Originally Posted by TexansFTW
1. 4.78 – I took his 40 high to skew the stat in my favor.
I doubt you’d disagree with that style of thinking
2. I highly doubt you “guessed” a 4.65. Regardless, he is faster, but prefers not to run. This is a great quality for a guy that loves to look downfield to find the true playmakers on the football field instead of scrambling for 5 yards and getting smashed.
3. Luck is 6’4” and 240.
Every place I see that gives close accuracy has Bortles at 6’3” and 227-230.
4. Finally, being a super up tempo, no huddle team completely invalidates the point they run similar offenses IMO. That’s just as big of a difference as run/pass ratio, or taking snaps under center as opposed to spread out wide in the shotgun.
I would hope that your "style of thinking"
but since you're trying to skew numbers to YOUR FAVOR
, sadly I can see that it's not. Objective thinking is absent any bias, prejudice, FAVOR
, falling in love with or wishing or wanting a player to be good. Absent Objective Thinking is how mistakes are made and what gets people fired.
Luck at the Combine weighed 234. So Luck is a 1/2" taller and weighs 4 lbs more than Bortles.