1) That makes no sense. If I expect a guy to get 10 sacks in two games and he does it, does that mean he gets a C ? According to your definition it does.
There is so much to shoot down here, I don't know where to start...
Okay, Real, I'll play it this way. Since the grading system is so difficult to understand (and I'm getting tired of repeating it), let's just call it: Above Average Play, As Expected Play, and Less Than Expected Play.
Okoye is doing better than I expected. That's Above Average Play.
Schaub is doing as well as I expected. That's As Expected Play.
Studdard is doing as well as I expected. That, again, is As Expected Play.
Jacoby is not doing as well as I expected. That's Less Than Expected Play.
If you want to talk along these lines (maybe you think Schaub is playing better than you expected, maybe Jacoby is stellar), feel free to.
And yes, I remember all these posts. I stand by them. I think they make good points and continue to be pertinent. Unless you think Schaub hasn't thrown some interceptions and made some bad play calls. But I think in the games you watch, the Texans never lose...
Also, do you remember this thread and this quote:
think there are some very solid reasons to be disconcerted about Matt joining the Texans, some of which have nothing to do with him. His record while playing for Atlanta, for one. His QB rating (average was 69.2), number of passes over 40 (just 4 in four years), number of interceptions (6). I don't think the only argument for not taking Matt is "he is an unknown."
I think it's going to take Schaub time to develop. I think the team is in development mode.
But IMO, with Carr and the second round draft pick, the Texans go 8-8 next year. So for Matt to be worth the trade, the record should reflect that, which means no less than 9-7. I don't think the Texans will go 9-7. I think they will go more like 5-11 because they are still in development. 5-11 being a worse record than 8-8, I think the Texans have essentially said "screw this year. It just isn't our year."
Excellent point! I think the team is still in development, and so is Matt. They are 2-2, with a win against a beleaguered KC Chiefs team, and a loss against a Vick-less Falcons team. It's not like they beat the Colts. There is also a huge void at the #2 CB spot that teams will exploit throughout the season. The Texans still have a ways to go before being the ultralords of football you already have them at. Forgive me if I've chosen a more realistic approach.
We just made Joey Harrington look like Mark Bruenell. Joey Harrington, for Christ's sake! The dude was run out of Detroit! He just beat the Texans.
What about this one:
I think if they really wanted Matt, they would have gotten him. They all had the chance. There must be a reason that those teams chose the quarterbacks they did, and I doubt it was simply that Matt wasn't available. Maybe the problem is that the Texans are the only team who thought Matt was worth two second-round picks.
or this classic:
It's still a house of sand. Even worse, the Texans have a new quarterback with less mobility.
The only way this offense works is Ahman Green. If he can help Salaam/Black/Frye/injured Spencer pick up most of their blocks, then Matt can get the passes off. If Ahman can bring his own blocker and get yardage, then the run-first offense will succeed. However, my instinct is telling me that the Texans are totally off balance without any semblence of a passing game.
That was you three months ago. And now all of a sudden you expected Schaub to be doing what he is doing now.
I haven't wavered. The only way the offense works is Ahman Green. Based on the season so far, it proves my point. With Ahman in, they've had the run game that put them over. Even when replacing him with Dayne, they have still struggled.
And Salaam continues to be beat, and as the games go on, Schaub will start to get sacked more and more. This will get worse as the season goes on until they find a better LT.
I could find a lot of quotes from you that would make you sound totally bogus, but I don't feel the need to post anymore at this point.
Bogus? Why - because I said Matt Schaub would struggle, and he has? Thank you for proving that point. Or is it because I didn't rate him as the greatest thing since Joe Montana?
If you are trying to make the point that he is playing better than I expected, then you must have me mistaken for someone who thought he was a horrible quarterback, which I have never said. I have always taken the position that he will make a great quarterback, but needs time to develop.
I think you are still in the stratosphere where the Texans are going to the SuperBowl and every player is flawless. A third of the season is over. It's time to come down to Earth. They are going to make SOME mistakes, and that's okay. They are going in the right direction, but there is a huge difference between going in the right direction and being the Patriots. It will take time.
Or are you just waiting to call me a Carr-homer again? I think the case is clearly not true, but sticks and stones and all that...