View Single Post
Old 03-14-2005   #298
texanfan2002114 
Subscribed Contributor
 
texanfan2002114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On the front row in the endzone!!!
Age: 37
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 615 texanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respectedtexanfan2002114 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak
Do you have a source for this because the NFL CBA doesn't mention any three year limit?

See
Article XX.
From ESPN article:

The Rams have franchised Pace for three consecutive years. Under terms of that designation, the Rams have until Wednesday to work out a long-term contract and regain the ability to franchise a player in 2006. Any long agreement reached between Wednesday and July 15 would cost St. Louis its franchise tag for the length of that contract.


http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2012782

Good enough for you??
texanfan2002114 is offline   Reply With Quote