View Single Post
Old 04-01-2014   #63
ObsiWan
Site Contributor
 
ObsiWan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: League City, Tx
Age: 63
Posts: 15,243
Rep Power: 291679 ObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respectedObsiWan is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Should foster be next to go?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
I know foster has a lot off supporters here but when you look at his mileage, contract, injury history and current off field issues it should be considered. I believe his value will only decline from this point forward. IMO we should seeing what we can get in return for him in a trade.

There should be some very good backs available late in this draft.
You just defeated your own argument.

Why would anyone give up even a late pick if your final statement is anywhere close to true. Why would a team give up a pick then pay even vet minimum (assuming Foster'd sign for that) when as you said yourself "there should be some very good backs available late in this draft" for 5th thru 7th round rookie money?
ObsiWan is offline   Reply With Quote