Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft The future stars of the NFL

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2006   #1
Texans_Chick
Utopian Dreamer
 
Texans_Chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,248
Rep Power: 74671 Texans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respectedTexans_Chick is a quality contributor and well respected
Default A Question for Trading Down Advocates.

For those people who are hoping for the Texans to trade down, I would like your opinion on a particular post that came from an old thread about the Texans trading down option, and wasn't really discussed much:

Last week thread: Trade down IS only option.

AJ said:

Quote:
There's also a lot of talk in this thread about trading down and picking up several more draft picks. The Texans already have eight picks and there's this thing called the rookie pool that you can't exceed for purposes of the salary cap, plus the fact that you can only prorate new contracts 4 years now since there's no CBA extension. This means that rookie contracts have to be loaded up more and more in their second year because their first year base salaries are set and you can't prorate bonus out five or six years any more. Meaning, if you load up on low first rounders and second or even third rounders you can get yourself in a pickle pretty quickly salary cap wise by taking on too many of these higher round rookie contracts.
Please refrain from gratitous displays of dumping on VY or Bush as it doesn't promote helpful discussion (and I have to say it is a bit unseemly when a collection of sittin down, computer staring donut eaters spend their time cracking on elite athletes ). In other words, let's work from the assumption that you don't want to pick VY or Bush for whatever reasons, what is your commentary about AJ's post? That you just like the other players better and want actual players v. just more picks? I want to see your thinking.

Apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere in depth but I didn't see much comment about this either here or in the media.

TIA.
Texans_Chick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #2
Kaiser Toro
Native Mod
 
Kaiser Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Straight Outta Austin
Age: 44
Posts: 16,059
Rep Power: 41444 Kaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I am sure I know the answer but my first question would be does the lack of the CBA extension effect Free Agent acquisitions as well? If it is yes or no that would help shape the discussion due to the convergence of these acquisiton levers.
__________________
Smell the glove is here
Kaiser Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #3
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 46,306
Rep Power: 331516 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Yes, the lack of a CBA limits what can be done on any new contract.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #4
chuckm
Hall of Fame
 
chuckm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Spring
Age: 53
Posts: 1,896
Rep Power: 14 chuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVPchuckm was voted MVP
Default

I have another thought ... however unlikely but here it is ....

Texans trade with NYJ and get a package of picks including #4, .....

Draft day rolls around .....

NYJ picks Reggie Bush
NO picks Matt Leinhart
Tenn picks D'Brickashaw Ferguson

what then?

trade even farther down?
pick Young?
pick someone else?
__________________
Sabbatical: an extended period away from our daily routine to refresh our minds and spirits
chuckm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #5
tulexan
Hall of Fame
 
tulexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 30
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 28 tulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famertulexan is a Hall of Famer
Default

Pick Jay Cutler
tulexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #6
Grid
Hall of Fame
 
Grid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2272 Grid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

well one answer is that there is a "fairly" good chance that the league might have this issue fixed before the draft.

If they dont though.. alot of trade down scenarios involve one or two extra picks this year, and one or two extra picks next year.. which would not be a crippling amount of rookies, i would think.

Other scenarios involve us trading down, then trading back up... so we end up with around the same amount of players, but have alot of 1st round graded players. (such as the scenario where we trade down to #4 and get a 2nd and 3rd rounder.. then use our 3 3rds to trade back up into the top of the second.. giving us 3 picks where we can grab the players that slide out of the first)


Its hard to say what would and wouldnt work without having some real numbers laid out in front of you.
Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #7
Grid
Hall of Fame
 
Grid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,299
Rep Power: 2272 Grid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respectedGrid is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckm
I have another thought ... however unlikely but here it is ....

Texans trade with NYJ and get a package of picks including #4, .....

Draft day rolls around .....

NYJ picks Reggie Bush
NO picks Matt Leinhart
Tenn picks D'Brickashaw Ferguson

what then?

trade even farther down?
pick Young?
pick someone else?
Mario Williams
Grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 01-25-2006   #8
Kaiser Toro
Native Mod
 
Kaiser Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Straight Outta Austin
Age: 44
Posts: 16,059
Rep Power: 41444 Kaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

The other hiccup in this exercise is DC and who will be released in March. I do not want to poo poo on the thread as I think it is the kind that we need around here, but there are many dominos to fall before I throw out my uneducated guess.
__________________
Smell the glove is here
Kaiser Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #9
BuffSoldier
Hall of Fame
 
BuffSoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tha South Side of Screwston, Texas
Age: 26
Posts: 1,929
Rep Power: 12 BuffSoldier is ridin' the pine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckm
I have another thought ... however unlikely but here it is ....

Texans trade with NYJ and get a package of picks including #4, .....

Draft day rolls around .....

NYJ picks Reggie Bush
NO picks Matt Leinhart
Tenn picks D'Brickashaw Ferguson

what then?

trade even farther down?
pick Young?
pick someone else?
Pick Mario Williams or AJ Hawk.

Oh, and for the post topic. If the Texans were to trade down they would pick up one possibly 2 picks this year. Each team is supposed to have 7 picks we have 8 so at most we would have 10 picks only 3 over what we would regularly have. Some of these picks may be used to trade up again, especially if we end up with another 3rd rounder. The other pick we would acuire would be for next years first round and we would have to worry about that in 2007.

Worst case scenario, we are not able to sign our 6th, 7th and maybe 5th rounder which we may not have signed anyway.

Oh and by drafting Bush his salary would put us high into cap space in his second year when e already signed an extension with DD.
__________________
Pressure bust a pipe.
BuffSoldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #10
TheOgre
Hall of Fame
 
TheOgre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Back in the cellar again
Posts: 3,739
Rep Power: 17 TheOgre was voted MVPTheOgre was voted MVPTheOgre was voted MVPTheOgre was voted MVP
Default

There are a few ways to attempt to correct this. The problem is, though, if you continue to stockpile picks and finish in the bottom 10 in the league, you are going to run into cap problems.

In my example on page 4 of that same thread in which AJ posted, I had us trading the Jets for their 1st this year, 1st next year, and John Abraham. In this example, we would actually use less of the rookie cap than was alocated because we went from having the 1st overall pick to the 4th without acquiring a 2006 pick. Adding a veteran in the mix helps with the rookie cap, but it does still potentially cause other cap concerns.

Lets say that instead, we got the Jets 1st-3rd round selections this year plus a 2nd next year. This would creating some issues. The easiest solution would be to trade a pick for a future pick, if you can find a taker. Perhaps trade one of our 3rd's for a 2007 2nd. You could trade for veterans. You could also package multiple picks to trade back up (Babin style). These are ways to try to counteract it. The rookie cap issues will be easier to handle when we start to finish in the top half of the league (and are drafting later).
__________________
"...the Texans select...Adrian Peterson, RB, University of Oklahoma."
TheOgre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #11
Errant Hothy
Hypermediocrity
 
Errant Hothy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keller, Tx
Age: 36
Posts: 9,960
Rep Power: 34025 Errant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respectedErrant Hothy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

IF we were to trade down I’d like an extra a second or third this year(one or the other no more), and everything else I’d ask for in trades would be picks for next year. I’ve been a hardcore draftnik for about the last 5 years and in that time one team has worked the draft better then anyone, The Patriots. While their picks have not all been great, some have stunk, they have always had the flexibility, due to extra picks, to make the moves to get the players they wanted.

Also this year’s draft is deep in spots that are needs for use, mainly Offensive Line and Tight End; and if we need to make moves to get the players we want/need I’m pretty sure Cass can get everybody signed (say what you like about Charlie he has been pretty savvy signing rookies). Besides trading out of the #1 spot, I wouldn’t mind trading the first pick in the 4th, which historically has had some value, for another 3rd next year; once again giving us the flexibility to draft the players we really wanted next year or to trade picks for players of even more picks in 2008.

I think looking as each draft as in independent and whole contained entity is what has lead some teams to the poor drafts they have had; where as teams who willing to look not only at this draft and how it will effect the team but also who you can improve next years draft have had better success. No NFL team can be rebuilt in a single draft (except the post-Walker trade Cowboys), but by working the draft with an eye to the next draft tends to lead to a more stable talent base. Granted this can all back fire as any team needs to have a solid draft each year to help re-supply the depth chart, but the system can be worked.

As for the CBA, I'd be shocked if this lead to an NHL/MLB type secnario. The NFL has shown to much intellegnce in dealing with their CBA.
Errant Hothy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #12
Glacier
Veteran
 
Glacier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 227
Rep Power: 0 Glacier is ridin' the pine
Default

Something interesting that I have noticed is how people seem to think, just because you have X amount of draft picks, your X=Y where Y is number of players taken.

Sometimes having lots of draft picks is a powerful tool for bundling picks to move up or to trade for more picks in subsequent years.


Hypotheical situation:

Texans trade down and end up with 2 #1 picks next year. For arguments sake, lets pretend that Kubiak comes in and David Carr blows up under his watch OR <insert your new QB savior's name here> is drafted this year, Carr is traded for anyone else other than Ricky Williams.

Next year Adrian Peterson comes out after winning the heisman and is projected to go #1.

The texans, with 2 #1 picks in the first round and possibly an extra 2nd round pick from the prior years deal now bundle their picks to move up and pick #1 over all again.....

Just cause you have 10 picks doesn't mean you have to take 10 players, is all I'm saying; BUT, picks are like money, baby....you can't have enough.
Glacier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #13
ArlingtonTexan
Moderator
 
ArlingtonTexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 6,040
Rep Power: 73193 ArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

A couple of general things:

Overall, a good portion draftniks love the trade down. If you were to review the draft posts over history fans always want to trade down for more picks. Something some people's nature more = better.

Drafts are the means to the ends of getting players. If you are able to move around (both up and down) to get quality players w/o overpaying then fine, but staying at your position and doing a better at evaluating talent is underrated by a large portion of the draftniks.

The concern of the cap should not be so much for the rookie cap, but for the long term cap. A team's rookie cap is based on the position and number of picks that they have. I don't know the formula and quite frankly don't really care for the details. The way the NFL cap and draft are set up if you have too many high draft choices over time you will eventually have cap issues. 3 top 5 picks in 5 years is heading towards those issues. I am more worried about that long-term than too many picks piling up this year from a trade down.
ArlingtonTexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #14
thunderkyss 
&amp; so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 34,410
Rep Power: 244045 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans_Chick


(and I have to say it is a bit unseemly when a collection of sittin down, computer staring donut eaters spend their time cracking on elite athletes ).
Hey!!!!! I resemble that remark

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans_Chick
That you just like the other players better and want actual players v. just more picks? I want to see your thinking.
Apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere in depth but I didn't see much comment about this either here or in the media.
TIA.

We'll, only the first rounders are quaranteed contracts. The rest of them can and might not make it...
__________________
thunderkyss is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #15
beerlover
Site Contributor
 
beerlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 12,402
Rep Power: 55882 beerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respectedbeerlover is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

1st. we can absorb the #1 pick, if it means releasing Carr (Vince Young) that relieves more cap space.

2nd. The Texans have traded up and traded out (Babin & PBuc) the last two drafts resulting in a defiect of rookie prospects X 6 which means we should have more cap flexiabilty now.

3rd. What are we waiting for when it comes to helping build this team with young talent? Is Casserly afraid of his own picking abilites or has it been just fiscal cap management that has over ruled addressing obvious needs?

For me the time to act is now, the Texans fans should not suffer such a brutel season because of cap management in year 4 or failing to draft/trade/ or utilize talent because of coaching/schemes.

Trading down could work, but as chuckm states what if D'Brick is gone? If this happens I'd go defense with AJ Hawk, change to a 4-3 defense & have two seconds + three thirds + John Abraham. we could address tackle OT/DE in the 2nd, another Guard/Center with a CB/Safety in the 3rd. This would be a make-up call for two years of ignoring these positions for the last two years.
beerlover is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #16
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 46,306
Rep Power: 331516 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerlover
2nd. The Texans have traded up and traded out (Babin & PBuc) the last two drafts resulting in a defiect of rookie prospects X 6 which means we should have more cap flexiabilty now.
Very good point. As the expiration of the CBA has been drawing closer, the length of contracts has been shortening as well. Due to the Babin and P-Buc picks/trades, the Texans have less folks who will be hitting contract renewal than they otherwise might giving some ease to the scenario aj has correctly pointed out.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #17
Kaiser Toro
Native Mod
 
Kaiser Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Straight Outta Austin
Age: 44
Posts: 16,059
Rep Power: 41444 Kaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respectedKaiser Toro is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I understand the proration issue with the CBA. Can someone provide information or speak to more detail on the rookie pool?
__________________
Smell the glove is here
Kaiser Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #18
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 46,306
Rep Power: 331516 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiser Toro
I understand the proration issue with the CBA. Can someone provide information or speak to more detail on the rookie pool?
Not fully, but as a very lame stab--the NFL assigns a pool amount to every pick and then adds up the pool amounts for the picks a team had and allocates a rookie pool to each team. It is the maximum cap hit for all the rookies combined in their rookie year--teams do not have to stick to individual pool amounts, just to the overall rookie total. It does come from the general cap so room does need to be reserved for it. I have not heard of any issue with it for any team other than not having room under their general cap amount to fit their rookie pool amount in--i.e. it makes it difficult for them to agree to contracts with their rookies because they can't fit them all under the cap. That shouldn't be a problem for the Texans this year.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #19
ArlingtonTexan
Moderator
 
ArlingtonTexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 6,040
Rep Power: 73193 ArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak
Very good point. As the expiration of the CBA has been drawing closer, the length of contracts has been shortening as well. Due to the Babin and P-Buc picks/trades, the Texans have less folks who will be hitting contract renewal than they otherwise might giving some ease to the scenario aj has correctly pointed out.
In relation to what they could have yes, but in realtion to what other teams have no. Both years The Texans used two first day picks totally four players and young veteran contract versus 6 (obviously dependant on trades) for other teams. IMO, not more an issue for us than any other team.
ArlingtonTexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006   #20
Maddict5
Hall of Fame
 
Maddict5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,477
Rep Power: 5500 Maddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respectedMaddict5 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

also if we used the no.1 pick-there wouldnt be much difference in the amount we have to spend in the 2nd year as 2 or 3 lower picks wouldnt cost more than the huge contract we'd have to give a reggie bush/vince young @ no.1 overall so i dont see it as a problem
Maddict5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger