Originally Posted by infantrycak
What is this guy using as an error rate because INTs clearly are not in Manziel's favor against several of those guys?
Talk about an amorphous qualifier swallowing a definitive statement.
Everyone says Manziel acts like a spoiled kid at least at times.
But the author didn't find any of the concerns expressed "great" whatever that means.
If I was proferring a guess, I'd say he's saying that a sizeable percentage of those ints aren't "on the qb". Weird tipped balls, deflections, etc.
As to the "none were great" statement, that sounds like typical scout fodder. We're somewhat concerned by "a", but its not a show-stopper.