Thread: Manziel
View Single Post
Old 01-30-2014   #1882
disaacks3
Site Contributor
 
disaacks3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Section: 116 - Row M
Age: 45
Posts: 10,398
Rep Power: 116197 disaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respecteddisaacks3 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Manziel

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
What is this guy using as an error rate because INTs clearly are not in Manziel's favor against several of those guys?


Talk about an amorphous qualifier swallowing a definitive statement.

Everyone says Manziel acts like a spoiled kid at least at times.

But the author didn't find any of the concerns expressed "great" whatever that means.
If I was proferring a guess, I'd say he's saying that a sizeable percentage of those ints aren't "on the qb". Weird tipped balls, deflections, etc.

As to the "none were great" statement, that sounds like typical scout fodder. We're somewhat concerned by "a", but its not a show-stopper.
__________________
D.B. - That sounds like a nugget of reality wrapped in a layer of embellished hyperbole.
disaacks3 is online now