared him to Demeco as far as being an under the radar kind of guy in this draft as far as the ELITE LB's sort of how Demeco was and said that Lauranitus could easily be a very good player for a franchise for many many years and I really agree with that. He is a hard worker and a true football player that loves to hit. I don't see how he would be bad for any team that could use a LB right now. People forget that last draft he would have been easily a top 10 pick as well.

I'd have no problem with Lauranitus personally.
The problem with Lauranitius on the Texans is where do you put him. I'd like him as a MLB but from what I understand DeMeco is not going to be moving from the middle. Could he play SLB? Don't know if he is worth the 15 at SLB.
TexansSeminole is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 03-16-2009   #8
Ole Miss Texan
Hall of Fame
 
Ole Miss Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,680
Rep Power: 24791 Ole Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respectedOle Miss Texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Laurinaitis... He's not a guy I would move Demeco outside for so that means JL would be an outside LB for us. He's probably best suited for WLB. I'd rather get an upgrade at SLB and let Adibi develop into our WLB.

I'd taking Cushing and Matthews over Laurinaitis who should probably go to a 3-4 team anyways.
__________________
#99 JJ Watt - Dream Big Work Hard
Ole Miss Texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #9
Polo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

I don't go by value so I don't really look at who's rated to go where.

If they pass up players that are more highly rated and decide to "reach" for a DB like they "reached" for Duane Brown and Mario Williams, I'd be cool with that...I'm hoping we go DB but I would not be upset at all with any of the LB's listed...
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #10
jdog
All Pro
 
jdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 838
Rep Power: 16 jdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden cover
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Trade down for Sean Smith. We need secondary help more than anything except maybe defensive tackle, but I am sick of taking DT's in the first round. Smith is the best safety in the draft and should go late in the first round. Why not trade down, get more picks, and the best player in the draft for our greatest need? With the extra pick(s) from trading down, we can get a big DT or other defensive depth or some depth for the offensive line or a power runner.
jdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #11
Goldensilence
hipster elite
 
Goldensilence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin
Age: 32
Posts: 5,143
Rep Power: 13669 Goldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ole Miss Texan View Post
Laurinaitis... He's not a guy I would move Demeco outside for so that means JL would be an outside LB for us. He's probably best suited for WLB. I'd rather get an upgrade at SLB and let Adibi develop into our WLB.

I'd taking Cushing and Matthews over Laurinaitis who should probably go to a 3-4 team anyways.
Personally I think he's like Demeco in the sense of line him up where he's needed. When we drafted Demeco we didn't expect him to be the mike to begin with but after Cowart go injured and he excelled rest is history.

Problem I keep coming up with is at 15 barring a trade down who else can you make a serious case for?

Question if Oher falls to us at 15 and we don't get a good trade back offer do you take him and move him or anyone else on the line inside?
Goldensilence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #12
Goldensilence
hipster elite
 
Goldensilence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin
Age: 32
Posts: 5,143
Rep Power: 13669 Goldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog View Post
Trade down for Sean Smith. We need secondary help more than anything except maybe defensive tackle, but I am sick of taking DT's in the first round. Smith is the best safety in the draft and should go late in the first round. Why not trade down, get more picks, and the best player in the draft for our greatest need? With the extra pick(s) from trading down, we can get a big DT or other defensive depth or some depth for the offensive line or a power runner.
This thread is not about trading down. It's about who can you justify taking a 15 considering team needs and value. That's all I am interested in after 10 pages of the Linebacker thread. If not taking one of those three linebackers at 15 who do you take?
Goldensilence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #13
jdog
All Pro
 
jdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 838
Rep Power: 16 jdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden cover
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldensilence View Post
This thread is not about trading down. It's about who can you justify taking a 15 considering team needs and value. That's all I am interested in after 10 pages of the Linebacker thread. If not taking one of those three linebackers at 15 who do you take?
Okay, if any of the following people are available at 15, I say we draft them instead of Brian Cushing and any other LB would be a reach in my opinion:

Knowshon Moreno RB
Mark Sanchez QB
Chris Wells RB
Michael Oher OT
Vontae Davis CB
Malcolm Jenkins S
Rey Maualuga LB

With Adibi, Bentley, Diles, and Ryans, I don't know how you can say that LB is any greater of a need than RB, QB, OT, or CB, and the value for the LB's available at 15 isn't any greater than these other positions.

