Nolan a Texan again

[Rey]

Originally Posted by Stemp

Demps will be on IR. Why do they need to make a cut?

Demps isn't going to IR.

[The Pencil Neck]

Originally Posted by Lurvinator11

Probably Gardener.

Haven't seen him at all this season.

I have seen Holliday and he ain't the pre-season version. I don't think Kubes likes keeping a specialist like that on the roster and if he's not going to be giving us something, we've got other guys that can do that job.

With Caldwell down, I think there's less chance of Gardener getting cut because it would leave us a little thinner on the OL.

[El Tejano]

Originally Posted by HJam72

Man, Holiday has really fallen off in the real season. He's taking up a roster spot just to be the returner, and ultimately he's not even good at it. I mean he has some serious skills, but they don't translate into anything but an over-exciting return from the endzone to the (maybe) 25 yd. line, and he's a constant threat to drop the catch/fumble/get his little butt killed on every return.

Did anyone else notice that Tenn must've saw something on tape? Every single guy that tackled him was trying to rip the ball at the exact same spot on every return, if he was down or not.

[Lurvinator11]

This is an if, and a big IF, but we COULD release Beck.

Since he is third string, and it wouldn't disrupt the main scheme of things.

I guess we will see.

UPDATE: I'm listening to 610 right now, they might put him on temporary IR, which means we wouldn't need to cut anybody.

Once again, we will wait until we hear a word from Texans camp.

[TheIronDuke]

Originally Posted by The Pencil Neck

I have seen Holliday and he ain't the pre-season version. I don't think Kubes likes keeping a specialist like that on the roster and if he's not going to be giving us something, we've got other guys that can do that job.

With Caldwell down, I think there's less chance of Gardener getting cut because it would leave us a little thinner on the OL.

I don't think Kubes is impressed either. Wasn't Forsett returning a kickoff at the end of the Tenn game?

[Lurvinator11]

Originally Posted by TheIronDuke

I don't think Kubes is impressed either. Wasn't Forsett returning a kickoff at the end of the Tenn game?

I actually wouldn't have a problem with Forsett returning, since he isn't a starter.

Once again, we will see.

[Rey]

Originally Posted by Rey

Demps isn't going to IR.

Well apparently demps CAN go to temporary IR...

[HOU-TEX]

Originally Posted by Rey

Well apparently demps CAN go to temporary IR...

Which is what I think will happen.

[Errant Hothy]

Should the designated to return tag be saved for somebody just a tad more important than Demps?

[Lurvinator11]

Originally Posted by Rey

Well apparently demps CAN go to temporary IR...

Like I said in an earlier post, if that is correct, it is probably what will happen.

[srrono]

http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/sho...t=95018&page=2

Troy Nolan Released by Dolphins on 9/25 is still a Free Agent. I would like to see him back in Houston. I would rather him than Keo to replace S Quintin Demps.

I posted this yesterday and some one decided to move it into a thread.

[BIG TORO]

Originally Posted by Errant Hothy

Should the designated to return tag be saved for somebody just a tad more important than Demps?

Agree I don't think we will use it on demps. We should save that for a star player.

[Rey]

Originally Posted by Errant Hothy

Should the designated to return tag be saved for somebody just a tad more important than Demps?

What's the difference?

[HJam72]

Originally Posted by Rey

What's the difference?

Talent

[Rey]

Originally Posted by HJam72

Talent

What? That doesn't make any sense.

I don't get the difference in using it on demps or a "more important player"...

Has no bearing on the actual player. The only difference is in one scenario you have to cut a guy and in the other you don't.

Why would you save it for another player that may or may not need an extended recovery period?

[TejasTom]

You can only use it once.

Posted using Tapatalk from my phone. May contain errors.

[HJam72]

Originally Posted by Rey

What? That doesn't make any sense.

I don't get the difference in using it on demps or a "more important player"...

Has no bearing on the actual player. The only difference is in one scenario you have to cut a guy and in the other you don't.

Why would you save it for another player?

I can think of a scenario that MIGHT be true (or not) that tells me I should let somebody else answer that who knows what they're talking about.

After all, I was just screwin' wit ya...

[The Pencil Neck]

Originally Posted by Rey

What? That doesn't make any sense.

I don't get the difference in using it on demps or a "more important player"...

Has no bearing on the actual player. The only difference is in one scenario you have to cut a guy and in the other you don't.

Why would you save it for another player?

Someone else might get injured that you want to bring back more. It's not like you've got an infinite amount of these things.

[HJam72]

Originally Posted by The Pencil Neck

Someone else might get injured that you want to bring back more. It's not like you've got an infinite amount of these things.

Well, that's the part I didn't know. How many of "those things" do we have?

[Rey]

Originally Posted by The Pencil Neck

Someone else might get injured that you want to bring back more. It's not like you've got an infinite amount of these things.

That doesn't make any sense.

All you have to do is put them on the inactive list like they did every other year before this was added.

The only difference that if you use the new rule you don't have to cut anyone. This has no actual bearing on the injured player if I understand right. It affects bubble guys...That's why we were discussing who was going to get cut...

Remember that?