Originally Posted by FILO_girl
That is just it...we wouldn't have a designated second best. Whoever was the best player would be the starting QB.
They would be equals, whomever was the more dominant player would be the one who was playing. Keeps 'em hungry...Comprendez?
I think there are many things wrong with that. You can't just say they're equals because you want them to be
! One of them is the better QB! To say they're equal just sounds like someone who's been to way too many new-age parenting classes, and just doesn't want to hurt anyone's feelings. Even if the people in charge of the decision ultimately think it's Sage, you play your best players!
Should we give Andre Davis more playing time in order to keep AJ hungry? Think the Pats ought to get Cassel in the game more to make sure Brady doesn't rest on his laurels?
One of these guys is better (Schaub), determine which one (Schaub), and then let whoever that is (Schaub) be your QB.