Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft > Mock Draft Talk
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


Mock Draft Talk Mock Drafts, group Mocks and links to all the shamockery.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2014   #1
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 827
Rep Power: 31527 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Here's my first attempt this draft season. What I'm going for here is an upgrade in speed and/or size. Also, heavily defensive because our current talent doesn't match up well with Crennel's 2-gap 34. I'm completely reworking our linebackers, with the exception of Cushing.

Cleveland wants Manziel. To get him they trade their 1-4, 1-26 and 2-35 for our 1-1.

#1a ( 1-4) OLB Anthony Barr, 6'-4", 248 lbs, 4.48 forty. Will line up at the weakside OLB position and finally give us double digit sacks from this position.

#1b ( 1-26) OLB Kyle Van Noy, 6'-3", 244 lbs, 4.65 forty. Will line up at the strongside OLB position. Has the skills and instincts in pass coverage this position requires to stay with TE's and backs. Solid run defender with a non-stop motor.

#2a (2-1) QB Jimmy Garoppolo, 6'-2", 225 lbs, 4.80 forty. Quick set up & release. Reads the field well, quick eyes, above average intelligence.

#2b (2-3) ILB Yawin Smallwood, 6'-3", 245 lbs, 4.68 forty. Underclassman who has moved up the charts since declaring. The number two rated ILB but maybe overdrafted by half a round because ILB's normally drop on draft day. More fluid than Skov and Borland, long arms and strong hands and strength to match his size. Plays fast downhill but has the skills to drop and cover. Impressive ability to rush the QB.

#3 (3-1) OT Ja'Wuan James, 6'-6", 315 lbs, 5.28 forty. Natural right tackle. Quickly recognizes stunts, initial quickness, lateral agility and flexibility, light on his feet, plays with his knees bent and has very good balance.

#4 (4-1) DE Josh Mauro, 6'-6", 276 lbs, 4.98 forty. Broad shouldered, long arms, impressive strength, plays with a non-stop motor.

#5a (5-1) NT Ryan Carrethers, 6'-1", 330 lbs, 5.25 forty. We finally get our big man in the middle. Former wrestler. Consistently moves centers off the ball, demands double teams, Sheds quickly, Uses his hands to swim and penetrate. Tough to control.

#5b (compensatory pick) CB Kendall James, 5'-11", 175 lbs, 4.38 forty. Small school player. Has the speed to stay with any receiver. Can handle press, man and zone. Solid in run support.

#5c (compensatory pick) FS/CB Marqueston Huff, 5'-11", 198 lbs, 4.40 forty. Blankets receivers, light feet, fluid hips.

#6 (6-1) RB Tyler Gaffney, 6'-0", 226 lbs, 4.57 forty. Excellent college production at Stanford.

#7a (7-1) TE Jordan Najvar, 6'-6", 262 lbs, 4.88 forty. Reliable hands, but is a blocking TE.

#7b (compensatory pick) KR/RB DeAnthony Thomas, 5'-9", 170 lbs, 4.34 forty. Electrifying player.
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014   #2
badboy
Site Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Clear Lake
Posts: 23,885
Rep Power: 183943 badboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Pretty interesting, would you care to say what happens to Mercilus and Reed? I was big fan of Huff but he didn't look good in the after season game. Just a thought but I'd go with a bigger DT to replace Smith. Not sure Brown will give up their second with the two firsts but maybe one or both of their thirds instead? I'm thinking Josh Gordon could be a part of their trade offer.
__________________
I want to be able to recognize the difference between a "want" and a "need" and then I want to be satisfied with getting a need
badboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014   #3
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 827
Rep Power: 31527 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by badboy View Post
Pretty interesting, would you care to say what happens to Mercilus and Reed? I was big fan of Huff but he didn't look good in the after season game. Just a thought but I'd go with a bigger DT to replace Smith. Not sure Brown will give up their second with the two firsts but maybe one or both of their thirds instead? I'm thinking Josh Gordon could be a part of their trade offer.
Reed will be fighting for a backup role, either inside or outside - if he makes the team. Mercilus was a hard decision. IMO he's an unknown. If I was convinced he could be dominating in our new defensive scheme, I'd have to completely rethink my draft. Barr would be. Perhaps Barr could move to SAM and open up 1b- maybe WR Allen Robinson - but I'd more likely go OL. But Mercilus does present a dilemma for me.

Mauro is my most unsatisfactory pick. Ed Stinson and Taylor Hart are two other players I'm looking at as being available in the mid-rounds. I'll see what comes out of the combine.

This is just my first go round and will surely evolve as we approach the draft.
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014   #4
badboy
Site Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Clear Lake
Posts: 23,885
Rep Power: 183943 badboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

really like Hart but I am going with Tuitt # 34.
__________________
I want to be able to recognize the difference between a "want" and a "need" and then I want to be satisfied with getting a need
badboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014   #5
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 827
Rep Power: 31527 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by badboy View Post
really like Hart but I am going with Tuitt # 34.
He should be an ideal fit in Crennel's defense - large DE who demands a double team. He has some quickness to go with his size.

The weakness in Crennel's defense is that teams refuse to double team the DE, going after the OLB, if the DE doesn't have the ability to punish the offense if left one-on-one. Tuitt seems to have the skills to get to the QB.
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #6
mussop
Hall of Fame
 
mussop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,251
Rep Power: 110436 mussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by badboy View Post
really like Hart but I am going with Tuitt # 34.
100%agree with this. Scared he's going to be long gone before 34. If he's there we better run to the podium.
__________________
"I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots." Albert Einstein
mussop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #7
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 35,774
Rep Power: 298525 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number19 View Post
Here's my first attempt this draft season.

#1a ( 1-4) OLB Anthony Barr

#1b ( 1-26) OLB Kyle Van Noy

#2a (2-1) QB Jimmy Garoppolo

#2b (2-3) ILB Yawin Smallwood

#3 (3-1) OT Ja'Wuan James

#4 (4-1) DE Josh Mauro

#5a (5-1) NT Ryan Carrethers
6, maybe 7 starters... yeah I think that would kill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by badboy View Post
Pretty interesting, would you care to say what happens to Mercilus and Reed?
If we cut Mercilus it hurts our cap by $900K. However, cutting Reed makes up for it. Depending on what Travardo looks like in year two though... I'd most likely keep them for depth this year, but they'll be on notice if they aren't already.
__________________
thunderkyss is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 02-09-2014   #8
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 35,774
Rep Power: 298525 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number19 View Post
Reed will be fighting for a backup role, either inside or outside - if he makes the team. Mercilus was a hard decision. IMO he's an unknown. If I was convinced he could be dominating in our new defensive scheme, I'd have to completely rethink my draft. Barr would be. Perhaps Barr could move to SAM and open up 1b- maybe WR Allen Robinson - but I'd more likely go OL. But Mercilus does present a dilemma for me.
I'd like to see a WR in this draft, but.... I don't have a problem with having "too much talent" on defense, if there is such a thing.

I want to dominate on one side of the ball after this draft. Get me Sammy Watkins in the first & Morgan Moses in the second... then Andre Williams in the 4th or 5th & I think we can dominate on offense.

Your draft as is, we dominate on defense & I'm fine with that.
__________________
thunderkyss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #9
mussop
Hall of Fame
 
mussop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,251
Rep Power: 110436 mussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respectedmussop is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderkyss View Post
6, maybe 7 starters... yeah I think that would kill.


If we cut Mercilus it hurts our cap by $900K. However, cutting Reed makes up for it. Depending on what Travardo looks like in year two though... I'd most likely keep them for depth this year, but they'll be on notice if they aren't already.
How about we see what Mercilous can do with real coaching before we cut him.
__________________
"I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots." Albert Einstein
mussop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #10
badboy
Site Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Clear Lake
Posts: 23,885
Rep Power: 183943 badboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respectedbadboy is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
100%agree with this. Scared he's going to be long gone before 34. If he's there we better run to the podium.
in my trade scenario trying to decide Van Noy at #26 and Tuitt #34 or switch them. Getting both would be awesome.
__________________
I want to be able to recognize the difference between a "want" and a "need" and then I want to be satisfied with getting a need
badboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #11
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 35,774
Rep Power: 298525 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
How about we see what Mercilous can do with real coaching before we cut him.
I was just throwing it out there..... that it would be a wash if we cut both (cap wise)... I suggested we keep them both. But I'm still drafting a pass rusher before I sit & wait for Merci to blow up.
__________________
thunderkyss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #12
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 827
Rep Power: 31527 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

I'm wasting too much time on football this weekend, trying to analyze potential trades.

The Rams, at #2, don't need a QB but need OL. They are likely to trade back a few spots and still have their choice of several elite prospects. But who would be likely to trade up?

Unfortunately, Cleveland is one. They want Manziel, but would settle for Bridgewater. This trade would insure them of getting one or the other. So why trade with the Texans?

