Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2006   #1
Dime
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 43
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 13 Dime is a Pro BowlerDime is a Pro Bowler
Default Sadness becomes a Texan when he looks at this board.

Ok.. Open myself up to more flaming, but this needs to be addressed.

I am so glad we have so little need. We only are having (mainly) discussions on Bush/Young, and most of you (not all) are forgetting about the positions of NEED! Oline (3-4 NEEDED players there, I have only heard 1 or 2 names on this board), WR (1-2 needs there), D-Line (1-3 Needs to be training replacement players), LB (1-2 Needs here), CB (1-2 Needs there)

I have heard AJ Hawk. The other players pretty much have fallen off everyones radar (except for a few of you). We have a bunch of need, what about we start discussing players who can fit the needs more here.

Ok... Im your Pinata
__________________
You can get more with a 2 by 4 and a kind word then just with a kind word.
Dime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #2
chuckm
Hall of Fame
 
chuckm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Spring
Age: 52
Posts: 1,896
Rep Power: 14 chuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dime
I have heard AJ Hawk. The other players pretty much have fallen off everyones radar (except for a few of you). We have a bunch of need, what about we start discussing players who can fit the needs more here.

Ok... Im your Pinata
not from me .... I'm there with you ... Hawk (or Ferguson) would look good in Steel Blue
__________________
Sabbatical: an extended period away from our daily routine to refresh our minds and spirits
chuckm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #3
MorKnolle
Hall of Fame
 
MorKnolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,210
Rep Power: 0 MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle
Default

My top choice in the whole draft would still be a trade down and Mario Williams with our first pick, then Eric Winston and Nick Mangold in the 2nd round, followed by the best CB/S and then WR/TE in the 3rd round.
MorKnolle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #4
Dime
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 43
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 13 Dime is a Pro BowlerDime is a Pro Bowler
Default

Excellent.. Finally getting somewhere.. My question is

Can third round Oline be viable enough to be starters? Or should he be keys in the second round?
__________________
You can get more with a 2 by 4 and a kind word then just with a kind word.
Dime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #5
chuckm
Hall of Fame
 
chuckm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Spring
Age: 52
Posts: 1,896
Rep Power: 14 chuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVP
Default

I sure hope that careful consideration is given to a TE in the 2nd round .... having that guy in the middle forgives sooooo many sins on 3rd down* and in the red zone ....

* see Jay Novachek
__________________
Sabbatical: an extended period away from our daily routine to refresh our minds and spirits
chuckm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #6
Runner
Hubcap Diamond
 
Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,700
Rep Power: 25614 Runner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I want a guaranteed impact o-lineman - like Orlando Pace or Tony Mandarich.

Seriously, the draft evaluation is hard work and anyone who claims to know "the" answer is fooling himself. No college player is guaranteed a successful NFL career, much less the Hall of Fame as seems to be implied here frequently.

I don't know what to do - I like Bush's potential upside given the assumed new offensive system, but trading down helps reduce the risk/cost impact of the draft. I also think it is easier for defensive players to make an immediate impact and fill a need.

So my suggestion? I'm still not sure, but I thought I'd throw out that food for thought.
__________________
Amy glances out the window; her hair, skin, and clothes take on a pronounced reddish tinge from Doppler effect as she drops out of the conversation at relativistic velocity. - Cryptonomicon
Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #7
Big B Texan Fan
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spring TX
Age: 40
Posts: 1,098
Rep Power: 0 Big B Texan Fan has been demoted to the practice squad
Default

When you suck as badly as we did, you don't have the luxary of filling needs with either our #1 overall or even our 2nd rd'r. It's BPA all the way, at least in the first day. If you have a player rated slightly below another player who would fill a need then maybe you pick that need player, maybe.

