Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft The future stars of the NFL

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2007   #1
Heywood
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 414
Rep Power: 9 Heywood is ridin' the pine
Default saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

it's kind of jarring, $32 million guaranteed and still no give from those fantrash who moralize against players being paid.

Last edited by Heywood; 01-03-2007 at 05:05 PM.
Heywood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007   #2
threetoedpete
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Age: 58
Posts: 6,644
Rep Power: 142 threetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

We've had this war before. Life is not fair. Walt Disney is not God. And no one forced Bama to offer an absurd contract. The players do get a small stiphoned. Plus an education , loan free, that most poor and middle class folks would die for. Whoever told you life is fair...lied. No one is forced to play college football. Bama wants to be foolish with their money so what ?
__________________
"Everybody understands that the only way we're going to do it is by extremely hard work."

Last edited by threetoedpete; 01-03-2007 at 08:21 PM.
threetoedpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007   #3
Lucky
Moderator
 
Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13,054
Rep Power: 136980 Lucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

Quote:
Originally Posted by threetoedpete View Post
...The players do get a small stiphoned.
??? I guess it's about where the players get the small "stiphoned" in terms of all the money generated by D1 college football. If Bama wants to be foolish with their money and give a high school QB a $million on top of the cost of his education, what's wrong with that? Oh, NCAA rules that keep schools from competing for athletes in this manner. No rules to stop them from giving a coach $32 mil.

Why does the NCAA have rules which forbid schools from offering athletes anything more than tuition, room, and board? Because some schools would be more able to pay athletes, thus creating unfair imbalances in competition. So why doesn't the same standard apply to hiring coaches? Mississippi State can't afford to pay a coach $32 million. How will they ever be able to hire a top coach? If it's OK to cap what an athlete is "paid", why isn't it OK to cap a coach's salary? If it's all about a level playing field?
__________________
“We’re looking for a coach that...works with great energy and enthusiasm and very positive in his approach.” - Bob McNair
Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007   #4
threetoedpete
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Age: 58
Posts: 6,644
Rep Power: 142 threetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

Gambleing ? Sabin has signed Acroding to redzone. Gotta ask why on anthing...follow the money.

http://www.theredzone.org/news/showa...ArticleID=4799
__________________
"Everybody understands that the only way we're going to do it is by extremely hard work."
threetoedpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007   #5
Heywood
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 414
Rep Power: 9 Heywood is ridin' the pine
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky View Post
??? I guess it's about where the players get the small "stiphoned" in terms of all the money generated by D1 college football. If Bama wants to be foolish with their money and give a high school QB a $million on top of the cost of his education, what's wrong with that? Oh, NCAA rules that keep schools from competing for athletes in this manner. No rules to stop them from giving a coach $32 mil.

Why does the NCAA have rules which forbid schools from offering athletes anything more than tuition, room, and board? Because some schools would be more able to pay athletes, thus creating unfair imbalances in competition. So why doesn't the same standard apply to hiring coaches? Mississippi State can't afford to pay a coach $32 million. How will they ever be able to hire a top coach? If it's OK to cap what an athlete is "paid", why isn't it OK to cap a coach's salary? If it's all about a level playing field?

if this site has a HOF i'd like to nominate this post.
Heywood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007   #6
jdog
All Pro
 
jdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 838
Rep Power: 16 jdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden coverjdog could be on the next Madden cover
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky View Post
??? I guess it's about where the players get the small "stiphoned" in terms of all the money generated by D1 college football. If Bama wants to be foolish with their money and give a high school QB a $million on top of the cost of his education, what's wrong with that? Oh, NCAA rules that keep schools from competing for athletes in this manner. No rules to stop them from giving a coach $32 mil.

Why does the NCAA have rules which forbid schools from offering athletes anything more than tuition, room, and board? Because some schools would be more able to pay athletes, thus creating unfair imbalances in competition. So why doesn't the same standard apply to hiring coaches? Mississippi State can't afford to pay a coach $32 million. How will they ever be able to hire a top coach? If it's OK to cap what an athlete is "paid", why isn't it OK to cap a coach's salary? If it's all about a level playing field?
If they were half as strict on campaign finance we'd have a better government, but what is more important college sports or our government?
jdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007   #7
Sarg01
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 13 Sarg01 is a Pro BowlerSarg01 is a Pro Bowler
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

I hadn't heard the NCAA ever saying anything about the problem being one of fairness. Rather, I've always heard the argument being that the players are presumably students first and players second.

Thus all the "if you hire an agent you're done" rules and the prohibitions on appearing in advertisements or major sporting events (if I recall correctly, they make exceptions for the Olympics and that's about it)
Sarg01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 01-04-2007   #8
Lucky
Moderator
 
Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13,054
Rep Power: 136980 Lucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarg01 View Post
I hadn't heard the NCAA ever saying anything about the problem being one of fairness. Rather, I've always heard the argument being that the players are presumably students first and players second.
NCAA athletes can get paid in sports they aren't playing in college. Ricky Williams & Cedric Benson played minor league baseball while in college. If the NCAA wanted their athletes completely amateur, they wouldn't allow pros from other sports to compete.

In effect, the ban on paying NCAA athletes is a salary cap of sorts. It keeps the schools' labor costs down by not allowing a "foolish school" such as Alabama from starting a signing bonus war to acquire players. How much $$$ comes from college football TV contracts, ticket sales, and merchandise? And it's spread (not evenly) over about 120 Division I schools? It's a cash cow that, for the most part, players don't get to feed off.
__________________
“We’re looking for a coach that...works with great energy and enthusiasm and very positive in his approach.” - Bob McNair
Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007   #9
Ride 'Em
Rookie
 
Ride 'Em's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clear Lake
Age: 34
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 0 Ride 'Em is ridin' the pine
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

If schools paid players to come and play football then the vast majority of other teams would shut down. Football (and at some schools basketball) is the cash cow that funds the rest of the athletic department.

You want to pay players? Fine, but that means no more track, baseball, tennis, volleyball, soccer, etc., at least not at a Div-1 level.

Players get scholarships, fees, books, room and board (usually much better food and lodging that average students), the best tutors on campus, outstanding medical care including any needed surgeries and rehab FOR FREE. And the benefits go on and on.

Do they deserve a little extra something with all the revenue generation? Probably. But unfortunately all the money is providing for other sports and filling their coaches' increasingly fat pockets.
__________________
Ride 'Em Cowboys!
Ride 'Em is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007   #10
Lucky
Moderator
 
Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13,054
Rep Power: 136980 Lucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ride 'Em View Post
Do they deserve a little extra something with all the revenue generation? Probably. But unfortunately all the money is providing for other sports and filling their coaches' increasingly fat pockets.
Well, that was the major point of the thread. The inequity between what the coaches and players receive for their efforts.

You make a good point regarding the non-revenue producing sports. Few schools could pay their athletes across the board. That's why football and basketball players would have to become legitimate employees of the university, rather than student-athletes. You give the players salaries and benefits, while making enrollment and academic competency conditions of employment. Title IX is taken out of play.

Why won't the NCAA schools go to an employee-athlete system? Because, they make more $$$ under the student-athlete system. And until football and/or basketball players decide to unionize their ranks, that's how it will be.
__________________
“We’re looking for a coach that...works with great energy and enthusiasm and very positive in his approach.” - Bob McNair
Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007   #11
Heywood
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 414
Rep Power: 9 Heywood is ridin' the pine
Default Re: saban's deal and the players still get no stipends

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky View Post
Well, that was the major point of the thread. The inequity between what the coaches and players receive for their efforts.

You make a good point regarding the non-revenue producing sports. Few schools could pay their athletes across the board. That's why football and basketball players would have to become legitimate employees of the university, rather than student-athletes. You give the players salaries and benefits, while making enrollment and academic competency conditions of employment. Title IX is taken out of play.

Why won't the NCAA schools go to an employee-athlete system? Because, they make more $$$ under the student-athlete system. And until football and/or basketball players decide to unionize their ranks, that's how it will be.
you should get a blog- your stuff is very high quality L.
Heywood is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger