![]() |
|
|||||||
| Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Go Texans!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 17,747
Rep Power: 50138
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ESPN Insider is claiming Jim Bates is 99% NOT coming here, and it was Kubiak who decided against it. I have copied and pasted the text for you below:
Bates willing to sit out: The weekend didn't do any more to convince Jim Bates, the recently departed Packers defensive coordinator, to take the Bills' defensive coordinator job. So Bills coach Dick Jauron will probably have to go in a different direction. Bates is frustrated. The head coaching job in Green Bay went to Mike McCarthy, and Bates thought he had a good offer to be the Texans' defensive coordinator, but Gary Kubiak decided to go in a different direction. The Bills' offer wasn't great, so Bates is willing to sit out two years -- the Packers would pay his salary -- until he finds something that interests him. Hopefully this will stop the countless "...I hope Bates is still an option..." replies that I am reading. Bates is history. Not a candidate anymore. Bates was the top candidate and something happened along the way that radically changed Kubiak's mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 719
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
I am not sure how true this is but I have heard reports that Bates wanted full control for hiring all the defensive position coaches and this is why Kubes backed off. If true, this makes sense and I can understand why Kubes did not OK this. It would be difficult for a HC to give an assistant that much control.
__________________
Schaub to Johnson; Rock N' Roll - Touchdown Houston |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 60
Posts: 790
Rep Power: 10
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 719
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,041
Rep Power: 45
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If Sherman does end up with the Texans, maybe something will work out with Bates. There's no telling these days...........
__________________
Born and raised a Texan... How 'bout you? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall of Fame
|
I think its good that we didnt give Bates all the control he wanted. Remeber, Bates is, much like Fangio, a very passive cover 2 man. Not necesseraly the route I want my team taking. Yes he is consitently ranked near the top in terms of D, but taking this much power away from a rookie HC is dangerous. Many people point to DC, but Greg Williams was established with the current team beofre Gibbs came back, there is also no doubting Gibbs reputation. All in all, as long as we find someone capable of running the D the way Kubes want, Im all for it.
__________________
Andre Johnson is The Answer |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
All Pro
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The 'No, CA
Age: 30
Posts: 919
Rep Power: 9
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
The Lord is my refuge and strength, an ever present help in trouble. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|