We did not screw this up over 1 weekend so we're definately not gonna fix in 1 weekend (the draft). This takes time. Needs get filled in FA and in the 3rd - 7th round of the draft for us sucky teams and the teams that are a plyer or two away can go need in the 1st round as well as package up the later pix to move up in the 2nd to fill another need (sounds familiar don't it, and we weren't a player or two away either). I still say we take BPA in the 3rd, at least one of them.
__________________
Kubiak is no mechanic!
Trade in the Carr and go with a Young-er model!
Big B Texan Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 02-06-2006   #8
zeplin
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 9 zeplin is ridin' the pine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dime
Ok.. Open myself up to more flaming, but this needs to be addressed.

I am so glad we have so little need. We only are having (mainly) discussions on Bush/Young, and most of you (not all) are forgetting about the positions of NEED! Oline (3-4 NEEDED players there, I have only heard 1 or 2 names on this board), WR (1-2 needs there), D-Line (1-3 Needs to be training replacement players), LB (1-2 Needs here), CB (1-2 Needs there)

I have heard AJ Hawk. The other players pretty much have fallen off everyones radar (except for a few of you). We have a bunch of need, what about we start discussing players who can fit the needs more here.

Ok... Im your Pinata
Check out my posts I have preached this same line. I have been beat on for my trade down opinion. Dbrickshaw fergusan is the OL I would work to aquire. Hawk looks good too." Keep on preaching"

Amen
__________________
The Mob Rules
zeplin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #9
Sarg01
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 13 Sarg01 is a Pro BowlerSarg01 is a Pro Bowler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dime
Excellent.. Finally getting somewhere.. My question is

Can third round Oline be viable enough to be starters? Or should he be keys in the second round?
It's possible, since we have the top picks in Round 3 and this year has SO many good O-line players.

Eric Winston (due to injury status) is often projected in the early 3rd - some scouts discount the injury and project him in the 1st. Davin Joseph usually gets late 2nd status. Nick Mangold is often projected in the early 3rd.

Brick
Justice
Winston
McNeil
Jean-Giles
Scott
Colledge
Joseph
Trueblood
Whitworth
Mangold
Eslinger
Lutui

That's 13 guys who have O-line upgrade written all over them. Will one of them be available at pick #65? I'd make that bet. I'd even go for 2 (and we have pick #66 as well).
Sarg01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #10
TEXANRED
Texan-American
 
TEXANRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 7,121
Rep Power: 44358 TEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respectedTEXANRED is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

My opinion is we sign either Alexander or Edge (both from what I heard are not going to be returning) trade DD for a second round pick and then trade down, get extra picks and pick up D-brick or Hawk.
TEXANRED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #11
HoustonFrog
Chitown Frog
 
HoustonFrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 12,418
Rep Power: 32311 HoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respectedHoustonFrog is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorKnolle
My top choice in the whole draft would still be a trade down and Mario Williams with our first pick, then Eric Winston and Nick Mangold in the 2nd round, followed by the best CB/S and then WR/TE in the 3rd round.
My first choice was always Bush followed by O-line, TE and D line with the next three picks. Maybe even another O-lineman..depends on the TE. I love VY but I think they are keeping Carr. Not a big fan of that either but you can only fill so many holes. After seeing Pitt in the playoffs and some other teams I wouldn't mind moving down for D though. I posted on the draft board a few weeks back about Hawk being a guy who I think is a can't miss because of his motor. I like Williams too. I think the draft is deep enough that you can get the O-line, TE and even safety with the rest of those top picks.
HoustonFrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #12
WILLIEG
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 37
Posts: 282
Rep Power: 10 WILLIEG is ridin' the pine
Default

