Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft The future stars of the NFL

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2006   #1
tsip
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,277
Rep Power: 13 tsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVP
Default ...just curious

I may be wrong on this but I thought the consensus last year was that the 1st draft pick was for need and the rest were for BPA, or do I have it reversed?
tsip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #2
HJam72
Hall of Fame
 
HJam72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Over here.
Age: 41
Posts: 11,556
Rep Power: 75697 HJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Yeah, I think you've got it backwards.
HJam72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #3
tsip
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,277
Rep Power: 13 tsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HJam72
Yeah, I think you've got it backwards.
Ok, so that would mean Travis Johnson was BPA last year and not for need...hmmm, interesting!!
tsip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #4
HJam72
Hall of Fame
 
HJam72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Over here.
Age: 41
Posts: 11,556
Rep Power: 75697 HJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respectedHJam72 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I don't know about that, I'm just speaking in general. What # was he picked in the draft?
HJam72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #5
tsip
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,277
Rep Power: 13 tsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HJam72
I don't know about that, I'm just speaking in general. What # was he picked in the draft?
1st round
tsip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #6
tiger06
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texarkana, TX
Age: 26
Posts: 265
Rep Power: 11 tiger06 is ridin' the pine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HJam72
I don't know about that, I'm just speaking in general. What # was he picked in the draft?
16th

you should draft BPA within reason at the top of the draft, then fill needs in the later rounds
tiger06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #7
hollywood_texan
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 3,021
Rep Power: 1649 hollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I think it was kind of both. They probably wanted an offensive lineman but no one was there that they wanted. Probably why they traded down a few spots.

Then picked a player on the second need list, defensive line.

Interesting though, we traded down and New Orleans took a tackle from Oklahoma, Jammal Brown.

If I remember last year correctly, offensive line was a little light.
hollywood_texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 04-27-2006   #8
tsip
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,277
Rep Power: 13 tsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger06
16th

you should draft BPA within reason at the top of the draft, then fill needs in the later rounds
My point is that Johnson was need, not BPA in the 1st round when Texans picked. From the mock drafts, virtually every other team is going for need with their 1st pick. Bush is not a need.
tsip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #9
hollywood_texan
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 3,021
Rep Power: 1649 hollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger06
16th

you should draft BPA within reason at the top of the draft, then fill needs in the later rounds
I hear that thrown out at as fact and I don't understand why. If a guy doesn't fit a need and/or your system, what is the point? For example, Detriot has picked a WR for three years in a row in the top 10. I am sure all three of them were the BPA.

Maybe that is where the reason part comes in that you mention.

Please explain this though as you understand it because this statement is just throw out there and I have never heard why it is so important.

My opinion, is it better to build a proven system that allows interchangeable parts on talent that is readily available. Look at Pittsburgh, New England, and Denver. They don't seem to get caught up in the BPA arguement. They draft to their system.
hollywood_texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #10
Sarg01
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Age: 39
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 13 Sarg01 is a Pro BowlerSarg01 is a Pro Bowler
Default

My personal rule is that your first rounder has to start by the midpoint of the season (except franchise QBs). 2nd rounders have to start by their 2nd year. 3rd rounders have to start by the 3rd year. Second-day picks are backups.

It's sort of a midpoint between BPA and need.
Sarg01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #11
4Texans
Hall of Fame
 
4Texans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,054
Rep Power: 46 4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywood_texan
I Look at Pittsburgh, New England, and Denver. They don't seem to get caught up in the BPA arguement. They draft to their system.
Those guys haven't really drafted very high in the first round over the years, so I would agree that they draft according to their needs. I think in the top 10 or less of the 1st round those guys are going to look at the BPA first and needs second.

I would agree that we need defense first, but if you compare our need to BPA with the #1 pick overall. BPA wins out. If the Texans could have gotten a great deal they would have traded out of the #1 pick, IMO.

Everyone has a different philosophy with the draft, and it depends on the talent levels year by year. Al Davis has always said you never pass up someone who can score touchdowns regardless of BPA or Need. If the Raiders had the #1 pick, who do you think they would go after this year?
__________________
Born and raised a Texan... How 'bout you?
4Texans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #12
Sarg01
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Age: 39
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 13 Sarg01 is a Pro BowlerSarg01 is a Pro Bowler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Texans

Everyone has a different philosophy with the draft, and it depends on the talent levels year by year. Al Davis has always said you never pass up someone who can score touchdowns regardless of BPA or Need. If the Raiders had the #1 pick, who do you think they would go after this year?
Vince Young. But Al Davis is a pretty poor drafter.
Sarg01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #13
Texas_Thrill
Hall of Fame
 
Texas_Thrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: H-Town stomping once again!
Age: 34
Posts: 1,473
Rep Power: 12 Texas_Thrill is on the Pro-Bowl ballotTexas_Thrill is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default

I think when you're drafting in the top 5 or 10 even most folks are assuming BPA b/c you're so bad any body you pick will help.

At bottom end where there are playoff teams they have weaknesses they want to shore up so they can pick more for need.

That's always been my logic behind the thinking.

Detroit is a very SPECIAL case of stupidity HOWEVER if you look at C. Rogers who has been pretty much MIA that pick of M. Williams could turn out to be alright especially if C Rog can never get his ish together.
__________________
Texans messageboard.....where everyone is a damn draft expert.
Texas_Thrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #14
hollywood_texan
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 44
Posts: 3,021
Rep Power: 1649 hollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respectedhollywood_texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas_Thrill
I think when you're drafting in the top 5 or 10 even most folks are assuming BPA b/c you're so bad any body you pick will help.

At bottom end where there are playoff teams they have weaknesses they want to shore up so they can pick more for need.

That's always been my logic behind the thinking.

Detroit is a very SPECIAL case of stupidity HOWEVER if you look at C. Rogers who has been pretty much MIA that pick of M. Williams could turn out to be alright especially if C Rog can never get his ish together.
Thanks, that makes sense.
hollywood_texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #15
4Texans
Hall of Fame
 
4Texans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,054
Rep Power: 46 4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarg01
Vince Young. But Al Davis is a pretty poor drafter.
VY just may be his guy, regardless of where they're drafting.
__________________
Born and raised a Texan... How 'bout you?
4Texans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #16
tsip
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,277
Rep Power: 13 tsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVP
Default ...upgrade

"I think when you're drafting in the top 5 or 10 even most folks are assuming BPA b/c you're so bad any body you pick will help."

I believe there is another point to make here--true, you may have many needs, so why would you take a player that does not fill a need? Too, there may be a player that is a 'once in a lifetime' player at a need position, so why would you not take him? I think the first round pick is for a 'critical' need position, a player that can offer a major immediate upgrade to that position. IMO, this thought is particularly true with the 1st pick of the draft!! How often does a team get one of those?

Two yrs ago, DD had almost 1800 all purpose yds and 10 tds. Is Bush going to be a major upgrade at that position?
tsip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #17
4Texans
Hall of Fame
 
4Texans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,054
Rep Power: 46 4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

[quote=tsip Two yrs ago, DD had over 1500 all purpose yds and 10 tds. Is Bush going to be a major upgrade at that position?[/QUOTE]

If Bush can play all 16 games, get over 2000 all purpose yards, and 10+ TDs, I think he will be an upgrade. And he has the potential to do that. All draft choices are based on potential, and he has the potential to be a player that only comes along once a decade are so..... Only time will tell....

Not to mention, what are defenses going to do with Bush and Davis in the same backfield, along with AJ and Moulds outside?
__________________
Born and raised a Texan... How 'bout you?
4Texans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #18
tsip
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,277
Rep Power: 13 tsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVPtsip was voted MVP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Texans
If Bush can play all 16 games, get over 2000 all purpose yards, and 10+ TDs, I think he will be an upgrade. And he has the potential to do that. All draft choices are based on potential, and he has the potential to be a player that only comes along once a decade are so..... Only time will tell....

Not to mention, what are defenses going to do with Bush and Davis in the same backfield, along with AJ and Moulds outside?
...if????????? What about are pass rusher needs? We are at 'zilch' there.
tsip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2006   #19
4Texans
Hall of Fame
 
4Texans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,054
Rep Power: 46 4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected4Texans is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsip
...if????????? What about are pass rusher needs? We are at 'zilch' there.
We only have one #1 pick. Great DE's came around every other year or so. Guy's like Bush have the potential to be a player that comes along every 10 years maybe.. We signed Weaver which is hopefully an upgrade. We'll have to address pass rusher in the later rounds, FA, or trade. Of course it would be nice if someone presently on the team steps up in the new system.
__________________
Born and raised a Texan... How 'bout you?
4Texans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2006   #20
threetoedpete
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Age: 59
Posts: 6,644
Rep Power: 142 threetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respectedthreetoedpete is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarg01
My personal rule is that your first rounder has to start by the midpoint of the season (except franchise QBs). 2nd rounders have to start by their 2nd year. 3rd rounders have to start by the 3rd year. Second-day picks are backups.

It's sort of a midpoint between BPA and need.
I'm kinda of like this but different. You never pass up a franchise quarterback.

A first rounder should be in the running for the probowl every year. 2nd rounder should be a starter and respected around the league as a blue chip player. 3rd rounder should have a 60 % chance of sticking on the team and be a substaintial contributer with in two years. 4th rounder, 50 % chance of making the team . 5th rounder 40 % chance of sticking on the roaster out of summer camp. You hit anything after the fourth round, give the scouts a bump. Also, each position is weighted. DE's are worth more than OLB's. Corners are worth more than safteis. OLT's are worth far more than the other offensive line postions. You're right about Bush, and let the record show, everyone in the national media has crownded him a can't miss super star. We're two deep at starting running backs, currently. When we draft prince reggie we'lll be three deep in starting RB's. He's projected to be such a major offensive power, they feel although there isn't a major need at running back,that RB creates such match up problems, he will elevate the overall play of the offense.
You can bet they will come away with a young MLB (who doesn't have to start right away), a corner who can play nickle/dime, and saftey in a pinich and a good prospect to shore up Peek & Babin at DE befor the draft is over. Those three postions are major needs for '06 season. Judging by the moves, someone believes that we're close to making a push for a wild card next season with Reggie. So after the second, they will look for the BPA for those three back up spots.

I have a different take, one that hasn't been expressed publicly on the Travis Johnson deal by the Texan's. And that is they targeted Derrick Johnson, got a deal to move down and still have a shot at Derrick Johnson and ended up having to take the BPA that filled a need after DJ went off the board. Travis Johnson will never be a pro-bowl player. At best he will be a jouneyman DT who will be a servicable player. In other words, he was drafted ten to twenty spots too soon. The star on that line at FSU at the DT position, Broderick Bunkley, will go about the same slot or higher this draft. It will be very interesting from here on out to compare the careers of the two. My book says Bunkley has the chance to be something very special.

Personally, and I have stated this since January, in Reggie Bush we're getting Freeman McNiel , not Gale Sayers, Tony Dorsette, ( pick your Icon). I think it is a mistake. But as stated earliy, everyone in the national media assures us that Bush is a lock for the HOF. We'll see. He's the BPA.

Last edited by threetoedpete; 04-28-2006 at 03:45 AM.
threetoedpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger