Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


The National Football League League News & Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2007   #1
Kaiser Toro
Native Mod
 
Kaiser Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Straight Outta Austin
Age: 44
Posts: 16,084
Rep Power: 54156 Kaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respected
Default The N.F.L. Loses a Cable Ruling

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/sp...rssnyt&emc=rss

snippet:
A Manhattan Supreme Court justice ruled yesterday that Comcast, the nation’s largest cable operator, can carry the NFL Network on a digital sports tier. The decision could roil the channel’s goal to be carried on the levels of digital distribution that would give it the greatest number of subscribers.

The National Football League sued Comcast last year over its plan to put the network on a sports tier on systems recently acquired from Time Warner. Comcast carries the channel on the rest of its systems to about 8 million subscribers on its second-biggest digital tier. Its sports tier is available to about a million homes.

Making the NFL Network available only to those paying about $5 extra monthly for the sports tier would greatly impede its availability.

“The final word on this issue is most likely to come from the appellate courts,” said Seth Palansky, a network spokesman.
__________________
Smell the glove is here
Kaiser Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #2
nunusguy
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,991
Rep Power: 185 nunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiser Toro View Post
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/sp...rssnyt&emc=rss

“The final word on this issue is most likely to come from the appellate courts,” said Seth Palansky, a network spokesman.
And that will be how many years ? Then the loser in the appellate ruling appeals to the SC, right ?
I dunno, but I'm probably gonna have to switch to SAT from TWC to get the NFL Network anytime soon.
Anybody heard anything about U-Verse, an AT&T product ? They reportedly offer the NFL Network.
nunusguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #3
Porky
Hall of Fame
 
Porky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 51
Posts: 12,342
Rep Power: 67402 Porky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I think thats a good decision. It is a sports channel after all. I just don't think a network should be able to dictate to a cable company how they are going to market or distribute a channel.

It doesn't bug me either though. I've had DirectTV almost since it's inception in the early-mid 90's.
__________________
Your local CruiseOne Vacation specialist. www.firstclasscruising.biz Visit me on Facebook.
Porky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #4
powerfuldragon
g'mornin to you
 
powerfuldragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: your lady's sexdreams.
Age: 29
Posts: 17,103
Rep Power: 27214 powerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respectedpowerfuldragon is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to powerfuldragon
Default

that's disappointing.
__________________
disregard above post.
powerfuldragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #5
Double Barrel
Modified Simian
 
Double Barrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
Section: Gridiron, Tx
Age: 48
Posts: 31,740
Rep Power: 398918 Double Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I'm seriously contemplating DirectTV before next football season, mainly because of NFL network.
__________________
"Football is only a diversion." ~ HOUSTON TEXANS
Double Barrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #6
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 49,217
Rep Power: 413804 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porky View Post
I just don't think a network should be able to dictate to a cable company how they are going to market or distribute a channel.
Why not, it is all part of the negotiation of the cable company carrying them at all?
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #7
real
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Barrel View Post
I'm seriously contemplating DirectTV before next football season, mainly because of NFL network.
IMHO, The NFL network is at it's best in the off-season....

NFL Europe games, Classic Games, Games from last season, Football follies,top ten draft steals, top ten draft classes, a look back at past drafts...not to mention total access everyday and inside looks at different teams camps....

I like it during the season, but honeslty I originally got it for the summer when football is scarce...
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 05-11-2007   #8
hollywood_texan
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 3,021
Rep Power: 1649 hollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
Why not, it is all part of the negotiation of the cable company carrying them at all?
Totally agree, but if you read the story in the link, you will see that Comcast is pursuing this structure of programming since they didn't get the games on one of their own channels that the NFL Network is exclusively showing late in the season.

It seems there was some sort of deal and Comcast isn't just pulling this issue up without any regard.

From the article:

Justice Bernard J. Fried found that agreements Comcast had made with the league in 2004 let it shift the NFL Network to a digital sports tier. That permission, Comcast argued, was to go into effect if it did not reach deals to carry eight late-season N.F.L. games on its Versus network for about $400 million a year or for the Sunday Ticket out-of-market package. The games ended up on the NFL Network and Sunday Ticket stayed on DirecTV.

Something tells this is a little more complicated and there are some ruffled feathers over at Comcast.
hollywood_texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #9
BigWig
Bigimus Wigimus
 
BigWig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dripping Springs Tx
Posts: 1,263
Rep Power: 1266 BigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respectedBigWig is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

AT&T will have it because I think, the U-verse is Dish Netwrok under their name.
Iam with the porkster I have had Direct Tv since the 90's also, heck even my programming is a "grandfathered package" no longer available but heck of a deal.
BigWig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #10
Porky
Hall of Fame
 
Porky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 51
Posts: 12,342
Rep Power: 67402 Porky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respectedPorky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
Why not, it is all part of the negotiation of the cable company carrying them at all?

Maybe, but I look at it more like a wholesale/retail deal. IE - I produce a widget. In this case the widget is a TV channel with content. I then seek "retailers". In this case, retailers are those who distribute my content. If nobody likes my widgets/content, then I may not sell any. If they do, I sell it to them. They in turn retail the content to thier users in any manner they wish.

Now, there will be negiotions over the price paid for my product, etc., but I don't tell them how they can display it. I just don't see a scenerio where a wholesale producer of product should be able to force a retailer to distribute it's product at all, much less a certain way. If I make widgets, and Walmart doesn't want to buy it, I move on to the next retailer, while also trying to build a demand for the product so the customers themselves will force Walmart into buying my product. I don't go tell walmart you must put my product on an end cap at the front of the store, and also at all the registers, at least not without some cash favors to pay for product placement.
__________________
Your local CruiseOne Vacation specialist. www.firstclasscruising.biz Visit me on Facebook.
Porky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #11
Specnatz
Site Contributor
 
Specnatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,620
Rep Power: 3241 Specnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respectedSpecnatz is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I have no problem with that, because NFL network is charging the cable company, they just do not want the cable company charging the customer. I have digital cable time warner so this would be ok with me if they would carry the darn thing.
__________________
The Invisible Poster!
Cynic at work, do not mind me; move along nothing to see here!
Specnatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #12
hollywood_texan
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 3,021
Rep Power: 1649 hollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porky View Post
Maybe, but I look at it more like a wholesale/retail deal. IE - I produce a widget. In this case the widget is a TV channel with content. I then seek "retailers". In this case, retailers are those who distribute my content. If nobody likes my widgets/content, then I may not sell any. If they do, I sell it to them. They in turn retail the content to thier users in any manner they wish.

Now, there will be negiotions over the price paid for my product, etc., but I don't tell them how they can display it. I just don't see a scenerio where a wholesale producer of product should be able to force a retailer to distribute it's product at all, much less a certain way. If I make widgets, and Walmart doesn't want to buy it, I move on to the next retailer, while also trying to build a demand for the product so the customers themselves will force Walmart into buying my product. I don't go tell walmart you must put my product on an end cap at the front of the store, and also at all the registers, at least not without some cash favors to pay for product placement.
In your example, The NFL Network is really the manufacturing company, not the wholesaler.

There are deals stipulating requirements if a retailer is going to carry a product. That is how a manufacturer maintains it's Brand and identity. It happens all the time and retailers have to abide by certain agreements if they want to carry certain products.

Having said that, the TV distribution business is very different from the manufacturing business, so your analogy is little difficult to pull off.

From the article, Comcast is not pulling this issue out of thin air. There appears to be a previous agreement on TV distribution that wasn't followed through with by the NFL Network, and therefore Comast can put that channel in it's sports package or whatever it's called. That is what the appear to be arguing over.
hollywood_texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #13
texasguy346
Mod Squad
 
texasguy346's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Deer Park, TX
Age: 31
Posts: 7,097
Rep Power: 3792 texasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexasguy346 is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to texasguy346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Barrel View Post
I'm seriously contemplating DirectTV before next football season, mainly because of NFL network.
I recently switched to DirecTV from TWC. I didn't switch for NFL network, but that was an added benefit. Time Warner was just awful as far as customer service goes & I just got fed up with it. I'm loving it so far.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwallaia View Post
God wants spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.
texasguy346 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #14
DerekLee1
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,298
Rep Power: 1688 DerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respectedDerekLee1 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default NFL Network coming to cable in Houston

Ruling moves NFL Network a step closer to Houston cable boxes

A New York state judge has ruled in favor of Comcast in its carriage dispute with NFL Network, moving Comcast one step closer to adding the channel on its recently acquired Houston cable system.

...

Comcast officials said the company will notify regulators and customers within 30 to 60 days of their plans to launch NFL Network in Houston on a sports tier. A spokesperson said the launch "certainly" would take place before the beginning of the regular season.
DerekLee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #15
V Man
Pumpkinhead
 
V Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alamo City
Age: 47
Posts: 2,591
Rep Power: 19 V Man could be on the next Madden coverV Man could be on the next Madden coverV Man could be on the next Madden coverV Man could be on the next Madden coverV Man could be on the next Madden coverV Man could be on the next Madden cover
Send a message via MSN to V Man
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerekLee1 View Post
Ruling moves NFL Network a step closer to Houston cable boxes

A New York state judge has ruled in favor of Comcast in its carriage dispute with NFL Network, moving Comcast one step closer to adding the channel on its recently acquired Houston cable system.

...

Comcast officials said the company will notify regulators and customers within 30 to 60 days of their plans to launch NFL Network in Houston on a sports tier. A spokesperson said the launch "certainly" would take place before the beginning of the regular season.
Wonder how far behind Time Warner in SA is? I know I heard from a friend that Time Warner was waiting to see what happens with Comcast.
V Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007   #16
nunusguy
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,991
Rep Power: 185 nunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respectednunusguy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

"Comcast officials said the company will notify regulators and customers within 30 to 60 days of their plans to launch NFL Network in Houston on a sports tier. A spokesperson said the launch "certainly" would take place before the beginning of the regular season."
********************************
That statement carries zippo credibility with me.
Comcast was supposed to become the Houston areas cable service provider right after the first of the year, and now in May I'm still waiting for that to happen.
nunusguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007   #17
Vinny
shiny happy fan
 
Vinny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 50
Posts: 21,847
Rep Power: 161784 Vinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respectedVinny is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: The N.F.L. Loses a Cable Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
And that will be how many years ? Then the loser in the appellate ruling appeals to the SC, right ?
I dunno, but I'm probably gonna have to switch to SAT from TWC to get the NFL Network anytime soon.
Anybody heard anything about U-Verse, an AT&T product ? They reportedly offer the NFL Network.
anyone have any updates on uverse?
Quote:
AT&T U-verse Doomed?
February 13, 2007
AT&T logoMany have heard of the difficulties in implementing AT&T's U-verse IPTV service. AT&T's U-verse network is actually a fiber/copper hybrid, which pulls fibers to 3,000 to 5,000 feet from the homes they serve, where it then connects to mini-DSLAMs called "52B" boxes and then it runs copper the last mile to the home. This hybrid approach is a bargain when compared to the $20 billion Verizon is spending to build-out fiber all the way to the home. This hybrid fiber/copper approach gives AT&T a 20Mbps+ link to customers, enough to offer high-speed Internet, VoIP, and the company's IPTV service. The problem is getting towns to grant public right of ways for these massive 52B boxes, which hold DSLAMS, batteries, and cooling gear in rugged, weatherproof cases. Many towns objected or wanted AT&T to sign video franchise agreements. Lawsuits were filed, including cable companies that want to classify U-verse service as a "cable service" to force AT&T to abide by the same build-out rules, which has drastically affected U-verse deployment . In addition, the IPTV service uses proprietary set-top boxes from Microsoft, which had their own share of problems - mostly software related.
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keat...rse-doomed.asp
__________________
http://twitter.com/#!/TexansTalk


"A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves" - Edward R. Murrow
Vinny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007   #18
HoustonFrog
Chitown Frog
 
HoustonFrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 12,418
Rep Power: 32827 HoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: The N.F.L. Loses a Cable Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Barrel View Post
I'm seriously contemplating DirectTV before next football season, mainly because of NFL network.

I have DirectTV now have for the last 2 years and I think it is better and cheaper than cable to start and when I got it I got free DVR, etc I was sold. I love it. I'll never go back to the gauging cable people.
__________________
Desperation is a stinky cologne. -Super Troopers
HoustonFrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007   #19
TEXANS84
Moderator
 
TEXANS84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Age: 37
Posts: 7,479
Rep Power: 3262 TEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANS84 is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to TEXANS84 Send a message via Yahoo to TEXANS84
Default Re: The N.F.L. Loses a Cable Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
"Comcast officials said the company will notify regulators and customers within 30 to 60 days of their plans to launch NFL Network in Houston on a sports tier. A spokesperson said the launch "certainly" would take place before the beginning of the regular season."
********************************
That statement carries zippo credibility with me.
Comcast was supposed to become the Houston areas cable service provider right after the first of the year, and now in May I'm still waiting for that to happen.
June 19th is the official switchover date. I was hoping that NFLN would be available then, but it looks like a 30-60 day grace period of notification before its availalbe. boo.
TEXANS84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger