Originally Posted by Double Barrel
Mould caught 57 passes last year, so I keep wondering what people are talking about him having a bad year.
He had a good year as number 2 receiver by Texans standards. People talk about him having a bad year because he is no longer a Texan
. That is really the only thing that matters. The assumptions are that:
Major premise: Kubiak never make mistakes
Minor premise: Moulds was cut
Conclusion: Moulds sucks
If the conclusion is wrong, one of the premises is wrong.
Try this one.
Originally Posted by Specnatz
I thought it was in spite of the o-line??
Major Premise: David Carr was the only problem with the Texans
Minor Premise: The offensive line is not David Carr
Conclusion: There is nothing wrong with the offensive line
Corollary: Any post that criticizes the offensive line is wrong by definition
Hint: when looking for fallacies, key in on absolutes like never, always, every, best, worst,