Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


The National Football League League News & Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-01-2008   #1
Texans_Chick
Utopian Dreamer
 
Texans_Chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,246
Rep Power: 74671 Texans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respected
Default On Roger Goodell

I thought y'all would be interested in this:

Is Roger Goodell an Unthinking Moralist?

I think that there are a lot of players and fans that are less than impressed with his tenure as commish. I don't think this is something that is said much by the mainstream media because they don't want to make the NFL angry.

But it is strange. Very rarely do I ever write something semi-controversial that the commenters are all saying, yeah, thanks for saying that. I think it touches a nerve.
__________________
More? Please check out Ultimate Texans Chronicle Blog & Steph Stradley Blog & Twitter @StephStradley
Texans_Chick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #2
Polo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

I didn't realize the Bears got the 49ers pick...

That is the dumbest thing I ever heard of...

And thats a good read...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #3
Specnatz
Site Contributor
 
Specnatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,620
Rep Power: 3240 Specnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

I have heard this brought up before but not into such detail. There was a player who was suspended from the Bengals and at first Goodell denied him reinstatement then relented. Some were saying Goodell was being to heavy handed with the reinstatement. it was a player who was suspended prior to Goodell taking office.

I have to say I will need to read more, going through the links you provided. This could turn into a huge debate and battle in the NFL and here as well. I know have not voiced my opinion yet but I need to read more, first.
__________________
The Invisible Poster!
Cynic at work, do not mind me; move along nothing to see here!
Specnatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #4
Polo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

From the article:

Quote:
Whether or not Roger Goodell is guided by an inflated sense of morality is frankly secondary to the fact that , whatever is guiding him, it isn't consistent. For all anyone can tell, he's just making stuff up as he goes along.
That's what it seems like to me...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #5
brakos82
Hall of Fame
 
brakos82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: LOHAR (Land of Hipsters and Rain)
Section: 1009 E. Union
Posts: 19,728
Rep Power: 52901 brakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respectedbrakos82 is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to brakos82
Default Re: On Roger Goodell



brakos82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #6
Fox
All Pro
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 753
Rep Power: 414 Fox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Good read and for the most part I agree. Goodell seems to have the final say in all matters, he doesn't seem to have a uniform approach to them, and he's using his influence often. When you throw down these massive punishments, and do so arbitrarily with no explicit guidelines it just asks for people to question your decisions and get in a hissy. Just look at David Stern and the NBA. His decision to sit Amare Stoudamire of the Suns last year simply for standing too far from the bench quite possibly changed the course of the playoffs. That's bad for business when your league's games are decided by the old guys in offices and not the guys playing the game.

On the other hand, Pac Man is friggin ridiculous. I think he deserves the punishment he's received. And as for the 49er's, serves em right that they lost their pick. Just because a. everyone does it, and b. they didn't get the player doesn't mean they shouldn't be punished after being caught for something that is against the league's rules. It doesn't make sense to only punish someone for successfully cheating, ie. tampering and signing the player.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #7
Lucky
Moderator
 
Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13,084
Rep Power: 145631 Lucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Roger Goodell doesn't operate in a vacuum. He's hired by the 32 NFL owners to a job. And that job description is basically to keep the brand name "National Football League" in good repute.

I don't think morality has anything to do with Goodell's actions. Pacman Jones and Bill Belichick's actions were counter productive to the long-term interests of the NFL. Goodell came down hard because he had the backing of the owners. Of course the players don't like it. At least not the ones who play fast and loose with the rules or the law. But what are they going to do? Quit and become professional dancers? If they wish to continue playing football and making millions, they need to realize they have a vested interest in the the business that is the NFL. Else, get pulled like a bad tooth. And Roger Goodell is cold blooded dentist who doesn't use Novocaine.
__________________
“We’re looking for a coach that...works with great energy and enthusiasm and very positive in his approach.” - Bob McNair
Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 04-01-2008   #8
Texans_Chick
Utopian Dreamer
 
Texans_Chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,246
Rep Power: 74671 Texans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky View Post
Roger Goodell doesn't operate in a vacuum. He's hired by the 32 NFL owners to a job. And that job description is basically to keep the brand name "National Football League" in good repute.

I don't think morality has anything to do with Goodell's actions. Pacman Jones and Bill Belichick's actions were counter productive to the long-term interests of the NFL. Goodell came down hard because he had the backing of the owners. Of course the players don't like it. At least not the ones who play fast and loose with the rules or the law. But what are they going to do? Quit and become professional dancers? If they wish to continue playing football and making millions, they need to realize they have a vested interest in the the business that is the NFL. Else, get pulled like a bad tooth. And Roger Goodell is cold blooded dentist who doesn't use Novocaine.
I agree that he is supposed to maintain the name in good standing.

The problem, as I see it, is making league punishment all about Roger.

I think there are other ways he could have handled the punishment without increasing the attention to the badness.Leagues have done it for years.

Creating uncertainty and debate over league discipline is not healthy and is horrible for planning and can possibly be franchise killing.

The PacMan rule is an illustration of how hard cases make bad law. Once you make up stuff to throw the book at PacMan and the Patriots, you have set a standard that you might feel uncomfortable with for other situations.

You might not be concerned with it now, but maybe more when Goodell does something that screws over your favorite team and/or creates uncertainty and looks like a rip (flipping 49ers pick with the Chicago huh?).

The drug policy is good. You violate it, you generally know what happens if everybody followed procedures. You might love it or hate it but you know what will happen.

"Whatever Rog Feels" is the sort of standard that can make people feel like he might be biased for or against their team even if he doesn't intend to.
__________________
More? Please check out Ultimate Texans Chronicle Blog & Steph Stradley Blog & Twitter @StephStradley
Texans_Chick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #9
Trap_Star
SiteContributor
 
Trap_Star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: xvideo
Age: 29
Posts: 4,737
Rep Power: 35494 Trap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respectedTrap_Star is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

im curious to see if he re-instates PacMan before he does Odell Thurman.
Trap_Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #10
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 45,404
Rep Power: 304671 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans_Chick View Post
I agree that he is supposed to maintain the name in good standing.

The problem, as I see it, is making league punishment all about Roger.
So if the league set up a commission of three owners or whatever, you think it would appear or in fact be any less arbitrary or have substantially different results?

Quote:
I think there are other ways he could have handled the punishment without increasing the attention to the badness.Leagues have done it for years.
How?

Quote:
Creating uncertainty and debate over league discipline is not healthy and is horrible for planning and can possibly be franchise killing.

The PacMan rule is an illustration of how hard cases make bad law. Once you make up stuff to throw the book at PacMan and the Patriots, you have set a standard that you might feel uncomfortable with for other situations.
Bad facts can make bad law, but disparate facts can make disparate results which are totally justified and yet appear arbitrary.

Quote:
"Whatever Rog Feels" is the sort of standard that can make people feel like he might be biased for or against their team even if he doesn't intend to.
How can you possibly write a rule for the NFL which basically encompasses all human indiscretion and criminal conduct and reduce it to a predictable standard? I get the concern, but don't see how it translates into a solution without more.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #11
hollywood_texan
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 3,021
Rep Power: 1649 hollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox View Post
When you throw down these massive punishments, and do so arbitrarily with no explicit guidelines it just asks for people to question your decisions and get in a hissy. Just look at David Stern and the NBA. His decision to sit Amare Stoudamire of the Suns last year simply for standing too far from the bench quite possibly changed the course of the playoffs. That's bad for business when your league's games are decided by the old guys in offices and not the guys playing the game.
There is a very clear rule in the NBA that if you leave the bench during an altercation, it's an automatic suspension.

The Stoudamire suspension was not an arbitrary ruling by Stern.

It's a very specific rule that came about due to the Palace Brawl a few years back.

Bad example to use.




On the Goodell subject, I haven't really kept up with it that much to really form an opinion. But, he does seem a little off.

Also, I don't understand the hair thing. But, I am a little biased since I have long hair myself.

Last edited by hollywood_texan; 04-01-2008 at 08:18 PM.
hollywood_texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #12
Fox
All Pro
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 753
Rep Power: 414 Fox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywood_texan View Post
There is a very clear rule in the NBA that if you leave the bench during an altercation, it's an automatic suspension.

The Stoudamire suspension was not an arbitrary ruling by Stern.

It's a very specific rule that came about due to the Palace Brawl a few years back.

Bad example to use.
Yea, after looking back at it you're right, not a good example. Probably should've gone with him making them wear suits to the game or changing the ball or something of that nature.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #13
ATXtexanfan
Site Contributor
 
ATXtexanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: leander, tx
Age: 37
Posts: 3,235
Rep Power: 13230 ATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respectedATXtexanfan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

he's got a tough job, pac man settled everthing out of court, goodell is trying to police multi-miliionares who are above the law ( oj ), he's working on the fly, no one had ever been caught with tapes such as spygate, how do you set up a punishment? you might as well set an example
ATXtexanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #14
Fox
All Pro
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 753
Rep Power: 414 Fox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
How can you possibly write a rule for the NFL which basically encompasses all human indiscretion and criminal conduct and reduce it to a predictable standard? I get the concern, but don't see how it translates into a solution without more.
Maybe they could set something up with mandatory suspensions based on the number of arrests, with exceptions for increased or permanent suspensions based on the severity of the crime. Aren't crimes already organized into some type of hierarchical scheme, ie. capital offenses, federal offenses etc?

I'm not as up to date as some of you may be but it seems to me like Pac man is basically at Goodell's mercy right now, and Goodell has taken a stance that he will end his suspension when he sees fit. I would feel better about it if he had given explicit instructions like meet these goals (like don't get arrested and do x hours of community service), for this long, and you're back in with the caveat that you are walking on thin ice from now until you retire. As it stands now it seems like he's given him goals, but is not saying he will be reinstated whether or not he achieves them.

Did any of the commissioner's before Goodell suspend players for conduct (other than drugs)? For some reason I thought in the past this was an issue that teams handled individually with their troubled players.

Last edited by Fox; 04-01-2008 at 11:10 PM.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008   #15
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 45,404
Rep Power: 304671 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox View Post
Maybe they could set something up with mandatory suspensions based on the number of arrests, with exceptions for increased or permanent suspensions based on the severity of the crime. Aren't crimes already organized into some type of hierarchical scheme, ie. capital offenses, federal offenses etc?
You certainly could attempt to, but there would always be carping about whether the various crimes deserve the same punishment in a NFL perspective as a criminal one. What do you do about the Michael Vick scenario? He could have been charged with 50+ counts and ended up charged with 1 federal and 4 state counts. What does the NFL use?--are they bound by whatever deal gets worked out?

Quote:
I'm not as up to date as some of you may be but it seems to me like Pac man is basically at Goodell's mercy right now, and Goodell has taken a stance that he will end his suspension when he sees fit. I would feel better about it if he had given explicit instructions like meet these goals (like don't get arrested and do x hours of community service), for this long, and you're back in with the caveat that you are walking on thin ice from now until you retire. As it stands now it seems like he's given him goals, but is not saying he will be reinstated whether or not he achieves them.
Here I totally agree. There should be a well defined path back provided. Don't know what Pacman was told
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008   #16
Blazing Arrow
Work'n da grill
 
Blazing Arrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 37
Posts: 2,906
Rep Power: 258 Blazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via MSN to Blazing Arrow
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

How can C Henry on the Bangles be playing in the league if Pacman is still out. He has been in a fair amount of trouble. If it is conduct unbecoming the league how does a convicted killer play and a player only put on probation out for a season?

Don't take this as a pro Pacman thing, the only thing I am looking for is resolution from the league to end this BS stand off. If he is suspended for life just say it. How are Goodell’s actions by keeping the team dangling fair in his mind?

The suspension was stated as a year. Not some arbitrary number floating around in Goodell's head. If he wants to review the situation then Pacman and his agent and his lawyer and the players union should all meet again review the case and he should make a ruling.
__________________


RIP Steve ... you showed us what a warrior truly is.
Blazing Arrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008   #17
Specnatz
Site Contributor
 
Specnatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,620
Rep Power: 3240 Specnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blazing Arrow View Post
How can C Henry on the Bangles be playing in the league if Pacman is still out. He has been in a fair amount of trouble. If it is conduct unbecoming the league how does a convicted killer play and a player only put on probation out for a season?

Don't take this as a pro Pacman thing, the only thing I am looking for is resolution from the league to end this BS stand off. If he is suspended for life just say it. How are Goodell’s actions by keeping the team dangling fair in his mind?

The suspension was stated as a year. Not some arbitrary number floating around in Goodell's head. If he wants to review the situation then Pacman and his agent and his lawyer and the players union should all meet again review the case and he should make a ruling.
Quote:
December 15, 2005 - Chris Henry was pulled over in Northern Kentucky for speeding and marijuana was found in his shoes. He was also driving without a valid driver's license, and without auto insurance. On January 30, 2006, he was arrested in Orlando for multiple gun charges including concealment and aggravated assault with a firearm[10]. He was reported to have been wearing his Number 15 Bengals jersey at the time of his arrest. Henry pleaded guilty in both cases and avoided jail time in both cases.
May 4, 2006 - Cincinnati media reported that Henry is being investigated by Covington police in connection with a sex crime, which allegedly occurred in a hotel room in Covington, Kentucky early on April 30, 2006. No charges have yet been filed, and on May 24, 2006, Covington police reported that there is no proof anything happened and that the alleged victim might now face charges for filing a false police report.
June 3, 2006 - Chris Henry was pulled over outside on Interstate 275 at 1:18 a.m by Ohio Highway Trooper Michael Shimko. At 2:06 a.m. Henry voluntarily submitted to a breathalyzer test at Milford Police Department and registered a .092 blood-alcohol level, .012 above the level permitted by Ohio law. [11] These charges have since been dismissed as it was proven that the breathalyzer used to test Henry at the scene was faulty. [12]
September 25, 2006 in the early morning, Bengals linebacker Odell Thurman was pulled over for a DUI. The truck Thurman was driving belonged to rookie Reggie McNeal. Neither McNeal nor Chris Henry were charged with any wrongdoing by authorities, however, Bengals Head Coach Marvin Lewis benched Henry for the Bengals loss against the New England Patriots.
October 6, 2006 - Henry was suspended by the NFL for two games for violating the league's personal conduct and substance abuse policies. NFL policies forbid Henry from taking part in practices, however, he was allowed to attend any team meetings. Henry missed the Bengals' October 15, 2006 game at Tampa Bay Buccaneers and their October 22, 2006 game against the Carolina Panthers. [13]
January 25, 2007 - Henry pleaded guilty to charges of providing alcohol to minors, an incident that occurred at a hotel in the spring on 2006. He was sentenced to 90 days in jail, with all but two of those days being suspended. [14]
April 10, 2007 - Henry was suspended for the first eight games of the 2007 NFL season for violations of the NFL's personal conduct policy[15]. His suspension comes with a stern warning that future misconduct may result in the end of his career with the NFL. Henry has since been allowed to begin practicing fully with the Cincinnati Bengals by NFL Commissioner, Roger Goodell. [16] His suspension was lifted and he played in the November 11, game versus the Baltimore Ravens, amassing 4 catches for 99 yards.
May 18, 2007 - Henry allegedly failed a court-mandated drug test, where a field tested resulted in a false positive for taking an opiate, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer. The failed drug test would have been the third violation of the NFL's substance abuse policy. A third violation, per league rules, results in a one-year suspension. In addition to having his suspension increased to 24 games, he would have had to serve an 88 day jail sentence.[17] As of May 23, 2007, the State of Kentucky has reported that Henry in fact did NOT fail a drug test, and that earlier reports to the contrary are erroneous.
June 12, 2007 - Henry allegedly assaulted a 16 year old boy with teammate Reggie McNeal. The claims were later reported to be unfounded [18] and Henry and McNeal have been exonerated.
November 6, 2007 - Henry allegedly assaulted a valet attendant at Newport on the Levee[19].


Please tell me where he was convicted of killing or murder? Now if you are referring another player please state the player who did anything wrong while Goodell has been commissioner? If it is a different commissioner, then just delete your account and stop posting here, because that would mean you do not have a clue and cant afford to buy one.
__________________
The Invisible Poster!
Cynic at work, do not mind me; move along nothing to see here!
Specnatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008   #18
Blazing Arrow
Work'n da grill
 
Blazing Arrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 37
Posts: 2,906
Rep Power: 258 Blazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respectedBlazing Arrow is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via MSN to Blazing Arrow
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Tank Johnson ... I could have made that a little more clear.

But nice job of dodging the point of my post to make yourself feel better. I guess you just did not have an argument though so .... speaking of deleting account?

EDIT: :L Little

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/footb...-charged_x.htm
__________________


RIP Steve ... you showed us what a warrior truly is.

Last edited by Blazing Arrow; 04-02-2008 at 11:52 AM.
Blazing Arrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008   #19
Specnatz
Site Contributor
 
Specnatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,620
Rep Power: 3240 Specnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blazing Arrow View Post
Tank Johnson ... I could have made that a little more clear.

But nice job of dodging the point of my post to make yourself feel better. I guess you just did not have an argument though so .... speaking of deleting account?
Possession of unregistered firearms. No murder or deaths. Next! Not dodging anything. If you can not ask a question without giving false info, how in the world do expect anyone to give you an answer that is correct and well informed?
__________________
The Invisible Poster!
Cynic at work, do not mind me; move along nothing to see here!
Specnatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008   #20
Second Honeymoon
Hall of Fame
 
Second Honeymoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 5,330
Rep Power: 3659 Second Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via ICQ to Second Honeymoon Send a message via Yahoo to Second Honeymoon
Default Re: On Roger Goodell

If PacMan comes to a civil settlement with the bouncer at the strip bar and pays his other restitutions in that particular case, I can not see any reason that Goodell can keep PacMan out of the league. I just think Goodell is letting him twist in the wind a little bit to further illustrate how serious Goodell is about cleaning the league up off-the-field.

I like Goodell although I feel he should have taken away the Patriots #7 pick, not their 31st for the Patriots being cheaters and especially the fact that team leadership was involved in attempting to cover up evidence.
__________________
@DougVanHorne on Twitter (CardinalDoug)
Second Honeymoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger