Quote:
Originally Posted by beerlover
Tannehill is not part of our equation, not sure why some big time mock drafts have him so high? I would take a chance on Weeden before Tannehill, at least I know that he could be an adequate back-up. my QB ranking would look something like this: (doesn't mean where I expect them to be selected because it never does) - Luck -1st
- Griffin - 1st
- Foles - 2nd
- Lindley - 2nd/3rd
- Weeden - 3rd
- Osweiler - 3rd
- Tannehill - 3rd
- Coleman - 4th/5th
- Cousins -5th
|
I haven't seen a whole lot of Foles or Lindley, but I like what I saw out of Weeden better than Tannehill.
I really like Weeden. The zip on his passes is really, really nice.