![]() |
|
|||||||
| Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
He sucks and hasn't done anything to secure #2 position in preseason. Runs crappy routes (not good in new offense), and only makes the occassional catch. Jerome could take his role. CB will be cut.
This offense will SUCK |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Age: 28
Posts: 997
Rep Power: 9
![]() |
Corey Bradford's what? Cut bradford's leg?
__________________
"If you're flammable and have legs you are never blocking a fire exit." - Mitch |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 253
Rep Power: 9
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I'm Score
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 23
Posts: 7,499
Rep Power: 20041
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
normally i dont like saying "cut this guy" but here i have to agree. jerome could fill the number 2 spot much better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,748
Rep Power: 6842
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
With the way Gaffney played last night he could go to #2, Armstrong to #3, Mathis #4, and Thomas #5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Age: 48
Posts: 253
Rep Power: 9
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I'm Score
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 23
Posts: 7,499
Rep Power: 20041
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i forgot about armstrong and gaffney...
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,748
Rep Power: 6842
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Our only hope right now. The one thing I say to myself all day is that Carr has not played with Gaffney in the game and yesterday he was without both him and Davis. That is all I keep saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Over here.
Age: 40
Posts: 10,475
Rep Power: 18004
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually, I think Morency has done better than Davis in Preseason, not that Morency's ready for #1 or anything. Maybe it's just because I haven't seen Davis as much, but I don't think having Davis in there would have helped Carr and the receivers--then again, there's the dump-offs as apposed to interceptions.
As far as Bradford goes, I don't want to see him as #2. I would like to see Gaffney as #2 (I think) and I definitely want to keep Mathis (future #2), Thomas (#2 right now?), and Swinton. I guess that leaves Armstrong and Bradford. AJ Gaffney Thomas Mathis Swinton Armstrong or Bradford? Last edited by HJam72; 09-02-2005 at 02:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall of Fame
|
Oh the Gaff love comes out. What a shock. This is the same board that trashes Gaff constantly. This is what Gaff has always been able to do, but he never see 5 balls in a game. Those go to Davis. Give Gaff the ball.
__________________
![]() 'Anyone ready to go outside so I can make you look bad?' - Matt Schaub talking to the DBs |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 8
![]() |
I don't see him going all the way from #2 to being waived, but I do agree that he should be the one to go. I was disappointed when they resigned him because I think he has some of the worst hands in the NFL.
I like Armstrong and Thomas way better than him.
__________________
Schaub to Johnson; Rock N' Roll - Touchdown Houston |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran
|
Armstrong showed me he deserves a spot with that end-zone catch. swinton has only shown promise in the return game but we already have other people that can do it just as well. i say bradford and swinton go, keep every one else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Over here.
Age: 40
Posts: 10,475
Rep Power: 18004
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
If you say Gaffney's that good, then I'm a little more sure about it now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 29
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
that CB should be cut is that he is not going to be good in this particular offense. He and Carr are not yet comfortable with each other as evidenced by the INT's in the preseason, and the various miscommunications between CB and DC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Jackass of Day!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 27
Posts: 9,474
Rep Power: 902
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the only thing ive ever bashed jabar gaffney for (and check my post history) is being a gator. i think that alone is worth being cut for, but thats just seminole pride talking
__________________
![]() Sig by Michaelm Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Over here.
Age: 40
Posts: 10,475
Rep Power: 18004
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,748
Rep Power: 6842
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I wouldn't be suprised to see Bradford get cut. Really I think we resigned him because we didn't know what kind of depth we have. Now that we saw Mathis make some good plays and Sloan makes some good plays, Bradford may be dispensable cuz really letting go of Bradford is like letting go a guy with Sloan Thomas' skills that will never get better. Sloan is going to get better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall of Fame
|
I beleive the WR List goes a little something like this - AJ,Gaffney,Thomas,Mathis,Swinton,Armstrong,Bradwho re
So its unanimous - CUT BRADFORD |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
I'm Score
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 23
Posts: 7,499
Rep Power: 20041
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
bradford has to go. put Mathis, Thomas or Gaff there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Over here.
Age: 40
Posts: 10,475
Rep Power: 18004
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It looks like we're all in agreement about something for a change.
No more Bradford at #2. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|