![]() |
|
|||||||
| College Football The future stars of the NFL |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 256
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
What do we do with it? I think drafting #2 this year is the absolute WORST draft position you could have. You won't be able to trade the pick for enough value (as you would with the Reggie Bush auction at #1), you don't need Leinert, and I don't think an OL is worth a 2nd overall pick. Wow, the Texans just keep making it harder and harder on themselves....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
All Pro
|
Well first of all Bush will be gone to SF at #1.
Then teams who might be looking at Leinhart are Det, Balt, and NYJ Balt will prob pick around 9-12 Det will pick around 6-10 Jets top 4 We can still get a good trade value for this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
who says that we have the #2 pick? right now we are still leading in strength of schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
You think we will lose to SF dont make me laugh b4 Reeves i would say yes... but players are playing for their jobs now |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yeah and we have a weaker strength of schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
1. Philadelphia (5-8) 0.141 2. San Francisco (2-11) 0.140 3. Houston (1-12) 0.130 4. Baltimore (4-9) 0.123 5. Oakland (4-9) 0.097 http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakers TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION MEETING If two or more clubs are tied in the selection order, the strength-of-schedule tie breaker is applied, subject to the following exceptions for playoff clubs: Last edited by royce1054; 12-18-2005 at 04:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
what are those numbers?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
where did you get those numbers?
the nfl has our strength of schedule at .567 and the niners at .585 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
I posted the link back up there above the #'s... let me see the NFL link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That guy has his own rankings of teams. The NFL has us at .567 and the Niners at .585
http://www.nfl.com/standings/conference |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
All Pro
|
Well that would mean going by
what the NFL said If two or more clubs are tied in the selection order, the strength-of-schedule tie breaker is applied, SF wont beat us. They are worse then we are. Plus anyways you said SF has .585 and we have a .567 they would pick 1st because the SoS is tougher than our is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall of Fame
|
No, weaker sos gets the 1st pick
__________________
What did the city of Houston do to anger the football gods? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Out yonder way...
Age: 41
Posts: 2,386
Rep Power: 15
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
SOS is the winning percentage of the oppoenents you've played. In other words,the higher the number, the stronger your schedule.
So if SF's is at .585 and Houston is at .567, then Houston has played the weaker schedule and would get priority over SF in the draft...as it stands right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
All Pro
|
Quote:
does it matter since we will beat SF anyways... This topic shouldnt even matter both team will go into the last game 2-13. The winner gets 2nd pick and loser 1st pick... bottom line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I wouldn't get your hopes up because of this game. If Kurt Warner played the entire game we would have been blown out by the Cardinals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 35
Posts: 1,186
Rep Power: 15
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
well considering our Our Poor qb play even againts terrible defenses i dont see how we wont look at Matt Leinert ive heard some scout say he could be every good as P. Manning but who knows we have david carr we dont need a qb since david is so good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Out yonder way...
Age: 41
Posts: 2,386
Rep Power: 15
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If my aunt had nuts...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: h-town
Age: 33
Posts: 733
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
Quote:
... I would laugh at you?
__________________
Go Team? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 5,080
Rep Power: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|