Last edited by jdog; 03-16-2009 at 06:20 PM. Reason: Changed Jenkins from CB to S.
jdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009   #14
Goldensilence
hipster elite
 
Goldensilence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin
Age: 32
Posts: 5,143
Rep Power: 13669 Goldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respectedGoldensilence is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog View Post
Okay, if any of the following people are available at 15, I say we draft them instead of Brian Cushing and any other LB would be a reach in my opinion:

Knowshon Moreno RB
Mark Sanchez QB
Chris Wells RB
Michael Oher OT
Vontae Davis CB
Malcolm Jenkins S
Rey Maualuga LB

With Adibi, Bentley, Diles, and Ryans, I don't know how you can say that LB is any greater of a need than RB, QB, OT, or CB, and the value for the LB's available at 15 isn't any greater than these other positions.
Sanchez is a viable pick because? Starting QB and a signed basckup.

Wells and Moreno will be there likely but again I think we can find better value in the second or third round.

Jenkins is not a lock to be moved to safety. Even then i'm not convinced he gets past N.O. who needs a play maker at CB. Davis will be there but he's inconsistent.

I doubt Rey gets past Denver unless Cutler does get traded, and Stafford falls to them. IF Rey does fall it's a no brainer.

IF Oher does fall to us at 15 where do you play him? RT? LT? Move him inside? Move one of those 2 inside?
Goldensilence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009   #15
jdog
All Pro
 
jdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 838
Rep Power: 16 jdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden cover
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldensilence View Post
Sanchez is a viable pick because? Starting QB and a signed basckup.
Sanchez is a franchise qb that probably needs a year or so on the sideline. Let Schaub play this year and prove he is the guy. I'm not sold as of yet. He has yet to play a full season. Our backup is the backup from an 0-16 team. I'm sure he will workout as a backup, but I don't think he is the future either. Sanchez, learning from Kubiak, would be the future franchise qb. I don't think our qb situation is a done deal, and the first round is for these kinds of guys in my opinion.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldensilence View Post
Wells and Moreno will be there likely but again I think we can find better value in the second or third round.
You might be right, but you can make the same argument for linebackers. We've had success with picking linebackers in later rounds. As far as Wells and Moreno, they are game changing backs. Wells is an ideal power back, and we can't make Slaton a work horse between the tackles kind of guy and expect him to last. He'll be DD in a couple of years. Plus, we have that red zone problem which a guy like Wells could solve for us. Moreno is supposed to be a complete back, and it wouldn't hurt to have two great backs. We can agree that RB is a valuable position and we're one injury away from being in a terrible position of need there. As far as linebackers, which guy at 15 is going to be a game changer and make us win more games that we can't find in round 2 or 3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldensilence View Post
Jenkins is not a lock to be moved to safety. Even then i'm not convinced he gets past N.O. who needs a play maker at CB. Davis will be there but he's inconsistent.
I think secondary is our greatest need. It's possible that Jenkins could fall to us, so you admit that we should take him? Also, Davis might be inconsistent, but he would be an upgrade at CB for us. Which linebacker at 15 would have a perfect game? None.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldensilence View Post
I doubt Rey gets past Denver unless Cutler does get traded, and Stafford falls to them. IF Rey does fall it's a no brainer.
Yeah, and this doesn't counter your suggestion of linebacker so forget this one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldensilence View Post
IF Oher does fall to us at 15 where do you play him? RT? LT? Move him inside? Move one of those 2 inside?
I'd leave this up to Alex Gibbs. It's a good problem to have. If Adibi and Diles are healthy, where do you put our new linebacker? He's going to compete for a starting spot. I'm just being a devil's advocate to your question of who to pick other than a linebacker.
jdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009   #16
Polo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

If we get a linebacker they need to be exteremely good IMO...They need to have playmaking ability...

