![]() |
|
|||||||
| Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Section: Gridiron, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 27,246
Rep Power: 84022
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Last year the offense seemed like a work in progress, and there was not a lot of consistency from week to week.
Hopefully they will settle that down a bit this year and find something that works. I've got confidence in Kubiak, and hence Sherman, so I'm optimistic that we will see an offense that knows it's own strengths and plays them accordingly. Obviously it's a 'time will tell' type of thing right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 51
Posts: 14,571
Rep Power: 49400
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The most accurate is a good skinfold measurement method. But these methods (like Jackson/Pollock's 3/5/7 site methods) can have their accuracy vary by how good your skinfold calipers are and how good the person pinching the skin is and then, the estimates are based on "normal" bodyfat distribution models. If you have a different bodyfat distribution, it can skew the calculation. Electrical conductance methods are very sensitive to hydration and lots of muscle can mess everything up. Some people mistakenly think that BMI calculates bodyfat percentage, but it doesn't. Some people put a percent sign after that number but BMI is not a percentage and anyone that does that should almost immediately be dismissed as an idjit. BMI is just a height to weight ratio. Fat weighs less than muscle and you actually get a "better" BMI number if you've got a high bodyfat percentage for your height. If you've got a lot of muscle, you weigh more and get a "bad" number. Ooops. That came close to a rant. Sorry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Hall of Fame
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 43
Posts: 3,011
Rep Power: 1079
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The single most important factor in an offense in the NFL is the QB. It determines/limits what the offense you can run.
With that said, I don't think Schuab is like Favre. So, I don't expect a Green Bay ripoff. Likewise, Schuab doesn't seem to be like the prototypical Denver QB that they look for. It seems to me the Texans offense next year is going to completely different from what we have seen in the past and will have some shades from Kubiak's and Sherman's previous coaching days. My thought is it will be something all by itself similar to how the Denver offense is looked at today. Basically it's own system of sort. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |||
|
Hubcap Diamond
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,436
Rep Power: 6068
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I may have asked, "Since they didn't tell you exactly what to weigh, did they give you a weight not to exceed?" Followed up by, "Was that number the same, greater then, or less then what you played at previous to the new coaches arriving?" Then I'd have to ask him the same questions about last season. It seems they've changed policies. Quote:
Quote:
========================== I'm with TC on the hybrid blocking scheme. It was a problem last year.
__________________
Amy glances out the window; her hair, skin, and clothes take on a pronounced reddish tinge from Doppler effect as she drops out of the conversation at relativistic velocity. - Cryptonomicon |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|