Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQDonate Automatic Monthly Contribution Members List Mark Forums Read


Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2013   #21
ArlingtonTexan
Moderator
 
ArlingtonTexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 6,035
Rep Power: 73193 ArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respectedArlingtonTexan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by the wonger need food View Post
Rick Smith was interviewed by Mike Florio of profootballtalk.com and offered quite a bit of insight as to why the Texans are standing pat and not aggressively going after free agents. He states that even though the team has lost several starters they are a better team due last season's experience...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...to-next-level/

Is anyone buying this? I believe that the owner's secret collusion agreement has a lot to do with the low contracts being signed however that doesn't help explain why the Texans are doing virtually nothing to help fill their multiple holes in the roster while teams like Denver, Indi, Seattle, etc. are apparently making every effort imaginable to win a championship.
The biggest thing to take from Smith's comments is that the organization is making an admission that they did not know how to win at the highest levels. Ed Reed is a reflection of trying to find a player that can help in the lockerroom and on the field in more intangible/leadership type ways.

As to why the Texans are not going crazy in free agency? They have stated rather build through the draft, not pick up the name of the day. The best thing the Texans front office does is stay to its core philosphies no matter how much you or i think the team should do different.
__________________
It doesn't just seem like I was talking down to people, I was. (Runner 8/4/09).
ArlingtonTexan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #22
drs23 
Veteran
 
drs23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: No more VIP Suite so back to the recliner
Section: No more VIP suite so back to the recliner
Age: 57
Posts: 4,409
Rep Power: 78264 drs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respecteddrs23 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by nero THE zero View Post
I think the reasoning behind the pursuit of Reed is twofold.

One, it brings in a veteran player-coach type with leadership in spades (see: Connor Barwin's comments on the lack of leadershuip adversely affecting the team down the stretch last season).

And, two, the team is sticking to its philosophy of building through the draft and signing its own guys. Speaking to your point above, the team in unwilling to give long-term, backloaded contracts to bit players when it anticipates locking up its all-pro level talent. IOW, the team is unwilling to sacrifice a long-term future with Brian Cushing or JJ Watt to sign a Glover Quin, Greg Jennings, or Eric Winston now. This is why, with a limited budget, a short-term contract with an Ed Reed makes all the sense in the world. It fills an immediate need, both as a player and a leader, and fits under the cap while not costing anything in the long term.
There's no room for logic here. The thread title is "inactivity". I think that means you can only post if you're going to shellack the FO.



__________________

Many thanks to sig Guru FS!

Sent from my keyboard using short, fat fingers.
drs23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #23
TexanBacker93
Hall of Fame
 
TexanBacker93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cypress, TX
Age: 43
Posts: 1,735
Rep Power: 17176 TexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanBacker93 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by the wonger need food View Post
I'm not sure that those teams had the holes and lack of depth that this Texans team needs to address. More importantly, those teams all had elite level QB's that made players around them better. We have the opposite with Schaub. He needs playmakers to make up for his lack of skills.
The other top teams that have made a lot of moves this off-season had a lot of holes also. They all had one thing we don't in a top 10 QB, but after that position we had more talent across the board than them. Not at every position, but there aren't a lot of positions that we could improve on during free agency. I'm considering the cost as well as the people involved. Yeah, Mike Williams would be a better #2 than anyone we have, but we couldn't spend that kind of money on him.

What positions do we need to upgrade?

QB? Most people feel we need a different QB. There are no free agents that are as good or could even grow into a franchise QB. We need to look at the draft for this.

HB? We'll need to replace Forsett. I liked him, but we can find a young cheap guy in the draft or pick up one of 10,000 available HBs to fill the 3rd string role.

FB? We just need to make sure we have one road grader that can help Foster. The ability to catch out of the backfield is a plus, but we don't throw to them that much. To replace Casey, I'd rather just have 1 true FB and then carry an extra TE. Clutts might be that guy, but it's not like Vonta is available right now and the run on FBs hasn't started yet.

TE? I like the 2 that we have on roster. We can upgrade, but none of the FAs were better than Daniels/Graham. Ideally the 3rd TE could be someone that's a little bit better at blocking, but can still catch the ball.

WR? Yes. We need a WR #2. There is nobody on the roster (that's not injured) that could be that guy. The WRs that have signed all got Andre money. You can't have 2 WRs making that money. We could have signed Welker for what he got under our current cap, but he's not a #2. He's a great slot receiver, but we need a guy that can stretch the field. Besides, would Welker come here to play with Schaub instead of going to Denver with Manning? Not even for $12 million for 1 year. There are still a lot of veteran receivers available that we can bring in that will upgrade the position for a low price and then we can draft someone early. This is a deep draft for receivers and we should be able to get a good one.

OL? RT is probably where most people want to see the team upgrade the line. Everyone sees that Winston's available and instantly want him to come back. Unless he will sign for the vet minimum it's not worth bringing him back. Newton will get better at run blocking and I think he's a better pass blocker already. We can find someone better than Newton if that's what is needed, but there is only so much money to work with. I think Jones and Brooks are the guards of the future or possible guard/center of the future if they want to look at Jones taking over for Myers. We can draft another interior lineman that fits our scheme that can be a backup if needed.

DL? We need a NT. There are some out there, but what kind of money are they wanting and since there haven't been tons of movement its worth waiting. I think drafting one in the first couple of rounds is the best alternative. What DT/NTs are available that anyone would be interested in. There are some older vets like Seymour around, but I'd rather go young for that spot. Indy signed Francios, but he's smaller than Cody and while it fits Wade's scheme I think most fans want bigger.

ILB? We do need a starting ILB. The problem with finding a good vet to play inside is we only have that 2nd guy on the field 30% of the time anyways. It was one of the reasons that made us get rid of Demeco. So, we don't want to overpay someone that isn't on the field as much. If we could find a good vet that we could pay the minimum to it would be great. After rosters start filling and after the draft it will be possible to get guys cheap. We've found a lot of ILB on the scrap heap. While I agree that last year we didn't have great play at that position. We are getting back a pro bowl player that is on the field for us. You add Cushing back and you slide the other guys back a spot. I'm ok with Cushing/Sharpton/Dobbins or another vet as your top 3. Cushing is the one that makes the position click. I still look for the team to draft this position as well.

OLB? We need another rusher. Barwin got his and I don't think anyone would have wanted him back at that cost. Although, it was low in the guaranteed money and that was a bit of a surprise. There are still a lot of edge rushers available. The big names are Freeney, Harrison, and Dumervil. I don't think Freeney fit into the 3-4 OLB spot well. He's looking for a 4-3 situation. Harrison doesn't seem to have a lot of suitors right now, but at the right price could be a good 3rd guy, but I don't know if I'd start him right now. Dumervil would be great, but I don't think he'd take a huge pay cut from what Denver will still pay him to come here. The rest of the available guys aren't that different from one another and we can find someone after the draft. I think they look to draft here as well.

CB? We needed a slot corner and we re-signed McCain. We have 2 good starting corners and 2 young under contract backups. Yeah, Nnamdi would be better than Carmichael, but you can't spend $5 million on a backup CB. I don't think there is an available CB that is better than our starters. We'll probably still draft one.

S? I think we upgraded this position with Reed. He's not a long term solution, but we can draft one or move Harris to safety as some hope. We need to upgrade our backups still, but it's not like the backup safeties are all being signed like crazy. Maybe Pollard could be the 3rd safety that can play in the box. There are a lot of vets still available.

ST? We have a kicker on the roster that was drafted last year. He'll be the kicker, but we will sign someone in May or June that can be competition. I think Bullock is the guy (well, he's at least Gary's guy). He may not be the answer for the next 10 years, but he'll be the one this year. We need a punter and with the number of 3 and outs we had last year we might need a good one. We had Jones who had a pretty good season and he's still available. We just brought in one of the best over the last 10 years and maybe he's the guy. I'm not too concerned about P, though. I don't want to spend tons of $$ at this position when we can draft one if needed or pick one up off the street in July. It's not like they need to know the playbook.

So yeah, there are a few spots where we need to upgrade and a few of those we can and will. We have 9 draft picks to use and the draft is deep in positions where we have need. There have been some quality players picked up by other teams that we will be fighting with for AFC supremacy and/or the Lombardi trophy. We didn't have as much cap room as a few of those and we didn't have a lot of expendable players that we could jettison to free up more space. We have a talented team. The 2 spots that we probably need the biggest upgrade are at QB and HC and there aren't any QBs available. As for HC, well, I'm available for the right price.
TexanBacker93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #24
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 33,848
Rep Power: 216695 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

tldr
__________________
thunderkyss is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #25
sandman
Veteran
 
sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Age: 44
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 44533 sandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by the wonger need food View Post
I'm not sure that those teams had the holes and lack of depth that this Texans team needs to address. More importantly, those teams all had elite level QB's that made players around them better. We have the opposite with Schaub. He needs playmakers to make up for his lack of skills.
Giants missed the playoffs two years in a row before winning in 2011 with a 9-7 record, and missed the playoffs again this year. Manning has had rather Schaub-like numbers those four years, but did get hot for their one playoff run.

The Ravens on the other hand have been a good team, going to the playoffs each of the last four years, but they kept losing their second game. Until this year when Flacco, who again had Schaub-like numbers in the last four regular seasons, got hot in the playoffs.

Sounds like success is defined as a decent team riding a QB hot streak in the playoffs.
sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #26
Double Barrel
Modified Simian
 
Double Barrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
Section: Gridiron, Tx
Age: 47
Posts: 30,687
Rep Power: 301240 Double Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respectedDouble Barrel is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by panamamyers View Post
Revisionist history to call Flacco or Eli Manning elite qb's going into 2012 and 2007.
yep. And it's myopic to call them elite after those years.

"Elite" can only be about 10% of starting QBs. That is 3 in the NFL. After Brady and Peyton Manning, we can debate about who is no. 3. But I can assure you that Eli, Big Ben, and Flacco are not going to beat out Brees or Aaron Rogers.
__________________
"Football is only a diversion." ~ HOUSTON TEXANS
Double Barrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #27
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 33,848
Rep Power: 216695 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Barrel View Post
yep. And it's myopic to call them elite after those years.

"Elite" can only be about 10% of starting QBs. That is 3 in the NFL. After Brady and Peyton Manning, we can debate about who is no. 3. But I can assure you that Eli, Big Ben, and Flacco are not going to beat out Brees or Aaron Rogers.
My definition of elite includes several years. Playing at a high level for 6 weeks don't get it done. You have to play at a high level for several years.

For me, several years mean 3 years minimum. Are Kaepernick, Russel Wilson, RG3 elite? Nope... they have elite talent, they have the ability to be elite QBs, but right now.... nope.

Is Matt Schaub Elite? Nope.... fair or not, you have to be on a winning team. He's only been on 3 winning teams so far & there was an abysmal 6-10 season (in which he played elite-like at times) in that stretch.

If Matt performs like he has the last two years & we finish with 10 or more wins, he's in the conversation. For me anyway.
__________________
thunderkyss is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #28
ObsiWan
Site Contributor
 
ObsiWan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: League City, Tx
Age: 62
Posts: 13,334
Rep Power: 194681 ObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by the wonger need food View Post
No, it's actual history... the dude's lead their teams to championships.
Quote:
Originally Posted by htownfan32 View Post
That makes Trent Dilfer elite too, huh? Phil Simms? Brad Johnson?

Anquan Boldin lead the Ravens to a championship, not Joe Flacco.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman View Post
Giants missed the playoffs two years in a row before winning in 2011 with a 9-7 record, and missed the playoffs again this year. Manning has had rather Schaub-like numbers those four years, but did get hot for their one playoff run.

The Ravens on the other hand have been a good team, going to the playoffs each of the last four years, but they kept losing their second game. Until this year when Flacco, who again had Schaub-like numbers in the last four regular seasons, got hot in the playoffs.

Sounds like success is defined as a decent team riding a QB hot streak in the playoffs.
MSR!

Don't underestimate the significance of the lucky-a$$ break either....
- Like Jacoby's miracle catch to force O/T against the Broncos.
- Or Welker dropping key passes in the division championship game.
- Or Jacoby making what appeared to be a stumble-bum catch (did you know that was his ONLY catch of the game) in the Super Bowl that he turned into six points.
ObsiWan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #29
sandman
Veteran
 
sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Age: 44
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 44533 sandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by ObsiWan View Post
MSR!

Don't underestimate the significance of the lucky-a$$ break either....
- Like Jacoby's miracle catch to force O/T against the Broncos.
- Or Welker dropping key passes in the division championship game.
- Or Jacoby making what appeared to be a stumble-bum catch (did you know that was his ONLY catch of the game) in the Super Bowl that he turned into six points.
Decided to look at the last six years for Manning and compare it to Schaub's six years as a starter. Manning played in every game, so had to pro-rate the average yards per season numbers to account for Schaub missing games in three seasons:

Accuracy - 65.1 to 60.4 Schaub
Average Yards per Season - 4192 to 3913 Schaub
Average yards per Attempt - 7.87 to 7.38 Schaub
TD:Int Ratio - 1.78 to 1.57 Schaub
QB Rating - 92 to 83 Schaub

Average Season Record - 10-6 to 9-7 Manning
Post Season Appearances - 3 to 2 Manning (Yes, Matt was hurt in 2011 but there was no doubt that the team was well on the way to making the playoffs at 7-3 when he went down)

The main difference between the two? The two seasons when Manning got hot in the playoffs and took a 10-6 team and a 9-7 team to Super Bowl wins. But he has NEVER won a playoff game outside of those two Super Bowl runs and his teams have missed the playoffs four times in his nine year career.

This isn't to argue that Schaub is an elite QB, because he is not. But how can you be considered an "Elite" quarterback when your stats are no better then Matty Half-Ear and you miss the playoffs entirely half of the time?
sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #30
DexmanC
Hall of Fame
 
DexmanC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,830
Rep Power: 34619 DexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respectedDexmanC is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Are you saying there's ANY sane argument that Peyton is NOT elite?
__________________
Coach O'Brien just might lead the Texans to their first 35-0 thumping of a decent opponent in 2014.
DexmanC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #31
sandman
Veteran
 
sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Age: 44
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 44533 sandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respectedsandman is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by DexmanC View Post
Are you saying there's ANY sane argument that Peyton is NOT elite?
I was referring to Eli
sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #32
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 33,848
Rep Power: 216695 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by DexmanC View Post
Are you saying there's ANY sane argument that Peyton is NOT elite?
C'mon brother, you're making us look bad. Try to keep pace with the fast kids.
__________________
thunderkyss is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #33
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 45,366
Rep Power: 303034 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman View Post
Decided to look at the last six years for Manning and compare it to Schaub's six years as a starter. ...
I don't know where you got your stats but even a cursory look and I can tell they are whack. Schaub's worst season as a starter in Houston his ypa was 7.4 and somehow you have him listed under that. Only his first season was under a 90 QB rating and that was 87.2 so how the heck do you get an average of 83?

In Houston he has averaged 261.4 ypg (which translates to 4182 per season), 7.9 ypa, 93.3 QB rating and 64.3 completion %.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #34
deucetx
All Pro
 
deucetx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 547
Rep Power: 25182 deucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respecteddeucetx is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
I don't know where you got your stats but even a cursory look and I can tell they are whack. Schaub's worst season as a starter in Houston his ypa was 7.4 and somehow you have him listed under that. Only his first season was under a 90 QB rating and that was 87.2 so how the heck do you get an average of 83?

In Houston he has averaged 261.4 ypg (which translates to 4182 per season), 7.9 ypa, 93.3 QB rating and 64.3 completion %.
You're reading it wrong. He said rating 92 to 83 Schaub...meaning Schaub had the higher rating of the two. The 92 rating belongs to Schaub and the 83 Eli. He just said Schaub at the end to signify he was the higher in comparison.
deucetx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #35
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 45,366
Rep Power: 303034 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by deucetx View Post
You're reading it wrong. He said rating 92 to 83 Schaub...meaning Schaub had the higher rating of the two. The 92 rating belongs to Schaub and the 83 Eli. He just said Schaub at the end to signify he was the higher in comparison.
My bad then.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #36
michaelm
vox nihili
 
michaelm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Spring, TX
Section: 648
Age: 48
Posts: 5,599
Rep Power: 88794 michaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respectedmichaelm is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by deucetx View Post
You're reading it wrong. He said rating 92 to 83 Schaub...meaning Schaub had the higher rating of the two. The 92 rating belongs to Schaub and the 83 Eli. He just said Schaub at the end to signify he was the higher in comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
My bad then.
FWIW, I didn't think his wording was very clear either. OTOH, I was able to correctly interpret it.
michaelm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #37
GP 
Go Texans!
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 17,747
Rep Power: 50777 GP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respectedGP is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eriadoc View Post
Well that's a downer, jeez.
Oh you think Bob "In Love With David Carr" McNair and Gary "I Can't Pick A Good D-Coord" Kubiak are helping this team more than Rick Smith's ability to know when to hold players and when to fold them?

I can't call the guy a wizard, but I guess when compared to the two stooges he's sandwiched in-between, Rick looks like Einstein.

We couldn't pay Brisiel, Dreessen, and Jason Allen what they got from their new teams. Winston was a cap move. Ryans a cap move (that we got trade value for, btw). We had a subpar year on the OL and yet I can't fault the FO for not overpaying Brisiel and Winston.

What I'm saying is that Rick Smith, and the guys building contracts for him, are doing a pretty good job....except for the Schaub premature ejack situation, which frankly REEKS of McNair or Kubiak shooting their wad too early, as they're prone to do on those lovable loser QBs that they have a history of sticking with.
__________________
GP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #38
76Texan
Hall of Fame
 
76Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,503
Rep Power: 81730 76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelm View Post
FWIW, I didn't think his wording was very clear either. OTOH, I was able to correctly interpret it.
Same here, LOL!
76Texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #39
76Texan
Hall of Fame
 
76Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,503
Rep Power: 81730 76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected76Texan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP View Post
Oh you think Bob "In Love With David Carr" McNair and Gary "I Can't Pick A Good D-Coord" Kubiak are helping this team more than Rick Smith's ability to know when to hold players and when to fold them?

I can't call the guy a wizard, but I guess when compared to the two stooges he's sandwiched in-between, Rick looks like Einstein.

We couldn't pay Brisiel, Dreessen, and Jason Allen what they got from their new teams. Winston was a cap move. Ryans a cap move (that we got trade value for, btw). We had a subpar year on the OL and yet I can't fault the FO for not overpaying Brisiel and Winston.

What I'm saying is that Rick Smith, and the guys building contracts for him, are doing a pretty good job....except for the Schaub premature ejack situation, which frankly REEKS of McNair or Kubiak shooting their wad too early, as they're prone to do on those lovable loser QBs that they have a history of sticking with.
I think sometimes people are just impatient when they see movements from other clubs and they don't want to worry about cap space or anything like that.
76Texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2013   #40
The Pencil Neck
Hall of Fame
 
The Pencil Neck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 52
Posts: 17,654
Rep Power: 226054 The Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respectedThe Pencil Neck is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Insight into Front Office inactivity

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
My bad then.
I had to read it a couple of times to figure it out, too.
__________________
Adoptee: #55 - Chris Myers.
The Pencil Neck is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com > The Great Fans of the Houston Texans > Texans Talk
Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger