![]() |
|
|||||||
| Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Working?
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston
Age: 29
Posts: 15,334
Rep Power: 34917
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Preseason doesn't mean anything. Obviously if you look awful in preseason, it should be a warning. But good preseason play against vanilla Ds doesn't really mean a thing.
Lundy and Morency are the perfect examples: Both had Excellent with a capital E preseasons, and both haven't transitioned that into regular season. Our D had an excellent preseason, again, no translation. Our pass rush was awsome in the preason. So why should Sage's good presason (against #2 and 3 defenses, nonetheless) mean he will translate into our savior at QB? I know Carr's numbers were padded because of the prevent D, but the fact remains that he is playing much better than a lot of people are giving him credit for, considering we never seem to get good field position (can't make a stop on D and our KR situation only recently seems to have been resolved) and the OL that never ceases to redefine the word swiss cheese.
__________________
Adios until next season. See you then |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|