The O-line is very deep in the draft and I'm guessing that is why most MB's continue with the whole Bush/Young/D'brich thing. Many people believe that if we take either Young/Bush we would still be able to get a really good OT. I believe that since the draft is so stacked with alot of positions except for LB's. We might not be able to draft on the defensive side of the ball until next year. Remeber that this is another process that isn't going to be an over the night fix and I suppose we will try to make the best of who we have on the defensive side of the ball until we get a better feeling of what the new 4-3 to 3-4 hybrid is going to look like. I say we stay focused on the offensive side of the ball game this year and plug in the needs on defense next year. Every year there is a player like none other and it is easdy to get caught up in all the hoopla of every expert that has an opinion. Next year there's a kid by the name of Gaines Adams that is supose to be bettter than M. Willams that will be comiong out to the NFL. And don't forget about the kid from Penn Sate that's suppose to be better that A.J. Hawk. You see ther is always somome who is suppose to be better than the one before. we need to stay focused and attend to one problem at a time to make sure that whoever we pick on one side of the ball game is the very best pickup possible.
WILLIEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #13
Grid
Hall of Fame
 
Grid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2272 Grid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

on late round Oline rookies being starters.


Ive come to the conclusion that we are gonna need to groom Olinemen no matter what. If we used one of our first two picks on an Olineman, yah..he might be able to start for us.. but I dont see a rookie coming in and turning things around for us in his first year... not on the Oline... not just one man.

So..with that in mind... that means that we are gonna HAVE to get our current Oline to work better this offseason.. either through better coaching or FA acquisitions.. and in the draft..we need to use LATE ROUND picks on Olinemen and start grooming them to be starters by 2007..2008 at the latest. Id like to see us pick up alot of Olinemen...but id like all of them to be grabbed on the second day..and as undrafted free agents. (maybe one Olineman first day if its good value)
Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #14
Texans Horror
Hall of Fame
 
Texans Horror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 2,303
Rep Power: 25 Texans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of FamerTexans Horror is a Hall of Famer
Default

If we are five to six players away from being a play-off contending team, which McNair has claimed, then who are those players?

I think it is a playmaker, two offensive linemen, a tight end, a linebacker, corner, and maybe safety.

With the draft as deep as it is, I think we can really exploit it this year. First round - playmaker (RB), second round - TE and lineman, third round - ???. Who are the top corners/linebackers/safeties? Cause we can only get two.

I think it is key to this team that we pick up one to two people in free agency. A lineman and somebody on defense.
Texans Horror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #15
MorKnolle
Hall of Fame
 
MorKnolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,210
Rep Power: 0 MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grid
on late round Oline rookies being starters.


Ive come to the conclusion that we are gonna need to groom Olinemen no matter what. If we used one of our first two picks on an Olineman, yah..he might be able to start for us.. but I dont see a rookie coming in and turning things around for us in his first year... not on the Oline... not just one man.

So..with that in mind... that means that we are gonna HAVE to get our current Oline to work better this offseason.. either through better coaching or FA acquisitions.. and in the draft..we need to use LATE ROUND picks on Olinemen and start grooming them to be starters by 2007..2008 at the latest. Id like to see us pick up alot of Olinemen...but id like all of them to be grabbed on the second day..and as undrafted free agents. (maybe one Olineman first day if its good value)
A lot of improving the OLine will be in coaching and in our offensive system, but at the same time there are certain talent limitations that every player has, and most of the guys on our OLine that limit is pretty low, as it is with most of the guys that will end up going in the later rounds. Sure they should hopefully improve with our new coaches and system, but still you need to get some guys in there too that have the potential to be great, we've ignored our OLine problems long enough and tried to satisfy them with later round picks and free agents, and at some point we need to get a couple of them in the higher rounds, and with this year being a great year for OLine talent I think this is the year we have to look at that. I think the rest of our offense is close to being a very good offense, and if we could finally fix up our OLine then that could put our offense into the top 10 in the league in a year. I don't expect our whole offense to suddenly be fixed week 1 of 2006, but at some point you have to start fixing it and let the young talent grow and get better, and if you can draft some guys that already have good talent and have the potential to be very good OLinemen, and when adding them could/should help propel our offense to a top 10 offense in a year or two then I say you have to look to fix that this year. Adding a ton of depth of free agents (who are undrafted/unsigned for a reason) and lower round quality players won't do much other than fill our roster with more junky players and hope that five out of them will emerge as decent players, or you could draft a couple of the top guys and let them anchor your OLine for a decade.
MorKnolle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #16
MorKnolle
Hall of Fame
 
MorKnolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,210
Rep Power: 0 MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle MorKnolle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oso
If we are five to six players away from being a play-off contending team, which McNair has claimed, then who are those players?

I think it is a playmaker, two offensive linemen, a tight end, a linebacker, corner, and maybe safety.

With the draft as deep as it is, I think we can really exploit it this year. First round - playmaker (RB), second round - TE and lineman, third round - ???. Who are the top corners/linebackers/safeties? Cause we can only get two.

I think it is key to this team that we pick up one to two people in free agency. A lineman and somebody on defense.
Add DE to that since we are transitioning to a 4-3. Adding a good passrushing DE, upgrading the LB core (mainly need a MLB), upgrading at one CB and a coverage S should improve the defense drastically.
2-3 OLinemen (one OT and two interior, maybe even all three interior since Wiegert is getting old) would go a long way towards fixing up our offense. A pass catching TE would be a valuable addition, and then another playmaker, whether it be a faster RB or a better/fast WR, or a combination of those two (maybe Reggie Bush?), and our offense should be looking great, although I think our offense can still be successful without having to add that "home run" threat guy, just not as successful as it would be with a guy like Bush in there, but to me OLine is the most important thing to get fixed up.
MorKnolle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #17
Runner
Hubcap Diamond
 
Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,700
Rep Power: 25614 Runner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respectedRunner is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorKnolle
Sure they should hopefully improve with our new coaches and system, but still you need to get some guys in there too that have the potential to be great, we've ignored our OLine problems long enough and tried to satisfy them with later round picks and free agents, and at some point we need to get a couple of them in the higher rounds, and with this year being a great year for OLine talent I think this is the year we have to look at that.
I've posted elsewhere on this board that I think a good, doable o-line scenario is picking up Bentley as a free agent to solidify the middle of the line and drafting a guard and a tackle for depth/grooming (1 second, 1 third round?). That leaves still leaves good picks for other need ares.
__________________
Amy glances out the window; her hair, skin, and clothes take on a pronounced reddish tinge from Doppler effect as she drops out of the conversation at relativistic velocity. - Cryptonomicon
Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #18
Dime
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 43
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 13 Dime is a Pro BowlerDime is a Pro Bowler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorKnolle
Add DE to that since we are transitioning to a 4-3. Adding a good passrushing DE, upgrading the LB core (mainly need a MLB), upgrading at one CB and a coverage S should improve the defense drastically.
2-3 OLinemen (one OT and two interior, maybe even all three interior since Wiegert is getting old) would go a long way towards fixing up our offense. A pass catching TE would be a valuable addition, and then another playmaker, whether it be a faster RB or a better/fast WR, or a combination of those two (maybe Reggie Bush?), and our offense should be looking great, although I think our offense can still be successful without having to add that "home run" threat guy, just not as successful as it would be with a guy like Bush in there, but to me OLine is the most important thing to get fixed up.
Is it in stone that we are doing the 4 - 3?
__________________
You can get more with a 2 by 4 and a kind word then just with a kind word.
Dime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #19
run-david-run
Hall of Fame
 
run-david-run's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The University of Texas
Age: 25
Posts: 3,370
Rep Power: 1330 run-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respectedrun-david-run is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via AIM to run-david-run
Default

It has been said we wil rotate somewhat between 3-4 and 4-3, but for the most part it will be 4-3. This was said by Kubiak.
__________________
Andre Johnson is The Answer
run-david-run is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006   #20
sprtsfanatic
All Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 634
Rep Power: 11 sprtsfanatic is ridin' the pine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dime
Is it in stone that we are doing the 4 - 3?
Pretty much but since we do not have the personnel to play the 4-3, we will be using a hybrid until we can implement the 4-3 with the right people.
sprtsfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger