![]() |
|
|||||||
| Texans Talk Football talk only please. Keep it to the game, the players, the coaches and management. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,889
Rep Power: 2454
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
another thing is winning organzations sometimes get players who want to come here 4 less ........... tho in this day of age for the players its all about getting payed and whats best for the family and IMO that comes first i dont care what logo im wearing on my helmet ..and im fine with that
but hopefully from here on out we can be contenders from here on out like the Pats and steelers and balty ..who have been to the PLayoffs going on like 6 years straight |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Section: Gridiron, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 27,082
Rep Power: 82006
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, on one hand it sucks that you can't keep all your players. Get rid of the salary cap! Of course, I can say that because the Texans are one of the more profitable teams in the league and I don't think McNair would have a problem spending some money.
But, on the other hand, this is kinda' positive as Texans fans since it's the first time that we see what successful teams experience all the time. You cannot keep players stocked in this day and age, so you develop them and they move on as casualties of the salary cap. The consistently good teams reload and keep doing what they do. This is what the Texans need to be, keep the wins coming and get used to losing good players every year because you cannot keep all of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,889
Rep Power: 2454
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
thats why if your team model is to build through the draft its sooooo IMPORTANT to hit on your draft picks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 683
Rep Power: 1116
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Always easier to look back vs ahead.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Fall of Hame
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX - Born and raised
Age: 35
Posts: 2,685
Rep Power: 8909
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Subscribed Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,291
Rep Power: 52089
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
markbeth
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: utah
Age: 43
Posts: 1,914
Rep Power: 5935
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 - I hate to see this board when we start losing more than once every six games.
2 - I think we should of kept Winston and Brisiel and traded foster for draft picks. I know it's not a popular opinion but imo offensive lineman are more important to a consistant run game than running backs. They also protect the quarterback. 3 - This thread is about how the loss of certain players effects this current team. Why would you want him to put it in the NFL thread?
__________________
formally known as markbeth |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Tomball
Section: Bar Table
Age: 28
Posts: 839
Rep Power: 8620
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think we miss Leach honestly, and Ryans obviously now that Cush is gone if not for how he was playing when he was with us last, than as a leader on the team, and on the field, which is a big part of what were missing with Cush gone.
I still don't understand why we dropped Vickers.. it isn't like the guy was getting paid tons of money and it seemed like at the end of the last season he was really starting to click with our offensive line and RB's. He wasn't a Leach level FB but he did the job very well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Fall of Hame
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX - Born and raised
Age: 35
Posts: 2,685
Rep Power: 8909
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Is this Sparta?
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Out of the desert finally...
Age: 31
Posts: 5,026
Rep Power: 6218
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Winston was a tough cut to make, but 5/5 times I'd rather sign Brown long term than Winston. Though like others I really would've liked to even gotten a late round pick back instead of straight cut.
Brisiel got overpaid, plain and simple. What some people on the board forget is how long it took for Brisiel to develop into a solid player, he wasn't and isn't likely going to get a pro bowl nod, but he was solid. I think Jones probably compares well in physical terms, but Brooks has an insane ceiling. I hated losing Ryans, but I'm not sure if he was going to get the amount of snaps to match his pay. I do think he would probably have a better plug in than Dobbins after Cushing's injury. I really do like Casey's versatility, but I do think its unfair to compare him to Leach. Leach is a prototypical skull crushing FB, while Casey is more of an H back who brings a lot more in the passing game. I'd really love to see him get more snaps at TE. I would have liked to keep Dressen because he was a bigger redzone target than OD last year. I hope in the end the Texans can get the same with he combined efforts of Graham and Casey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Subscribed Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston. Mediocrity Lives Here!!
Section: Bull Pen!!
Age: 45
Posts: 47,087
Rep Power: 42178
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Ryans - Better suited for the 4-3. That said, the FO and probably Wade probably overestimated what Bradie James had left in the tank. That coupled with the Cushing injury didn't work out well, but hell everyone is a MMQ. Winston - Love the guy as a person and everything he did while here (I'm looking at you Gary) as a person. With that comes football facts. His last two seasons weren't all that great, especially for the money he was due. Briesel - He chose to opt out. His choice. Disappointing for sure, but nothing we could've done about. Granted the last two were the right side of the line and maybe that's why we're seeing a decline in our offensive production. On the positive side both those guys leaving helped lock-up Duane Brown. Once Newton, Jones, Caldwell (or whatever combination) get some continuity, they'll be fine. Leach - I love the guy. In fact, he was on 1560 earlier this evening. He just was too expensive for a true Fullback which is an antiquated position nowadays. I hope nothing but the best for him except this Sunday and sometime in January. First off, losing good players that you would love to keep is a good sign. I truly mean that. It means you have a pretty good football team with good players that other teams want. That's never been the case prior to the players you outlined above. Second, we're 5-1 about to be 6-1, so quit being: ![]()
__________________
DeAndre! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Age: 20
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 2301
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Is that you John Wayne? Is this me? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
All Pro
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: round rock
Section: My Couch
Age: 30
Posts: 765
Rep Power: 3337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We're 5-1. Me thinks we're going to be fine.
__________________
Ill be where I'm at. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Go Texans!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 17,747
Rep Power: 50138
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We cannot pay everyone.
It's the price/cost of becoming a GOOD TEAM...all these players want bigger money, and they know they can leverage it against us OR get what they want from lesser teams who have more space than we do. I think we should have found the money and space to retain Brisiel, though. He was a consistent blocker on the right side that would not have cost much more money. How is he faring in Oakland, anyways? I have not followed the guy there.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not reaching the ground. It's roots must hold the sky.
Section: 521/Couch
Age: 26
Posts: 7,648
Rep Power: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 loss and people pine away for the days and players that regularly missed the playoffs.
I'll take 2012 Texans over any other year, please and thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,670
Rep Power: 27383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The problem with keeping Dreessen is that we don't have enough snaps to go around.
Last year, we pretty much put Graham on the shelf; and that was with Casey out for part of the year. It's time to use our draft choice. Same thing with keeping Leach, or Vickers now that Casey is fully healthy. Graham is making steady progress in his blocking, so far he's looking better than OD in this regard. Against the Packers, his blocks ranged from not-so-bad to very very good. He held his own against Clay Matthews on 3 occasions. He didn't get beat like D. Brown or O.D. Against the Jets, he was pretty dominant; his blocks ranged from decent to excellent. Actually, he's already way ahead of Dreessen at the same stage of their career. We should be just fine, knock on wood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Ooops
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 32
Posts: 6,837
Rep Power: 27461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
COOL BEANS!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston
Section: Fort Kickass
Age: 28
Posts: 13,723
Rep Power: 77704
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So who do you wanna keep?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,670
Rep Power: 27383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
He has yet to give up a sack and was charged with two penalties so far. He suffered a concussion last week agains the Falcons (so he's in the same boat as Caldwell on this end; otherwise, he's healthy.) Before he left the game late in the second quarter, the Raiders were 12-22 in the running game. Without him, they went 20-127. Big difference. The Raiders RBs averaged 3.15 ypc with Brisiel in the game (all 5 games.) I don't know how much it has to do with Brisiel. One thing I know is that ProFootballFocus reported him as having a bad day against the Dolphins (at least as bad as Caldwell did, it looks like.) "Offensive Line Questions A large part of the difficulty the Raiders have found in running the ball has to do with the play of the offensive line. The interior of the unit — left guard Cooper Carlisle, center Stefen Wisniewski, and right guard Mike Briesel – combined for an overall grade of -8.8 this week. The entire group had problems with the Dolphins’ defensive line and was constantly overpowered, struggling to get movement laterally to execute their zone blocking scheme and looking equally unimpressive in the passing game." https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...lphins-week-2/ ... Overall, it doesn't seem like we missed Brisiel all that much. Had Caldwell been fully healthy, I don't think we miss Biscuit at all. I like his tenacity and give-it-all attitude and his solid play, but going forward I think we'll be fine at RG with either a healthy Caldwell or a more seasoned Ben Jones (not to mention the upside of Brooks.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Hall of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,670
Rep Power: 27383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
We might be the team that pound the rock the most on 3rd or 4th and short. These are instances where the defense stack the line and it's difficult to gain much yardage. I looked at the Chiefs for example. They only ran on those occasions 8 times in 6 games with 3 different backs. We use Tate that much by himself, and we use Foster almost 3 times as much. We also run the ball a lot near the goal-line. We also had several instances where we were back-up near our own and decided to run the ball some to get out of risky situation by passing the ball. And there were times when wanted to consume the clock (when we had a big lead.) Against the Dolphins, Foster netted 2 yards on 3 carries toward the end. Schaub knelt down 3 times for -3. All of that reflects in the 3.8 ypc. Against the Jags, Schaub knelt down twice for -3 Against the Broncos, Foster ran 5 times for 12 yards to run down the clock. Against the Titans, Schaub knelt down twice for -2 Against the Jets, Foster ran 3 times for -5 Against the Packers, Foster ran twice for 3 yards with 12 seconds left in the half. We were on our 13-yd line and just wanted to end the half, but the Packers called a stupid time-out to make us run another play. Take out just these 20 times that we ran out the clock, and the average is already up to 4.15 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|