Originally Posted by Texan_Bill
Thats actually an excellent idea. Then some of these talking heads might be held accountable for the jibberish that spews forth..
It wouldn't quite be a peer review, but work much the same. You could have, let's say, 8 panelists covering 4 teams each, who would read all the reports for for those teams. Then after checking the journalists for accuracy and content, rank them accordingly.
Post this on a site week after week, someone will start paying attention.