Minnesota, sitting at #8, needs a QB. But to trade up so many spots would cost too much. They are more likely to sit tight and draft defense if a QB doesn't fall to them.

That leaves Oakland as a franchise needing a QB. They could sit tight and pick up Californian Derek Carr. But I can see Manziel fitting perfectly into Oakland and the Californian scene. Could they be a likely trade partner for the Texans, stealing Manziel away from Cleveland?

So what would we get from such a trade? It would take their #2 and their #3; so we would get #5, #36 and #67.

But they could pull the same trade with the Rams, leaving Cleveland at #4. And what about the Jags, sitting at #3? They need a QB to either replace or push Gabbert, but do they need to take one at this spot? They also need a DE and here they are sitting perfect for Clowney. So QB or Clowney? That's the question running through the Cleveland organization.

With the likelihood of St Louis trading back, to insure themselves of getting one of the top three QB's, Cleveland has to think to themselves that they have to trade up. But I think Badboy is probably right. In my trade scenario I'm asking too much. I'm thinking a more realistic price is in keeping with something similar to what Oakland would offer, and that is, Cleveland's #2 and their #3 might entice them into pulling the deal with the Texans. We would end up with picks #4, #35 and #71.

If the Texans manage a trade, either with Cleveland or Oakland, or someone else, what we get in return will be along these lines.

What goes against the Texans though is history. A trade for the #1 pick is seldom pulled off. But I'm going to have to adjust this draft to reflect this more realistic trade value. And I'll have to also come up with a draft to reflect a much more probable no-trade situation.

PS There's one other trade possibility, and that is, Atlanta trading up to take Clowney. They need OL help and they could sit tight for this need. But they also need a DE. We need Clowney to just just blow everyone away with his workout. And he say's he's going to do exactly that.
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #13
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 827
Rep Power: 31527 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
How about we see what Mercilous can do with real coaching before we cut him.
I wouldn't cut him this season, you're right. But I would put out feelers to see if he has trade value. He's two years into his rookie contract and has put up somewhat decent production: 72 tackles w/ 53 solo to go along with 13 sacks and 2 forced fumbles. We should get at least a #3 for him. But he might be more valuable to us in a backup role.
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #14
steelbtexan
Hall of Fame
 
steelbtexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Age: 52
Posts: 12,443
Rep Power: 107872 steelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by badboy View Post
Pretty interesting, would you care to say what happens to Mercilus and Reed? I was big fan of Huff but he didn't look good in the after season game. Just a thought but I'd go with a bigger DT to replace Smith. Not sure Brown will give up their second with the two firsts but maybe one or both of their thirds instead? I'm thinking Josh Gordon could be a part of their trade offer.
I would take #4, Josh Gordon, a 3rd rd pick and a 2015 1st for #1 and a 5th.

Of course I think Gordon is only behind Calvin and A.J. Green in WR rankings in the NFL.
steelbtexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #15
WolverineFan
Hall of Fame
 
WolverineFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,889
Rep Power: 113798 WolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respectedWolverineFan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelbtexan View Post
I would take #4, Josh Gordon, a 3rd rd pick and a 2015 1st for #1 and a 5th.

Of course I think Gordon is only behind Calvin and A.J. Green in WR rankings in the NFL.
I seriously doubt they give up (2) 1st's, a 3rd, and their best player. That's basically (3) 1st's + a 3rd. I know there were a lot of rumors about him being on the market last year, but I seriously doubt that still carries any weight at this point.
__________________
"Those who stay will be champions."

- The Immortal Bo
WolverineFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #16
steelbtexan
Hall of Fame
 
steelbtexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Age: 52
Posts: 12,443
Rep Power: 107872 steelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respectedsteelbtexan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by WolverineFan View Post
I seriously doubt they give up (2) 1st's, a 3rd, and their best player. That's basically (3) 1st's + a 3rd. I know there were a lot of rumors about him being on the market last year, but I seriously doubt that still carries any weight at this point.
Agreed

That's an RG3 trade. But the Texans are assuming a lot of risk. Gordon is 1 strike away from becoming Blackmon. So while his on field value is a 1st his actual value is probably in the 2nd/3rd rd range. IMHO
steelbtexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #17
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 35,774
Rep Power: 298525 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number19 View Post
I'm thinking a more realistic price is in keeping with something similar to what Oakland would offer, and that is, Cleveland's #2 and their #3 might entice them into pulling the deal with the Texans. We would end up with picks #4, #35 and #71.
Just me, but I would ask for their 4th as well, it only adds another 92 points to the deal.


4, 33, 35, 65, 71, 97, & 102...

3 picks in the top 35, seven picks in the top 100 (a little stretch to include 102)
__________________
thunderkyss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #18
Marshall 
Subscribed Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,330
Rep Power: 79827 Marshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respectedMarshall is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number19 View Post
I'm wasting too much time on football this weekend, trying to analyze potential trades.

The Rams, at #2, don't need a QB but need OL. They are likely to trade back a few spots and still have their choice of several elite prospects. But who would be likely to trade up?

Unfortunately, Cleveland is one. They want Manziel, but would settle for Bridgewater. This trade would insure them of getting one or the other. So why trade with the Texans?

Minnesota, sitting at #8, needs a QB. But to trade up so many spots would cost too much. They are more likely to sit tight and draft defense if a QB doesn't fall to them.

That leaves Oakland as a franchise needing a QB. They could sit tight and pick up Californian Derek Carr. But I can see Manziel fitting perfectly into Oakland and the Californian scene. Could they be a likely trade partner for the Texans, stealing Manziel away from Cleveland?

So what would we get from such a trade? It would take their #2 and their #3; so we would get #5, #36 and #67.

But they could pull the same trade with the Rams, leaving Cleveland at #4. And what about the Jags, sitting at #3? They need a QB to either replace or push Gabbert, but do they need to take one at this spot? They also need a DE and here they are sitting perfect for Clowney. So QB or Clowney? That's the question running through the Cleveland organization.

With the likelihood of St Louis trading back, to insure themselves of getting one of the top three QB's, Cleveland has to think to themselves that they have to trade up. But I think Badboy is probably right. In my trade scenario I'm asking too much. I'm thinking a more realistic price is in keeping with something similar to what Oakland would offer, and that is, Cleveland's #2 and their #3 might entice them into pulling the deal with the Texans. We would end up with picks #4, #35 and #71.

If the Texans manage a trade, either with Cleveland or Oakland, or someone else, what we get in return will be along these lines.

What goes against the Texans though is history. A trade for the #1 pick is seldom pulled off. But I'm going to have to adjust this draft to reflect this more realistic trade value. And I'll have to also come up with a draft to reflect a much more probable no-trade situation.

PS There's one other trade possibility, and that is, Atlanta trading up to take Clowney. They need OL help and they could sit tight for this need. But they also need a DE. We need Clowney to just just blow everyone away with his workout. And he say's he's going to do exactly that.
I suggest the first scenario
1-4(1800), 1-26(700) and 2-35(550)((3050)) for our 1-1 ((3000)).

or the second scenario with the addition of their 2015 first round picks (@420) and #103 (88)
#5(1700), #36(540) and #67(255) plus 2015-1 {420} and #103(88)((3003)) for our 1-1 ((3000)).

or the third scenario with the addition of their 2015 first round picks (@420)
#4(1800), #35(550) and #71(235) plus 2015-1 {420}((3005)) for our 1-1 ((3000)).

These seem to be floors for a trade.
Vikings response?
8 1400
40 500
72 230
96 116
104 86
136 38
168 24.2
200 11.4
2015#1 420
2015#2 210
((3036))
Marshall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #19
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 827
Rep Power: 31527 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall View Post
I suggest the first scenario...
This was also my first thought, to get value for value. But it takes two to tango. Looking at the needs of the teams available for a trade, and looking at the depth of the draft boards, there is not much incentive for teams to sacrifice the farm to trade up. In economic terms, it is not a seller's market. Under these circumstances you have to reduce your asking price to something more attractive to the buyer.

In my draft, I'm wanting to put the pieces in place to have a dominate defense built around the linebackers. I can lower my asking price, to make the trade, and to get me the picks I need to achieve my objective. This is a deep draft in the positions I'm targeting. So I come out ahead even if I don't get full sticker price value.
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014   #20
Number19
All Pro
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 66
Posts: 827
Rep Power: 31527 Number19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respectedNumber19 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texan's 7 round draft w/ Cleveland trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderkyss View Post
Just me, but I would ask for their 4th as well, it only adds another 92 points to the deal.


4, 33, 35, 65, 71, 97, & 102...

3 picks in the top 35, seven picks in the top 100 (a little stretch to include 102)
You always ask for a little bit more than you're willing to settle for. If they bite - great.
Number19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > Football Talk > College Football & the 2014 NFL Draft > Mock Draft Talk
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger