Originally Posted by Marcus
The difference between Wand and McKinney is rather stark.
Wand, playing one season at LT, is expected to only get better as he gets experience, and then you have highly paid Steve "we have one of the top 10 lines in the league" McKinney with years of experience, and is only going to get worse as his arrogance grows?
Sorry. To me, it's a no brainer.
Definitely a good point. But my concern isn't who's better based on how long they've been doing it...it's more about which one actually hurts Houston more by being subpar. Is it more important right now to find a better center or a better LT? Even though I think there's not much out there in the way of "better" available LTs, I do think Wand is the bigger liability.