Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


The National Football League League News & Current Events

View Poll Results: Elimination of the force-out rule
For it 17 39.53%
Against it 23 53.49%
Not sure 3 6.98%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2008   #1
Brando
Site Contributor
 
Brando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,573
Rep Power: 1664 Brando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

They had a debate on this on NFL Network the other day and thought it would be good discussion. Are you for it or against it?

IMO, If you don't get both feet in bounds it should be an incomplete pass. I think it would benefit the defense more than the offense. It would definitely help the Officials and make there job easier.

Thoughts?
__________________

Extra Special Thanks to False Start for the signature!
Brando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #2
The Pencil Neck
Hall of Fame
 
The Pencil Neck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 52
Posts: 16,579
Rep Power: 146985 The Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

I'm all for eliminating that. If you can come down with the ball in-bounds, then it's not complete. Like you said, it makes officiating much easier.

If you think that change favors the defense too much, then make it like college where you only need one foot in bounds to offset the lack of force-out.
The Pencil Neck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #3
kiwitexansfan
Give'm a taste
 
kiwitexansfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Age: 36
Posts: 8,824
Rep Power: 44792 kiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respectedkiwitexansfan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Anything that makes decisions more cut and dry is good for the game. When an official needs to interpret (guess) it opens to many questions and doubts.

The other side of this it is ridiculous to punish a defender for making a good play by pushing a guy out of bounds in the air. Lets reward a good play but giving them an incompletion.
__________________
All random posts made entirely of smilies courtesy of kiwitexansfanjr -age 4
kiwitexansfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #4
tulexan
Hall of Fame
 
tulexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 30
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 27 tulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famer
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Some receivers are going to get lit up on the sidelines now
tulexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #5
rmartin65
I'm Score
 
rmartin65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 24
Posts: 7,896
Rep Power: 53272 rmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

I am against eliminating the rule. You need two feet in. Thats that.
rmartin65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #6
Giant Tiger
Hall of Fame
 
Giant Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Smiths Falls, Heart of the Rideau Canal-UNESCO World Heritage Site
Age: 52
Posts: 1,483
Rep Power: 6605 Giant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respectedGiant Tiger is a quality contributor and well respected
Post Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Quote:
Originally Posted by M Shadows View Post
They had a debate on this on NFL Network the other day and thought it would be good discussion. Are you for it or against it?

IMO, If you don't get both feet in bounds it should be an incomplete pass. I think it would benefit the defense more than the offense. It would definitely help the Officials and make there job easier.

Thoughts?
I agree if a receiver is jumping up to get the ball. But what if a receiver catches the ball in stride along the sidelines & just gets one foot down as he gets pushed out? It's not like landing with one foot in the field as you fall out of bounds.
Giant Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #7
Brando
Site Contributor
 
Brando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,573
Rep Power: 1664 Brando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Some examples on calls in the past.........




2003

The only one I can come up with so far I'll keep looking.
__________________

Extra Special Thanks to False Start for the signature!
Brando is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 03-30-2008   #8
The Pencil Neck
Hall of Fame
 
The Pencil Neck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 52
Posts: 16,579
Rep Power: 146985 The Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmartin65 View Post
I am against eliminating the rule. You need two feet in. Thats that.
You just contradicted yourself.
The Pencil Neck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #9
mattieuk
Site Contributor
 
mattieuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,053
Rep Power: 18345 mattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Two feet in bounds. Simple, don't like the call challenge it.

The force out rule just makes the decisions more prone to being controversial. I'm all for making the refs job easier.
mattieuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #10
ObsiWan
Contributor
 
ObsiWan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: League City, Tx
Age: 62
Posts: 11,757
Rep Power: 116198 ObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

If a WR jumps and makes the catch and would normally come straight down - in bounds - but a DB holds him up and takes him out of bounds so he can't come down - even if it means the DB carries him for a couple of steps... you guys are okay with that?

By your assessment, the WR didn't get two feet down.

I'm against it. Leave the rule as is.
__________________
The two most important days in your life are the day you're born and the day you find out why. -- Mark Twain
ObsiWan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #11
mattieuk
Site Contributor
 
mattieuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,053
Rep Power: 18345 mattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respectedmattieuk is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Quote:
Originally Posted by ObsiWan View Post
If a WR jumps and makes the catch and would normally come straight down - in bounds - but a DB holds him up and takes him out of bounds so he can't come down - even if it means the DB carries him for a couple of steps... you guys are okay with that?

By your assessment, the WR didn't get two feet down.

I'm against it. Leave the rule as is.
But even then he'd have to get one foot down wouldn't he?...

To be honest, I'm not too sure about the technicalities of the rule, I'm just calling it from a spectator's point of view and the obvious frustration it can cause on plays.
mattieuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #12
texdawg
Veteran
 
texdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 2455 texdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respectedtexdawg is a quality contributor and well respected
Angry Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Leave the rule the way it is.

What if a reciever jumps up to catch a ball 3 yards in play and the defender grabs the reciever in air and carries him out of bounds. The reciever did not have 2 feet in bounds-no catch. Defenders will play to let the reciever catch the ball and try to carry them out of bounds. Extreme example, I know, but how peeved would you be if this happened to your reciever?
__________________
"Well, I never thought about it before...but I suppose I'd let the kid go for about $1.99 a pound." FAR SIDE
texdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #13
Brando
Site Contributor
 
Brando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,573
Rep Power: 1664 Brando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

I'm okay with giving the CB's and Safeties the extra advantage because of all the rules that favor the offense. Considering the rules already in place to protect the receivers I think it will not pass.
__________________

Extra Special Thanks to False Start for the signature!
Brando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #14
ObsiWan
Contributor
 
ObsiWan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: League City, Tx
Age: 62
Posts: 11,757
Rep Power: 116198 ObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Quote:
Originally Posted by texdawg View Post
Leave the rule the way it is.

What if a reciever jumps up to catch a ball 3 yards in play and the defender grabs the reciever in air and carries him out of bounds. The reciever did not have 2 feet in bounds-no catch. Defenders will play to let the reciever catch the ball and try to carry them out of bounds. Extreme example, I know, but how peeved would you be if this happened to your reciever?
That's the example I was trying to site. Our guy is a yard away from the sideline but has to jump and catch the ball. The defender grabs our guy before he can land and carries him one or two steps and drops him out of bounds. That's great catch made into an incomplete pass if this rule change is accepted.

Leave the force out rule alone.

You want to help the DBs..?
- Let them jam WRs up to 10 yds past the LOS instead of the 5 yd.
- Or let the DBs have one jam, and one only, no matter how far away from the LOS the contact is made.
- or let them hand-fight all the way down the field... As long as the DB doesn't flat out hold the WR I'm good with letting them battle it out. And if the WR is stronger, he'll create separation. That's the way it used to be.
__________________
The two most important days in your life are the day you're born and the day you find out why. -- Mark Twain
ObsiWan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #15
Mafia Informant
ain't no snitch
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0 Mafia Informant is ridin' the pine
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Quote:
Originally Posted by texdawg View Post
What if a reciever jumps up to catch a ball 3 yards in play and the defender grabs the reciever in air and carries him out of bounds.
The only DBs who could carry a WR out of bounds would be a roided-up Rodney Harrison and the suplex-machine Brian Dawkins.
__________________
Does anyone smell cheese?
Mafia Informant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #16
Fox
All Pro
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 753
Rep Power: 413 Fox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respectedFox is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

I'm against eliminating this rule. Eliminating the rule limits the offenses ability to throw to the sidelines and end zone in my view, and allows defensive backs to play the receiver and not the ball in those instances which I don't like. Defensive backs should be playing the ball, and eliminating the rule gives them a cop out play on the sidelines when they get beat, IMO.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008   #17
Texaninlild
Hall of Fame
 
Texaninlild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mansfield, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 1,430
Rep Power: 4558 Texaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respectedTexaninlild is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to Texaninlild
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

It is a good rule. To me it isn't that hard to call. If I was a defender and they changed the rule that is all I would try to do is wait for the receiver to go into the air and push him out of bounds or carry him out. The defenders would stop playing the ball around the boundaries.
Texaninlild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008   #18
Brando
Site Contributor
 
Brando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,573
Rep Power: 1664 Brando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respectedBrando is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Rich Eisen,Solomon Wilcots, and Jamie Dukes discuss a few of the proposed rule changes including the force-out rule.

3:05 seconds into the clip.

You can tell Solomon played defense......

nfl.com
__________________

Extra Special Thanks to False Start for the signature!
Brando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008   #19
TexansLucky13
53d Signal Batt
 
TexansLucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Maryland
Age: 26
Posts: 4,766
Rep Power: 1061 TexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexansLucky13 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

Personally I could care less what they do with it, so long as it is reviewable, if it is kept. If a ref can make the call from the sidelines than he can make the call from the review booth as well.

How often do you see force outs anyways?? No more than once or twice a game I'd say in most cases.
__________________
TexansLucky13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008   #20
Double Barrel
Modified Simian
 
Double Barrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
Section: Gridiron, Tx
Age: 47
Posts: 29,650
Rep Power: 213437 Double Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Elimination of the force-out rule on receptions and interceptions

There is a reason the rule exists in the first place. Leave it as it is, but let it also fall under replay rules. Replay has to be conclusive to overturn, so the call on the field will be key. Refs do a pretty good most most of the time, IMO.
__________________
"Football is only a diversion." ~ HOUSTON TEXANS
Double Barrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger