Originally Posted by FILO_girl
Way to attack the poster and not the post.
If you have been around here for any length of time...you would know that doesn't fit me at all.
I don't agree Schaub is necessarily better and stated I needed to see him play more to convince myself that he is not fragile.
You stated they should get equal time and be equal. I said that they shouldn't, and the idea sounded flawed and weak. That's not attacking you, that's disagreeing (or if you prefer - attacking) your suggestion.
If disagreeing (attacking) your idea is the same as attacking you, then I've attacked lots of people, and been attacked many times in return.