I don't see them trying to replace Adibi, and it makes no sense to replace Dile with Laurinitis IMO...Honestly, I'd rather have Bentley come in and play SLB over Laurinitis.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009   #17
badboy
Site Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Clear Lake
Posts: 23,067
Rep Power: 143539 badboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

If Jenkins falls and he might, he's my guy. Could possibly be a starter at FS or CB before season out. Some forget he was #1 DB last season before returning to school and # 1 CB prior to a "slow" time @ combine. I realy hope we do not end up @ 15 without Raji or Jenkins available. My only other pick would be CB Vontae Davis. There would be a place for him and lots of upside. If Wells is selected, I will not moan but think it will be risky
__________________
I want to be able to recognize the difference between a "want" and a "need" and then I want to be satisfied with getting a need
badboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009   #18
threetoedpete
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Age: 58
Posts: 6,644
Rep Power: 142 threetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Ok hot shot.....
Quote:
Sanchez is a franchise qb that probably needs a year or so on the sideline. Let Schaub play this year and prove he is the guy. I'm not sold as of yet. He has yet to play a full season. Our backup is the backup from an 0-16 team. I'm sure he will workout as a backup, but I don't think he is the future either. Sanchez, learning from Kubiak, would be the future franchise qb. I don't think our qb situation is a done deal, and the first round is for these kinds of guys in my opinion.
List for us all the Jr QBs who came out with only sixteen games under there belts and led there teams into the playoffs after being drafted in the first round ? Sanchez will get drafted high becuase there is a hole at the position because there were so many....with more up side ....who decided to return to school. Don't confsue a supply and demand need with talent. If the others come out both Mathews and Sanchez are end of the first round second day guys. And any team taking either one in '09 is rolling the dice with them big time.
__________________
"Everybody understands that the only way we're going to do it is by extremely hard work."

Last edited by threetoedpete; 03-17-2009 at 11:35 PM.
threetoedpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009   #19
threetoedpete
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Age: 58
Posts: 6,644
Rep Power: 142 threetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

If Raji Falls or Jerry is there...they'll think about it. Jenkins does nothing for this club in '09. Under your scenario....I move back and Take Barwin.

And just who are all of these later round LB gems we've found outside of dilles ? adibi by my definition is a mid round pick. Look they just signed Antonio. They aren't moving Mario. The only way you get a front line guy who can come in and make the Back seven quicker..and the front seven beter...is taking a highly athletic guy at the OLB. You may not like that. They may not do that....but that seems to fit what they say the are going to do in '09.
__________________
"Everybody understands that the only way we're going to do it is by extremely hard work."
threetoedpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009   #20
jdog
All Pro
 
jdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 838
Rep Power: 16 jdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden cover
Default Re: Why not a LB @ 15?

Quote:
Originally Posted by threetoedpete View Post
Ok hot shot.....


List for us all the Jr QBs who came out with only sixteen games under there belts and led there teams into the playoffs after being drafted in the first round ? Sanchez will get drafted high becuase there is a whole at the position because there were so many....with more up side ....who decided to return to school. Don't confsue a supply and demand need with talent. If the others come out both Mathews and Sanchez are end of the first round second day guys. And any team taking either one in '09 is rolling the dice with them big time.
That's a pretty specific criteria for comparison. Do these examples all need to be named Bob too?

I already said that he will probably need a year on the sideline. I admit he is similar to Matthews in that he is more talent than experience, but many people are suggesting we take Matthews. I'm asking why not Sanchez in response to Goldensilence's thread on why not take a LB at 15. Also, any player drafted in the first round ends up having to deal with a lot of pressure, and is also going to have a lot of risk associated with them.

I don't think I'm confusing supply and demand with talent either. The only knock against Sanchez that I know of is that he only started for one year, but look at what he accomplished in that year. If those guys that you refer to were in this draft, yeah, it would lower Stafford and Sanchez, but only because it would be one heck of a great draft for quarterbacks.

I don't think there's an OLB for us that isn't more of a late 1st round or early second round guy that we would be reaching to get at 15. If Matthews is someone that we really think will become a dominant, game changing force on our defense, then I am all for drafting him. I would prefer to draft a defensive player in the first round, but I think at 15 it's a reach. That's why I initially suggested trading down.

Keep in mind the point of this thread. So, you're saying that OLB is the best value for our team at 15? We're not talking about what the Texans WILL do because we really don't know and that kind of ruins the point of the thread. If we were talking about what will the Texans do, I'd say trade down and draft an OLB or DB.
jdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger