Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management.

View Poll Results: Has the defense improved because of the shift from the 3-4 to the 4-3?
Yes, the 4-3 is better than the 3-4. 33 55.93%
The 4-3 is just as good as the 3-4. 20 33.90%
No, the 4-3 is worse than the 3-4. 6 10.17%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2006   #1
Texans Horror
Hall of Fame
 
Texans Horror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 2,303
Rep Power: 25 Texans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of Famer
Default 4-3 vs. 3-4

The defensive line was the biggest overhaul this past offseason (except for the coaching staff). With the season almost over, I was wondering what people thought of the defensive unit and whether it has improved by way of the new scheme or if it is as bad or worse than before.

Personally, I think it is looking better, and I think the Texans got better performances from key people who have played in both systems (TJ, Babin).
__________________
"It is what it is."
Texans Horror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #2
Bubbajwp
All Flopper
 
Bubbajwp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the Warehouse
Age: 27
Posts: 3,198
Rep Power: 140 Bubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respectedBubbajwp is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

depends on the players more.
__________________
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Specnatz View Post
Actually he is an A-Hole because he is an A-hole. just like a tiger is a tiger because he is a tiger.
Bubbajwp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #3
Ryan
THIS YEAR
 
Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Beaumont,Tx
Section: Section 135, Row F
Posts: 5,129
Rep Power: 13416 Ryan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respectedRyan is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to Ryan
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

the defense has improved and is getting better..but i dont know if it is thanks to the 4-3.
Ryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #4
TheOgre
Hall of Fame
 
TheOgre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Back in the cellar again
Posts: 3,739
Rep Power: 17 TheOgre was voted MVPTheOgre was voted MVPTheOgre was voted MVPTheOgre was voted MVP
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

It isn't a 3-4 vs. a 4-3 thing so much as we never had the talent for the 3-4. The 3-4 defense is more sensitive to talent IMO than the 4-3. In other words, the 3-4 utilizes, yet also exposes, your talent more. You can cover up bad talent easier in the 4-3 than the 3-4.
__________________
"...the Texans select...Adrian Peterson, RB, University of Oklahoma."
TheOgre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #5
Texan_Bill 
Subscribed Contributor
 
Texan_Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston. Mediocrity Lives Here!!
Section: Bull Pen!!
Age: 47
Posts: 48,098
Rep Power: 101383 Texan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respectedTexan_Bill is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOgre View Post
It isn't a 3-4 vs. a 4-3 thing so much as we never had the talent for the 3-4. The 3-4 defense is more sensitive to talent IMO than the 4-3. In other words, the 3-4 utilizes, yet also exposes, your talent more. You can cover up bad talent easier in the 4-3 than the 3-4.
I agree... Personnel to fit a particular system is the most important thing... We did not ever reach the talent level needed to run a 3-4. It can be a very effective defense (see San Diego, Pittsburgh past, New England, etc.)

http://daily.nysun.com/Repository/ge.../17&ID=Ar01400
Texan_Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #6
dbspi
Veteran
 
dbspi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 360
Rep Power: 11 dbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballotdbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOgre View Post
It isn't a 3-4 vs. a 4-3 thing so much as we never had the talent for the 3-4. The 3-4 defense is more sensitive to talent IMO than the 4-3. In other words, the 3-4 utilizes, yet also exposes, your talent more. You can cover up bad talent easier in the 4-3 than the 3-4.
Every other team were able to find right personnel to run 3-4 defense except Capers. One example to look at would be Cowboys, they converted to 3-4 defense two years letter then us but look at their team now.

Previous management and coaching staff had absolutely no eye for talent. Capers had stated when he drafted Babin that he can play like Gregg LLoyd. I don't see even 1% resemblance to Lloyd game in Babin. Another wasted high pick.

I don't know exactly what Mr. Bob McNair show in those two guys to bring them aboard. They have sent our team back at least 5 years. capers is good DC and that is all he will ever be, he doesn't have the vision to ever be HC.

Personally speaking I love 3-4 defense but you need the right coach to lead with aside from personnel. I would have preferred Capers to be our DC rather then HC.
dbspi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #7
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 33,344
Rep Power: 194858 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOgre View Post
It isn't a 3-4 vs. a 4-3 thing so much as we never had the talent for the 3-4. The 3-4 defense is more sensitive to talent IMO than the 4-3. In other words, the 3-4 utilizes, yet also exposes, your talent more. You can cover up bad talent easier in the 4-3 than the 3-4.
I see it totally opposite... I think talent has to be superior in the 4-3, because that guy in front of you knows you're coming. You've got to be bigger, faster or stronger than he is, or you won't do much of anything.

In the 3-4.... the trick is to fool them so they don't know who is coming. Dropping a LB into coverage is more effective in a 3-4 than dropping 290lb DEs..

The 3-4 takes Brains, the 4-3 takes brawn.

plus you're always running against a 5 man front in a 3-4, as opposed to a 4 man front in a 4-3.

the problem, going from a 3-4 to a 4-3 is usually finding DEs that will impact the game. Our problem for some reason was/is finding LBs..... I guess with 4 on the field, it's easier to cover the underneath routes than it is with three LBs in a 4-3.
__________________
thunderkyss is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 12-21-2006   #8
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 33,344
Rep Power: 194858 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbspi View Post
Every other team were able to find right personnel to run 3-4 defense except Capers. One example to look at would be Cowboys, they converted to 3-4 defense two years letter then us but look at their team now.

Previous management and coaching staff had absolutely no eye for talent. Capers had stated when he drafted Babin that he can play like Gregg LLoyd. I don't see even 1% resemblance to Lloyd game in Babin. Another wasted high pick.

I don't know exactly what Mr. Bob McNair show in those two guys to bring them aboard. They have sent our team back at least 5 years. capers is good DC and that is all he will ever be, he doesn't have the vision to ever be HC.

Personally speaking I love 3-4 defense but you need the right coach to lead with aside from personnel. I would have preferred Capers to be our DC rather then HC.


Yeah, I like Babin, but I don't see any Gregg LLoyd in him.

But if you look at Dallas' 3-4, and ours.... they were totally different.

we had a svelt NT, but big bodied DEs...... didn't make sense to me.

Dallas, and New England, and SanDiego, and Pittsburgh, and SF all have svelt DEs, and big bodied NTs...

Jason Ferguson for the Cowboys look more like TJ & Robair Smith(that would have been my NT if I were calling the shots.......), and Richard Seymour, Chris Canty, Marcus Spears look like Mario Williams.
__________________
thunderkyss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #9
Hervoyel
The Right Track
 
Hervoyel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 49
Posts: 14,550
Rep Power: 225674 Hervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respectedHervoyel is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Anyones 4-3 is better than Vic Fangios 3-4.

That being said the defense is better because we've added some talent and are running a system (4-3) that a lot of our existing talent is better suited to playing. We have also put a few guys out of position by making the change but we obviously helped more than we hurt.

Of course anyones defense is going to be in for a long day if it's playing alongside the 2006 Houston Texans offense.
__________________
A wise man once said "...well at this point it's all been hashed out and you either see it or don't. Hoping for a win next week" - HTown2ATX
Hervoyel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #10
painekiller
Hall of Fame
 
painekiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the West Belt
Age: 51
Posts: 2,051
Rep Power: 1965 painekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respectedpainekiller is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Either defense depend on the front 7. And we never had the right guys in the 3-4. But the problem is we currently do not have the right guys for the 4-3. We are still an OLB away at the very least.

I hope we see alot of Anderson these last 2 games, he seems to be making plays. If he can become an all around SAM LB, that will save this team some time and free up a draft choice for the secondary or DT. Not saying he will be this guy but he has earned some more playing time. Find out now on the field.
painekiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #11
Grid
Hall of Fame
 
Grid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2272 Grid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

the 4-3 is as good as the 3-4.. there have been top defenses from both systems.

I prefer the 4-3 because:

1. It is a straight forward defense that focuses on the fun stuff.. like sacking the QB

2. It is better against the run

3. When those elite LB and DE prospects come out, you can actually draft one instead of going back and forth about whether they can gain/lose 20 pounds to fit into a 3-4 position.



My favorite kind of defense to watch is a 4-3 that puts emphasis on speed. I love to see a fast, athletic defense that is all over the field. Very entertaining to me.
Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2006   #12
Drager
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0 Drager is ridin' the pine
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Any defense(3-4 or 4-3) is better if you've got talented personnel. Look at the Bears from '85 to '86. They go from the attacking "46"-defense to a bend-but-don't-break approach. Both years they dominated defensively because they had some really good players.

I like our defense. I think it's easier to run a 4-3 without the right personnel than it is to run a 3-4 w/o the right people. They've played so much better since that opening 4-game stretch. They really looked confused back then. They seem to be executing much better & I like our aggressive play. I would like to see Mario getting more QB pressures, but I know he's playing on a bad foot right now. But next year he'd better apply pressure on QB's alot more consistently. But he has shown some flashes. I also hope we can get some serious upgrades at both safety positions for next. Brown & Earl make alot of mistakes. I've seen alot of missed tackles, taking bad angles to the ball carrier, & seeing them bite on the short route as the deep guy goes sprinting by is pretty damn scary.

I like fast, blitzing 4-3's like Jim Johnson's in Philly. I hate watching crappy-ass prevent defenses. I'd rather take a chance & try to force them into an error rather than sitting back & getting taken apart. I like the Texans aggressive play calling on D. Yeah, it may have cost us the Titans game, but I liked the blitz on that final play. I mean, pretty much the only way we get pressure on any QB is with our blitzes. It will be alot better to watch those blitzes when we have a better secondary. Dunta's needs help in the secondary pretty bad. But that's in addition to all of our other holes.

Last edited by Drager; 12-21-2006 at 11:54 PM.
Drager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #13
ATX
Hall of Fame
 
ATX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin
Age: 34
Posts: 9,563
Rep Power: 144 ATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respectedATX is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

I believe it comes down mostly to personnel and who can fit in your system.

The advantage personnel wise in the 3-4 is that you need less linemen, which are harder to come by than LBs. Well that's what Capers said.....remember when he used to have like 20-30 LBs in training camp when Capers was here?
ATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #14
BattleRedToro
Thread Killer
 
BattleRedToro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 2,432
Rep Power: 3989 BattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respectedBattleRedToro is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grid View Post
the 4-3 is as good as the 3-4.. there have been top defenses from both systems.

I prefer the 4-3 because:

1. It is a straight forward defense that focuses on the fun stuff.. like sacking the QB

2. It is better against the run

3. When those elite LB and DE prospects come out, you can actually draft one instead of going back and forth about whether they can gain/lose 20 pounds to fit into a 3-4 position.



My favorite kind of defense to watch is a 4-3 that puts emphasis on speed. I love to see a fast, athletic defense that is all over the field. Very entertaining to me.
There are many that say that a 3-4 is better against the run than a 4-3. I agree with others that what matters most is if you have the right personnel for the system you are running and second is the playcalling. In general, it is better to be unpredictable, but if you are going to be predictable then your team needs to master the execution of their play.
__________________
"Hey fool, this ain't no football game!" - Mr. T
BattleRedToro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #15
Second Honeymoon
Hall of Fame
 
Second Honeymoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 5,330
Rep Power: 3658 Second Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respectedSecond Honeymoon is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via ICQ to Second Honeymoon Send a message via Yahoo to Second Honeymoon
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by atxcoolguy View Post
I believe it comes down mostly to personnel and who can fit in your system.

The advantage personnel wise in the 3-4 is that you need less linemen, which are harder to come by than LBs. Well that's what Capers said.....remember when he used to have like 20-30 LBs in training camp when Capers was here?
my thoughts exactly. go with what you know and stop trying to let a system dictate who and what you draft.
__________________
@DougVanHorne on Twitter (CardinalDoug)
Second Honeymoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #16
dbspi
Veteran
 
dbspi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 360
Rep Power: 11 dbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballotdbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderkyss View Post
Yeah, I like Babin, but I don't see any Gregg LLoyd in him.

But if you look at Dallas' 3-4, and ours.... they were totally different.

we had a svelt NT, but big bodied DEs...... didn't make sense to me.

Dallas, and New England, and SanDiego, and Pittsburgh, and SF all have svelt DEs, and big bodied NTs...

Jason Ferguson for the Cowboys look more like TJ & Robair Smith(that would have been my NT if I were calling the shots.......), and Richard Seymour, Chris Canty, Marcus Spears look like Mario Williams.
This is what I was trying to point out. Previous management and the coaching staff had absolutely no idea how to build a team and obviously they also had absolutely NO eye for the talent.

I know this statement is very harsh against Capers since he had a great reputations as a 3-4 GURU but this is also a fact. I don't know who contributed how much into deciding on personnel decision but 95% of the selections were bad. Except for AJ and DRob we wasted our draft picks the first 3 or 4 years.

I have never been a cowboys fans and that team was just as bad as these Texans 5 years ago but I just love what Parcell has done with their defense. They are not a finished product by any means but they sure look good right now.

Imagine how we could have been if coaching staff and management had made good decision with the personel move.

Explanation given to us by Capers after selecting Babin was that he sees allot of GREG LLOYD in Babin play where as I don't see any thing in Babin that will indicate to me that is any resemblence of Lloyd.

The last two draft picks by Capers Babin and Travis Johnson are both wasted picks. They are both nothing more then high priced back ups. Johnson is not motivated enough to play every down and Babin has become situational player who comes in 3rd down. Look what we had to give up to acquire Babin. Instead of Travis Johnson we could have had Derrick Johnson from UT to play along with Demeco right now.

Kubiak has done a good job with his draft picks last year. All the picks has been solid GOLD. He needs to do the same for the next 4-5 years for us to have any chance to become respectable in this league. It won't happen with one or two year draft picks. Even with good draft picks next year I don't expect us to be 500 ball club. It will require atleast 2008 draft picks before we reach 500 ball club unless Texans spend enormous amount of money in free agency this off season.

One has to remember previous management has wasted money in free agency. I expect Kubiak to clean house this off season of all the dead weights and non productive players with high salaries.

Last edited by dbspi; 12-22-2006 at 02:12 AM.
dbspi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #17
dbspi
Veteran
 
dbspi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 360
Rep Power: 11 dbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballotdbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

I wish we had some one like Jimmy Johnson as our DC. I simply love his game planning and agressive attitude on the field by his defense.

He reminds me in allot of ways to Buddy Ryans.
dbspi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #18
dbspi
Veteran
 
dbspi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 360
Rep Power: 11 dbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballotdbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

We won't see real Mario till we build the DL. Opposing teams target Mario from get go and he gets double and tripple team every time. We need better DT's in our line up who can collapse the pocket. Payne is not the answer for us at DT position and Travis Johnson lacks consistency.

The reason Julius Pepper is do dominant is because he has supporting cast on his defensive line to take double blockers and collapse the pocket. Presently Mario doesn't have that luxury.
dbspi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #19
Drager
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0 Drager is ridin' the pine
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Buddy Ryan does have two sons in the NFL. Not a surprise that they're both DC's!!! Son Rob has done good things with little at Oakland. Rex has also done an outstanding job at Baltimore. The Ravens are number #1 in yardage allowed & points. Not too bad to have sons coaching the #1 & #4 defense in the NFL.

While I'd like to have Rex as our DC, I think Smith has done a good job. Our defense has come a long way. They should be even better next year. At least I hope.
Drager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2006   #20
dbspi
Veteran
 
dbspi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 360
Rep Power: 11 dbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballotdbspi is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default Re: 4-3 vs. 3-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drager View Post
Buddy Ryan does have two sons in the NFL. Not a surprise that they're both DC's!!! Son Rob has done good things with little at Oakland. Rex has also done an outstanding job at Baltimore. The Ravens are number #1 in yardage allowed & points. Not too bad to have sons coaching the #1 & #4 defense in the NFL.

While I'd like to have Rex as our DC, I think Smith has done a good job. Our defense has come a long way. They should be even better next year. At least I hope.
Yes Smith has done a great job no doubt. We still lack so many pieces on defense but year or two it will be really good if the management fill in all the gaps.

1. We need solid DT play - TJ has been inconsistent for most part but we still need one more DT to play along with him who can collapse the pocket and free Mario of double teams. I think Payne career is pretty much over.
2. We need OLB who can play along with Demeco.
3. We need stud CB who can play along with DRob.
4. We need good FS
5. Once # 1-4 requirements is met then we will also need a stud DE opposite to Mario who can flat out chase the QB all day.

I really like to see Texans give blank check to Nate Clements this off season and sign him and pursue Sand (DT from Oakland) this off season. Draft FS and OLB.
Sands is playing behind two hall of famer but he is stud in every sense and he never takes plays off. He collapses the pocket and is good in both run defense as well as pass defense.

Sands (DT) - 6'7 335 llb

Last edited by dbspi; 12-22-2006 at 03:57 AM.
dbspi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger