Originally Posted by bhsman
Interesting that Kiper thinks Barr could go #1 based on schematic fit; it might not be the worst idea.
I like him more than Clowney overall. If we stick to the 3-4, I think Barr has the potential to be more productive.
Just where exactly is Clowney going to fit in the 3-4? Is Barr a better 3-4 player, even if you like Clowney more overall? I think Barr is better overall, but some who don't may come to the conclusion that Barr is more valuable than Clowney is in the 3-4.