Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


The National Football League League News & Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2005   #1
Txn_in_FL
Lucky 13
 
Txn_in_FL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Age: 39
Posts: 3,826
Rep Power: 33753 Txn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Run & Shoot

First off, by no means am I in any way, shape or form suggesting installing this offense. What I am interested in is getting people take, an honest opinion on what they thought of it. The success of it really can't be denied and even after all the bad play-off appearances the Oilers were still taking it into the post season. They probably would have done so even if Pardee wasn't fired. I had already left the city prior to the firing and was just wondering if in that last season if it was a fall off in production or if it was just a usual snap judgment by Bud that made the firing inevitable. From what I see the offense is credible and productive. Why such the negativity?

I have been looking online and kind of trying to research it due to our current woes on offense. What I have found is that it is a system that takes sub-par talent and gives them the ability to produce.

Like I said, I'm not screaming to implement it, I just want opinions.

__________________
"I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite thread on Texans Talk."
Txn_in_FL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #2
texan279
Hall of Fame
 
texan279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rosenberg TX
Age: 35
Posts: 5,692
Rep Power: 13829 texan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexan279 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I have suggested using 4 WR sets more often with AJ, Gaffney, Armstrong, and Mathis, 2 burners and 2 sure handed guys. We tried it a couple of times 2 games ago but we ran out of that set. I say put the 4 WR's out there, put a RB in the backfield to help block, and put Carr in the gun. Have 2 of them run slant routes and the other 2 run deeper routes. What could it hurt to try anything at this point?
__________________
Fire It Up, Let the engines roll, It's time to burn it down
texan279 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #3
HardKnockTexan
All Pro
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 576
Rep Power: 28 HardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performerHardKnockTexan is a Legendary performer
Default

The problem with the run-n-shoot is that it limits your options. The Oilers went to a complete run-n-shoot offense leaving them with no fullback and no TE. The first few years it worked extremley well because we had a great team and it was an offense that most DC's hadnt seen before. It took exactly 2 seasons to learn how to stop the run-n-shoot. Tight zone coverage limits the options that the recievers had and this basically shut down the offense dramatically.

I'm all for the Texans using more 4 wide sets but it cant be done all the time because A.) Our offensive line doesnt hold blocks long enough and B.) We dont consistantly beat zone coverage for this to be effective on a regular basis.
__________________
Let the football gods smile down on us.
HardKnockTexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #4
Texas_Thrill
Hall of Fame
 
Texas_Thrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: H-Town stomping once again!
Age: 34
Posts: 1,473
Rep Power: 12 Texas_Thrill is on the Pro-Bowl ballotTexas_Thrill is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default

I dont think it gets u the same effect as being able to run run run run. playaction toucccchdown. That being said nobody takes our run or playaction seriously or anything else we do for that matter.
Texas_Thrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #5
edo783
Site Contributor
 
edo783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, again.
Posts: 7,708
Rep Power: 4641 edo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respectededo783 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

The problem with keeping a back into help block in a 4 wide set is that our backs (DD in particular) are not very good at blocking.
__________________


De Oppresso Liber
edo783 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #6
Double Barrel
Modified Simian
 
Double Barrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
Section: Gridiron, Tx
Age: 48
Posts: 31,774
Rep Power: 406301 Double Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

As a pure offense (meaning one where a team only uses it like the Oilers), it cannot control games.

Case in point is 35-3. Moon pretty much had a perfect first half, throwing four TD receptions. The second half should have seen the Oilers running, running, running to eat time off of the clock. Control the ball. Create 7-8 minute drives. But with no TE and FB on the roster, our running game was one dimensional.

[Of course, the defense playing prevent didn't help, either!]

As one of the options for an offensive unit, the R&S is alright (like the red gun - 3 WR / 1 TE). But it should just be another offensive formation that is in a team's bag of tricks, not the bread & butter.

As a pure offensive scheme, the NFL defenses figured it out a long time ago and it's glory days in professional football are long gone.

And I disagree with you that you can take subpar talent to make it work. The Oilers were successful because they had a great QB, sold OL, and a WR corps that could run great routes and make great plays. It also helped to have decent RBs that could make something out of nothing. (Look at the Lions during the same period, as they used the R&S, as well. But without the talent, they were mediocre at their height.)
__________________
"Football is only a diversion." ~ HOUSTON TEXANS
Double Barrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #7
eriadoc
Texan-American
 
eriadoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 18,644
Rep Power: 295319 eriadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via ICQ to eriadoc Send a message via Yahoo to eriadoc
Default

I think the Bills game proved two things - 1.) the Oilers were cursed, 2.) the R&S could have gotten them to the Super Bowl. That collapse was a simple case of turning off the intensity.

Like everything in this league, it got figured out and planned against. The fact that it's still being used, in parts, is a testament to how good it was during its time. If you have the right tools on offense, there's no real defense for it, but that's the case for WCO as well.
eriadoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 10-12-2005   #8
touttail
All Pro
 
touttail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baytown
Age: 59
Posts: 948
Rep Power: 11 touttail is ridin' the pine
Default

To me the run-and-shoot is more of a gimmick than a complete offense.

bobby 119C
touttail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #9
Texas_Thrill
Hall of Fame
 
Texas_Thrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: H-Town stomping once again!
Age: 34
Posts: 1,473
Rep Power: 12 Texas_Thrill is on the Pro-Bowl ballotTexas_Thrill is on the Pro-Bowl ballot
Default

What NFL offense run the R&S????

It is not a formation I want to see b/c it does not offer BALANCE. Look at the Eagles against the Cowboys.

And remember for as good as that R&S of the oilers was.....we were the visiting team so our season didn't go that well folks.
Texas_Thrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #10
eriadoc
Texan-American
 
eriadoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 18,644
Rep Power: 295319 eriadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respectederiadoc is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via ICQ to eriadoc Send a message via Yahoo to eriadoc
Default

Quote:
What NFL offense run the R&S????
When the Rams line up with Holt, Bruce, Curtis, and McDonald, and sometimes split Faulk (now Jackson) out wide, that's essentially R&S. No one does it full-time like the Oilers did, but elements of it live on in the NFL to this day.
eriadoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #11
ocd
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 10 ocd is ridin' the pine
Default

the run and shoot was an excellent offense. It was one deminsional (no running game) but scored the points and ran the heck out of their defenses.

The problem w/all the teams sited by vinny is that those teams sucked. Our team, the Oilers, had a very crappy defense. When we played against Elway and montana in the playoffs, it was our defense that gave up numerous big plays. And then there's the buffalo game...we had enough points in the first half to win the game but special teams and defense blew it.

Many can say the run and shoot was a joke but the reality was that the defense was a joke, always giving up huge plays. When a defense is giving the opponent the 3 and out treatment it just puts your offense back on the field. Our defense stayed on the field alot during playoff games. Our offense usually scored plenty of points to win handily.
ocd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #12
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 847
Rep Power: 35244 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny
There is a good reason nobody runs it full time....IT DOESNT WORK IN THE NFL, and Jack Pardee, June Jones, Jerry Glanville, and Mouse Davis proved it. If the league was more like baseball and you had equal possessions for every team it may be an awesome offense to install....but we don't use the innings system. That said...every team uses elements of it and most teams use multiple wr read-routes.
At the time, I felt the run & shoot as played by the Oilers lacked one ingredient to be truly sucessful - a big, strong single wing type quarterback who was capable of running the ball 15 times a game, making for a more balanced attack. These would be designed running plays, not scrambles. To address the obvious objection of the QB being more suseptible to injury, I would say that this is less likely when your intent is to run and you are anticipating the hit.

What is your opinion?
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #13
rmartin65
I'm Score
 
rmartin65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 24
Posts: 7,980
Rep Power: 64727 rmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respectedrmartin65 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

I like how the Eagles run their offense. They run some, then use a lot of screens, and throw deep a couple of times. Sure the halfbacks dont get as much rushing yards, but they recover by using screen yardage. And the Texans have all the components. A good, versatile back (DD), A QB that can move, and is kinda accurate (DC), and good WR's (AJ, Gaff, Mathis).
rmartin65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #14
Txn_in_FL
Lucky 13
 
Txn_in_FL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Age: 39
Posts: 3,826
Rep Power: 33753 Txn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

So, when you say the defense figured it out, do you mean containment or what? I am not someone who studies the game so if you start talking x's and o's I'm going to get lost. I am just going off of the production of the offense. Some of the stats that I have seen online:

1991 -Three N.F.L. (Detroit, Atlanta, Houston) teams make the playoffs with the Run and Shoot as their
offense
-The Detroit Lions reach the NFC Championship Game-Barry Sanders 1,000+ yard rusher
-The Houston Oilers have three receivers over 70 catches and nearly three with 1,000+ yards (1,181-
1,109-996)
-Warren Moon breaks N.F.L. record with 404 completions

1992 - Houston Oiler Lorenzo White, 1,000+ yard rusher

1993 -Houston Oiler Gary Brown rushes for 1,000+ yards in only 9 games

1995 - The Atlanta Falcons become the first team to have a 4,000+ yard passer (Jeff George), a 1,000+
yard rusher (Craig Heyward), and three 1,000+ yard receivers (Eric Metcalf, Terrance Mathis, and Bert
Emanuel)

I am going to research the stats more and some from previous years. Don't ask me why all of a sudden I have become interested in this, maybe it's because our offense has been so crappy.

Yeah, I know the last big numbers appear to be 10 years ago. SO what happened? Why the sudden animosity towards this offense. The run seems able to put up the numbers. Did the lack of ball control have that much of an effect on the "d"?

__________________
"I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite thread on Texans Talk."
Txn_in_FL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #15
ocd
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 10 ocd is ridin' the pine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny
Losing teams often have big passing stats...Stats are for baseball fans and fantasy football players. You have got to be able to drain the clock in the NFL....Big numbers won't make me change my mind on this issue...ive seen em.


yeah vinny, the big numbers you saw were our defense allowing big numbers put up against us. The teams you mentioned earlier all had poor defenses. When you score 30+ points in a game and then go on to lose that same game, it's the defense not the offensive scheme.
ocd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #16
ocd
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 10 ocd is ridin' the pine
Default

we're not talking about the texans...the oilers didn't make it a habit to go 3 and out under Pardee. The O line protected Moon and the receivers caught the majority of passes.
ocd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #17
Txn_in_FL
Lucky 13
 
Txn_in_FL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Age: 39
Posts: 3,826
Rep Power: 33753 Txn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respectedTxn_in_FL is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

But didn't the Oilers blow out Buffalo the week prior? I think that debacle up in Buffalo was a defensive failure, well, I don't think it, it was pretty damn obvious that was a defensive failure. They kept putting up points and the defense didn't adjust.
__________________
"I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite thread on Texans Talk."
Txn_in_FL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #18
ocd
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 10 ocd is ridin' the pine
Default

we were winning 35 to 3 at the half...if we did go 3 and out the rest of the game the defense still should've done it's job...the bills scored 38 points in the 2nd half...that's a defensive failure.

And getting back to your point about the rest of the league vinny, we are currently trying to do what the rest of the league seems to think of as normal, you know, the whole balanced offense with pass and run balance...how's that working out for us?
ocd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #19
mean mark8
Veteran
 
mean mark8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 49
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 10 mean mark8 is ridin' the pine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny
There is a good reason nobody runs it full time....IT DOESNT WORK IN THE NFL, and Jack Pardee, June Jones, Jerry Glanville, and Mouse Davis proved it. If the league was more like baseball and you had equal possessions for every team it may be an awesome offense to install....but we don't use the innings system. That said...every team uses elements of it and most teams use multiple wr read-routes.
I'm going totally nuts with this, but what about bringing Glanville back to Houston. The guy had a knack for turning deplorable teams into teams that believed in themselves. I think he has a Psych degree. We don't want him long-term because he can't get anyone to the big game but everywhere he went he turned the program into something that believed in itself and won. Ok, I'm done with my lunacy now.
mean mark8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #20
Nighthawk
All Pro
 
Nighthawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 719
Rep Power: 0 Nighthawk does not work well with others
Default Football gurus (real & imagined) hate it, fans love it

Every dime store football guru says it won't work, but when it failed with the Oilers it was the defense that failed, not the offense. There was a lot of criticism from armchair coaches and actual coaches, and it requires specific personnel to execute--a very good QB and quick and smart and sure-handed receivers, not to mention the O line. Now days everyone uses a little bit of it, of course, but it was pretty nifty when the Oilers ran a reasonable true version of it, and before them that other Texas team in that other league.

Could it work in the NFL? I'd say yes, if you had the D to go with it.
Nighthawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > The National Football League
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger