View Single Post
Old 11-15-2004   #3
Join Date: Aug 2004
Age: 27
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 0 BATexan37 is ridin' the pine

I have to disagree with u on that one.. Yes blaylock is a better back behind KC's MASSIVE O-line...Our O-line is bad but they are not terrible. Our backs are young they can't read holes that well they don't knw things he knows he's a patient runner and when he gets open ground he turns the afterburner on he learned from preist and I think we can get him for a bargain. We have this offseason to make our O-line better wich I am sure we will I think he is a RISK that will pay off BIG if we take it, if we get him and he can run the ball consistenly then that opens so many more things wich means more time for Offense to work and more time for D to rest.
BATexan37 is offline   Reply With Quote