Originally Posted by Texecutioner
If he wasn't the diamond in Denver, what on earth makes you think he could come and be one over here with Salaam and a rookie at tackle? Their are better RB's that the Texans could be going after right now than Mike Bell I can assure you.
Sorry but signing him didn't really help the team. It just added another so so RB to the roster that will blend in with the bunch we already have.
The chances of him being the next Priest Holmes is pretty much astronomical, but Holmes had far more chances to prove himself in Baltimore than Bell did in Denver.
You are probably right about Bell not being a difference maker (or even a roster-maker) with the Texans, but your logic is just plain wrong.
And for the second time, who are the other RB's out there (and make sure they haven't been given a previous opportunity and not made the most of it).