![]() |
|
|||||||
| College Football The future stars of the NFL |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 280
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
Qb: Carr
Fb: Cook/Norris Rb: Davis/Wells/Morencey Ol: Ferguson - Pitts- Flanagan - McKinney - Wade Te: Putzier/Bruener Wr: Johnson - Moulds - Mathis/Walter/Armstrong sounds like a good offense to me
__________________
Rule #7 - play like a champion!!! Last edited by baba ganoush; 04-04-2006 at 05:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
We haven't even worked out with D'Brick.
__________________
"I'm going to win the fans over." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Age: 57
Posts: 6,644
Rep Power: 141
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Everything looks good on your o-line except Mc. The main reason I want brick is it puts Mckinney on the pine. That is where he belongs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,210
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ferguson isn't about to be picked at #1 and doesn't deserve that high of a pick anyways. He is the best LT prospect in this draft, but I'd probably prefer Eric Winston or Winston Justice as they are more versatile and could play LT or RT, and neither would take as high of a pick for us. Either way, I don't see the Texans getting D'Brick at all, if they do get a great trade down offer they'll be targeting Mario Williams, and I expect the Texans to look for an OT at #33 or #65 but not in the 1st round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Age: 57
Posts: 6,644
Rep Power: 141
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin
Section: Bullpen/ 636
Age: 39
Posts: 5,165
Rep Power: 10996
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
If we were to make that pick, i think the line would look like this: Ferguson- McKinney- Flanagan- Weigert- Pitts Wade is going to be released and Weigert is our 2nd best OLman. I would he be benched? The most likely thing is for us to go into the season with Pitts, Wand, Weigert, and 2nd or 3rd round rookie competing for the two tackle spots. I think that after the dust settles, the '06 line will look like this: Pitts- McKinney- Flanagan- Weigert- Wand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hubcap Diamond
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,436
Rep Power: 6068
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Amy glances out the window; her hair, skin, and clothes take on a pronounced reddish tinge from Doppler effect as she drops out of the conversation at relativistic velocity. - Cryptonomicon Last edited by Runner; 04-04-2006 at 09:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 280
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
about the person above me...if hodgdon was to start, which i dont think is a bad idea because he was playing well when he got his chance. If we still took Ferguson and cut Wade i think our line could possible look like this...
LT: D'Brickashaw Ferguson (6'5" 305) LG: Chester Pitts (6'3" - 320) C: Drew Hodgdon (6'3" - 309) RG: Mike Flanagan (6'5" - 301) RT: Zach Weigert (6'5" - 309) You get your [b]TWO BEST[b]lineman on Carrs blindside, and you get two mammoth guy on the right side...and you have an average sived center, to me this looks like a good line.
__________________
Rule #7 - play like a champion!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hubcap Diamond
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,436
Rep Power: 6068
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I think if Pitts and McKinney are on our left side it is because they earn it in camp. The o-line positions are far from set at this point.
__________________
Amy glances out the window; her hair, skin, and clothes take on a pronounced reddish tinge from Doppler effect as she drops out of the conversation at relativistic velocity. - Cryptonomicon |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|